Garski as committer to Lucene.Net
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:13 PM, George Aroush wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>>
>>
>> I propose Michael Garski as a new Lucene.Net committer.
>>
>>
>>
>> Mike has been contributing for Lucene.Net since
Hi folks,
Happy New Year!
So what's the status of 2.9.1? Are there any outstanding issues need to be
resolved? Has folks been giving it a try?
We need to close this loose end loop and if there is no outstanding issues,
officially release Lucene.Net 2.9.1 so work can start on 3.0 and b
03, 2010 9:37 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Status of Lucene.Net 2.9.1
Are you planing a full, non-incubator release? Is there a release candidate?
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 8:32 PM, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
>
> Happy New Year!
>
>
>
> So
che.org
Subject: RE: Status of Lucene.Net 2.9.1
Maybe, this issue can be incorporated in 2.9.1
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2190
DIGY
-Original Message-----
From: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 3:32 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apa
o:gsi...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Grant Ingersoll
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 8:26 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Status of Lucene.Net 2.9.1
On Jan 3, 2010, at 8:32 PM, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
>
> Happy New Year!
>
>
>
> So what&#
-Original Message-----
From: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 3:32 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Status of Lucene.Net 2.9.1
Hi folks,
Happy New Year!
So what's the status of 2.9.1? Are there any outstanding issues need to be
xed should not be an
option.
+1 for #1
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 3:31 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Status of Lucene.Net 2.9.1
Looks like Lucene Java 2.9.2 is on its way. See:
htt
Thanks Grant!
Folks, I was away most of this past week, and my away got extended (just got
back this morning). I'm trying to catch up with my emails but it won't be
till tomorrow.
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsi...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Grant Ingersoll
Hi folks,
I just want to drop you a quick note and let you know that I have been
absent from the list due to family emergency (since early Jan). Things are
much better now and I hope to be back and active again in few days.
Regards,
-- George
Hi Folks,
The Lucene PMC has voted to accept Mike Garski as a new Lucene.Net
committer.
Please join me to congratulate and welcome Mike to Lucene.Net. He has been
an asset for Lucene.Net.
Welcome aboard Mike!
-- George
PS: Once your account creation has been confirmed, you should test it by
Hi Digy,
Thanks for updating the website for the address changes. For the changes to
show up at http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/ you need to:
Telnet to ASF (I use cygwin):
> ssh -l digy people.apache.org
> cd /www/incubator.apache.org/lucene.net
> svn up
Please g
Hi Ben,
I was suppose to clean up the incubation website
(http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/ should be removed and the context
of it should be integerated http://lucene.apache.org/ peer other
sub-graduated Lucene projects) but I got sideline with family emergency.
I'm in the process of worki
Hi Grant and all,
I will get engaged with the project again. The way I see it, by the end of
the year, we must:
1) Clean up the website, and / or
2) Create an official release off the current trunk, and
3) Sometimes next year, port the most current version of Java Lucene.
If by the end of the y
rsoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 6:59 AM
To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: gene...@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene.NET Community Status
On Oct 29, 2010, at 11:19 PM, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi Grant and all,
>
&
Let me jump in here and offer some perspective about Lucene.Net (btw,
it's not Lucene.NET :-) ). This is based on my past involvement with
the project -- since 2003 when it was on SourceForge.net and called
dotLucene.
1) Up until early this year, I have been porting and supporting
Lucene
Hi Everyone,
Rather than responding to each email, I will write up one response. The
points is in no significant order or priority.
1) IKVM: Since it doesn't give you source code, you end up with Java look
and fell, all the way from API to classes to exceptions. If this is
valuable option
nt to keep
is a bottleneck and stifles development.
If it is agreed that the thing to do is to go back to incubation and
repeat the same processes as before then I am out.
Can I ask Digy if he thinks that's a good way to go?
Ciaran
On 3 Nov 2010, at 04:06, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi Ev
eme in many people's emails, why is
there such a determined view that the search internals - the crown
jewels as described elsewhere - cannot be understood?
It may take a long time to innovate in that area but I can't see that
it is impossible.
Ciaran
On 3 Nov 2010, at 04:06, George
Hi Everyone,
Again, my apology for the long post, but like I did before, I am going to
reply in one post to answer and clarify questions around this subject --
again, my points and clarification below are in no particular order or
importance.
1) SVN: Whatever backend source repository is used, as
Hi Everyone,
Here are the actionable tasks that we need to work on. Normally, such an
email is posted on lucene-net-dev[AT]lucene.apache.org, but I'm cross
posting it to lucene-net-user[AT]lucene.apache.org as well to give it
maximum exposure. However, going forward, let us keep this discussi
For #9, you have a good point. I too was lost when I started with Lucene
and ASF. Over time I started finding my way around.
Having a wiki for Lucene.Net with how-to's would help. See the actionable
items to address this.
Thanks for making this clear.
-- George
-Original Message-
Fr
I don't mean to discourage folks by posting this, but since this topic
(IKVM) keeps coming up (we need a FAQ), here is my comment on it.
>From Lucene.Net homepage (http://lucene.apache.org/lucene.net/):
"Lucene.Net is a source code, class-per-class, API-per-API and algorithmatic
port of the Java
This topic has been coming back again and again which I have tried to
address multiple times, so let me try again.
1) Java Lucene started years before the first C# version (4+ years if I get
my history right), thus it defined and has been the definer of the
technology and the API. It is the estab
Clean up Lucene.Net website
---
Key: LUCENENET-379
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-379
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: George Aroush
The existing Lucene.Net home page
Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool
---
Key: LUCENENET-380
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: George Aroush
This task is to evaluate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
George Aroush updated LUCENENET-380:
Attachment: TestDateFilter.java
TestBufferedIndexInput.java
> Evalu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
George Aroush updated LUCENENET-380:
Attachment: QueryParser.java
NIOFSDirectory.java
Official release of Lucene.Net 2.9.2
Key: LUCENENET-381
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-381
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: George Aroush
This task is to
Create a wiki page for Lucene.Net
-
Key: LUCENENET-382
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-382
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: George Aroush
We need to create a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
George Aroush updated LUCENENET-379:
Due Date: 31/Dec/10 (was: 31/Dec/11)
> Clean up Lucene.Net webs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929568#action_12929568
]
George Aroush commented on LUCENENET-379:
-
Apache Forrest is the proper wa
31 matches
Mail list logo
