On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Granroth, Neal V.
neal.granr...@thermofisher.com wrote:
Yes I pulled from the branch not the trunk. I apparently made the
incorrect assumption that it would be slightly more stable than the
current
work-in-progress
The case of the first character of the stored term Forum and the search term
forum differ.
- Neal G.
-Original Message-
From: hotmail_288fbf38c031d...@live.com
[mailto:hotmail_288fbf38c031d...@live.com] On Behalf Of Gian Maria Ricci
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 10:11 AM
To:
Yes, this was discussed before.
No official discussions or decisions about the project should occur outside the
regular newsgroup.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 1:15 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Don't forget to tag the release in SubVersion.
The latest tag is RC3, and I assume that the trunk is the in-progress work on
version 3.0.3.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 2:26 AM
To:
2011 7:42 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
Sorry, but I feel the same as Neal.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 6:08 PM
really like to know why I
shouldn't trust anything but a line-by-line port. Can you explain a
bit?
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Granroth, Neal V.
neal.granr...@thermofisher.com wrote:
This is has been discussed many times.
Lucene.NET is not valid, the code cannot be trusted, if it is not a
line
That only works if you are *allowed* to deploy a new or updated .NET framework
on the target system, which is not always true.
But the problem is not really about deployment it is really more for those of
us who must compile from source and who are not permitted to upgrade our
development
No, the URL in DIGY's email apepars correct and the SVN revision appears to be
1086410.
Question: Should there be a tag for Lucene.Net_2_9_4 as there are for previous
release candidates?
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday,
Troy,
The source in the SVN tag does not build:
Lucene.Net.Core.sln(1): Solution file error MSB5014: File format version is not
recognized. MSBuild can only read solution files between versions 7.0 and 9.0,
inclusive.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard
I'd recommend using the description from the web-site.
---
Lucene.Net is a source code, class-per-class, API-per-API and algorithmatic
port of the Java Lucene search engine to the C# and .NET platform utilizing
Microsoft .NET Framework.
Lucene.Net sticks to the APIs and
Unfortunately no, version 2.9.2 never completed the official release process.
Version 2.0.0.4 is last version for which an official binary release is
available.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Robert Jordan (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 7:12 AM
Agreed, building Lucene.NET from the source in SVN is simple.
However my understanding is that being able to compile a tagged version of the
source does not meet the ASF criteria for a release.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Hans (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday,
As I understand it, only the official Lucene.NET committers (DIGY, George
Aroush, and Doug Sale) can commit alterations to the web site or the source.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 12:04 PM
To:
We've already been through this process once before. Why repeat?
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2010 6:38 AM
To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; Lucene mailing list
Subject:
We should not make the Lucene.NET project dependent on a specific IDE (VS2008,
VS2010, etc.) the source should builable from the tools available in the .NET
2.0 SDK or equivalent Mono tools.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Cameron (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent:
wrong.
At the time (3 years ago) I offered to spend time trying to make a set of
examples such as how to use iFilters (I think that was the term) but nobody was
interested so my attention moved elsewhere.
-Original Message-
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com
16 matches
Mail list logo