RE: Lucene.NET 3.0.3 Build issues

2012-08-13 Thread Granroth, Neal V.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Granroth, Neal V. neal.granr...@thermofisher.com wrote: Yes I pulled from the branch not the trunk. I apparently made the incorrect assumption that it would be slightly more stable than the current work-in-progress

RE: searching on NOT_ANALYZED fields seems not working.

2012-07-19 Thread Granroth, Neal V.
The case of the first character of the stored term Forum and the search term forum differ. - Neal G. -Original Message- From: hotmail_288fbf38c031d...@live.com [mailto:hotmail_288fbf38c031d...@live.com] On Behalf Of Gian Maria Ricci Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 10:11 AM To:

RE: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.net twitter account and chat room

2011-12-05 Thread Granroth, Neal V.
Yes, this was discussed before. No official discussions or decisions about the project should occur outside the regular newsgroup. - Neal -Original Message- From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 1:15 PM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org

RE: [Lucene.Net] Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4

2011-12-01 Thread Granroth, Neal V.
Don't forget to tag the release in SubVersion. The latest tag is RC3, and I assume that the trunk is the in-progress work on version 3.0.3. - Neal -Original Message- From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 2:26 AM To:

RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts

2011-09-22 Thread Granroth, Neal V.
2011 7:42 AM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts Sorry, but I feel the same as Neal. DIGY -Original Message- From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 6:08 PM

RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-29 Thread Granroth, Neal V.
really like to know why I shouldn't trust anything but a line-by-line port. Can you explain a bit? On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Granroth, Neal V. neal.granr...@thermofisher.com wrote: This is has been discussed many times. Lucene.NET is not valid, the code cannot be trusted, if it is not a line

RE: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4

2011-05-09 Thread Granroth, Neal V.
That only works if you are *allowed* to deploy a new or updated .NET framework on the target system, which is not always true. But the problem is not really about deployment it is really more for those of us who must compile from source and who are not permitted to upgrade our development

RE: [Lucene.Net] release 2.9.4

2011-04-05 Thread Granroth, Neal V.
No, the URL in DIGY's email apepars correct and the SVN revision appears to be 1086410. Question: Should there be a tag for Lucene.Net_2_9_4 as there are for previous release candidates? - Neal -Original Message- From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday,

RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2

2011-02-25 Thread Granroth, Neal V.
Troy, The source in the SVN tag does not build: Lucene.Net.Core.sln(1): Solution file error MSB5014: File format version is not recognized. MSBuild can only read solution files between versions 7.0 and 9.0, inclusive. - Neal -Original Message- From: Troy Howard

RE: Board Report Draft

2010-12-03 Thread Granroth, Neal V.
I'd recommend using the description from the web-site. --- Lucene.Net is a source code, class-per-class, API-per-API and algorithmatic port of the Java Lucene search engine to the C# and .NET platform utilizing Microsoft .NET Framework. Lucene.Net sticks to the APIs and

RE: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-384) QueryParsers exception on Windows 2008 Server

2010-12-01 Thread Granroth, Neal V.
Unfortunately no, version 2.9.2 never completed the official release process. Version 2.0.0.4 is last version for which an official binary release is available. - Neal -Original Message- From: Robert Jordan (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 7:12 AM

RE: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-384) QueryParsers exception on Windows 2008 Server

2010-12-01 Thread Granroth, Neal V.
Agreed, building Lucene.NET from the source in SVN is simple. However my understanding is that being able to compile a tagged version of the source does not meet the ASF criteria for a release. - Neal -Original Message- From: Hans (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday,

RE: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-379) Clean up Lucene.Net website

2010-11-30 Thread Granroth, Neal V.
As I understand it, only the official Lucene.NET committers (DIGY, George Aroush, and Doug Sale) can commit alterations to the web site or the source. - Neal -Original Message- From: Prescott Nasser (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 12:04 PM To:

RE: Lucene.NET Community Status

2010-11-02 Thread Granroth, Neal V.
We've already been through this process once before. Why repeat? - Neal -Original Message- From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2010 6:38 AM To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org Cc: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; Lucene mailing list Subject:

RE: [jira] Created: (LUCENENET-377) Upgrade solution to VS2010

2010-11-02 Thread Granroth, Neal V.
We should not make the Lucene.NET project dependent on a specific IDE (VS2008, VS2010, etc.) the source should builable from the tools available in the .NET 2.0 SDK or equivalent Mono tools. - Neal -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Cameron (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent:

RE: Question

2010-01-07 Thread Granroth, Neal V.
wrong. At the time (3 years ago) I offered to spend time trying to make a set of examples such as how to use iFilters (I think that was the term) but nobody was interested so my attention moved elsewhere. -Original Message- From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com