Re: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3 into trunk and other forward progress

2011-12-28 Thread Rory Plaire
bring it up. Worst case is well keep trying to > maintain a line by line and the g. Best case is we can use g as a jump > point to make it even more .net like and whatever work you do will help us > there as well > > Sent from my Windows Phone > ____ &

Re: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3 into trunk and other forward progress

2011-12-23 Thread Rory Plaire
nch - the notice issue is > > current, seems like the general incubator has been digging > > everyone for it lately. > > > > Im not sure about the anon or the generics unfortunately > > > > Sent from my Windows Phone > > ___

Re: [Lucene.Net] [jira] [Resolved] (LUCENENET-412) Replacing ArrayLists, Hashtables etc. with appropriate Generics.

2011-12-22 Thread Rory Plaire
What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-434? -r On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Digy (Resolved) (JIRA) wrote: > > 2.9.4g is ready to go > DIGY >

Re: [Lucene.Net] Merge 3.0.3 into trunk and other forward progress

2011-12-22 Thread Rory Plaire
I was just looking at the issues for 2.9.4g since I have a bit of time to put against them in the coming week. They are here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET/fixforversion/12316479. Are these current? If so I can just keep going in the direction DIGY set to help close them. -r On

Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-07-01 Thread Rory Plaire
gs off or create a > separate ticket that links back to to the main one. > > > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Rory Plaire wrote: > > > @Michael - > > > > Should that list be in JIRA? It would be easier to manage, I think... > > > > If yes,

Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-30 Thread Rory Plaire
gt; > > moment. > > > > > > > > Most of the tests avoid anything that remotely looks like it knows > > about > > > > the > > > > DRY principle and there is a static constructor in the core test case > > > that > > > >

Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-30 Thread Rory Plaire
I don't want to drag this out much longer, but I am curious with people who hold the "line-by-line" sentiment - are you NHibernate users? -r On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Noel Lysaght wrote: > Can I just plug in my bit and say I agree 100% with what Moray has outlined > below. > > If we move

Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-29 Thread Rory Plaire
ot;easy" or "manageable" or "worth doing". > > As always, if you want the code base to be something specific, submit a > patch for that, and it will be. If not, then you need to convince someone > else to write that patch. And just so it's clear, *anyone

Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-29 Thread Rory Plaire
For what it's worth, I've participated in a number of projects which have been "ported" from Java to .Net with varying levels of "translation" into the native style and functionalty of the .Net framework. The largest are NTS, a JTS port and NHibernate, a Java Hibernate port. My experience is that a

RE: [Lucene.Net] Could not load assembly

2011-06-11 Thread Rory Plaire
The easiest way to diagnose these issues is to run fuslogvw.exe from the .Net SDK command line and choose to log bind failures. Fusion, the .Net loader, gives a wealth of info about these kind of failures. After you setup the logging, run the test to failure again; the log should then point to the

Re: [Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-412) Replacing ArrayLists, Hashtables etc. with appropriate Generics.

2011-05-17 Thread Rory Plaire
This is a great improvement, but why not also remove the braces and returns? var cache = new FilterCache(deletesMode, (reader, docIdSet) => new FilteredDocIdSet( (DocIdSet)docIdSet, docid => !reader.IsDeleted(docid))); On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Digy (JIRA) wrote: > >[ > https: