As you know, the mailing list has moved over per:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2361. Btw, if you can answer my
recent questions in that issue, that would be great!
As for the code base move, yes, please go ahead and do so (I'm not clear on
how to do it, so please share the steps).
I looked over LUCENE-2190 earlier today, and the port should be easy (and I see
that Mike already completed the port in LUCENE-2190, thanks Mike!)
If we are going to do this, then let us go all the way and port over fixes made
to 2.9.2; the list is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LU
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Garski updated LUCENENET-331:
-
Attachment: LUCENENET-331.patch
Patch ported, regression on all tests in Search namesp
CustomScoreQuery (function query) is broken (due to per-segment searching)
--
Key: LUCENENET-331
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-331
Project: Lucene.Net
I'll check it out more in detail this week as I am making some changes to our
CustomSoreQuery implementations, and will open an item and post a patch then.
If anyone else wants to take a crack at it in the interim, go for it.
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail
Not yet.
Any help is welcome :-)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgar...@myspace-inc.com]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 10:53 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Status of Lucene.Net 2.9.1
I think that's a great idea - are you working on a parch fo
Maybe, this issue can be incorporated in 2.9.1
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2190
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 3:32 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Status of Lucene.Net 2.9.1
Hi folk
I think that's a great idea - are you working on a parch for it?
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 12:50 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Status of Lucene.Net 2.9.1
Maybe, this issue can be incorporated i
There is an argument for making a formal release of 2.4.x as the first
post-incubator release, since people will want 2.4 support for a long
time to come. It allow you to wring release process issues.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Digy wrote:
> The NIOFSDirectory implementation is buggy + Lucen
The NIOFSDirectory implementation is buggy + Lucene.Java doesn't recommend
it on Windows.
(http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_1/api/all/org/apache/lucene/store/NIOFSDi
rectory.html)
Until we have a good(not just bug-free) implementaion of NIOFSDirectory we
should replace it with a dummy (just throw
On Jan 4, 2010, at 8:26 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Jan 3, 2010, at 8:32 PM, George Aroush wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>>
>>
>> Happy New Year!
>>
>>
>>
>> So what's the status of 2.9.1? Are there any outstanding issues need to be
>> resolved? Has folks been giving it a try?
>
> Yes
On Jan 3, 2010, at 8:32 PM, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
>
> Happy New Year!
>
>
>
> So what's the status of 2.9.1? Are there any outstanding issues need to be
> resolved? Has folks been giving it a try?
Yes, we need to finish cleaning up the incubator, moving SVN, etc. I can do
I've been using 2.9.1 for a few weeks and have not encountered any issues to
date.
Michael
-Original Message-
From: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net]
Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 5:32 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Status of Lucene.Net 2.9.1
Hi folks,
Hap
13 matches
Mail list logo
