Since it includes some level of divergence from java I committed it to only
2.9.4g branch.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1930
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431
DIGY
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
> Ok, core compiles, and all tests pass
You are right. I forgot to add a patch related with type-casting.
Summary of the long story:
Since CharArraySet inherits from Hashtable, some unimplemented methods such
as Add(object,object) refer to the base class(Hashtable) which is wrong.
Also calling GetEnumerator() using the
System.Collecti
I've never committed any code to 2.9.4g branch before testing. So, It should
pass all the tests.
DIGY
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> Does anyone have the latest 2.9.4g branch they can run the tests on - I've
> done some WP7 stuff, and I'm coming up with 6 errors throu
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Andy Pook wrote:
> It'd be useful if There was a StopAnalyzer ctor overload that took an
> IEnumerable and maybe the current one that takes List
> should
> be ICollection (same as internal stopWords member).
> Just gives a little flexibility on the types that can
just aesthetical reasons. See the java code
cache = new FilterCache(deletesMode) {
@Override
public DocIdSet mergeDeletes(final IndexReader r, final DocIdSet
docIdSet) {
return new FilteredDocIdSet(docIdSet) {
@Override
protected boolean match(int docI
http://www.devatwork.nl/articles/lucenenet/faceted-search-and-drill-down-lucenenet/
DIGY
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:40 AM, K a r n a v wrote:
> How can we implement faceted search with lucene
>
o be 1086410.
> >>
> >> Question: Should there be a tag for Lucene.Net_2_9_4 as there are for
> previous release candidates?
> >>
> >> - Neal
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gma
Sorry, no binaries. You can download the source from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/C#/src/Lucene.Net
DIGY
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Wyatt Barnett wrote:
> Actually about to dive into a big search tweaking spike in a certain
> project here, happy to do it on 2
It would be better to attach the patches to the issue before committing.
So others can track what is going on.
DIGY
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 9:20 AM, wrote:
> Author: slombard
> Date: Sat Mar 12 07:20:44 2011
> New Revision: 1080881
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1080881&view=rev
> Lo
Well, not really "core".
Codes under Analyzer(by DIGY) can be moved to /src/contrib/analyzers (but
they are not ports from java).
The others(by M.GARSKI) are extensions to the core(something like
Lucene.Net.Core.Extensions)
DIGY
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Troy Howard wrote:
> Yeah -- I a
0
".Net"s seem to be redundant under /src/contrib/ . It could be something
like
Analyzers
Highlighter
Similarity
...
(Maybe, we should find a different name for contrib.net. It contains
"contributions specific to Lucene.Net which are not available in
Lucene.java)
DIGY
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at
+1
DIGY
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Troy Howard wrote:
> +1 to all suggestions. Hudkins is my new favourite word. ;)
>
> One quick concern I have, is how much of the things listed are already
> available on the Apache hudson server? A lot of this is .NET specific, so
> unlikely that it wil
+1
DIGY
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Glyn Darkin wrote:
> +1
> On 28 Feb 2011, at 08:39, Troy Howard wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > A quick voting reminder... This [VOTE] thread will only be active for
> > another 4 hours (72 hours total).
> >
> > So far, we have two +1 votes in.
> >
> > After th
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Troy Howard wrote:
> DIGY - Extracting the public key out is generally only used for delay
> signing.
In my senario, public key will not be used in delay signing. Just for
validating the assembly by comparing the public key in assembly with the
public key file i
Lucene.Net users sometimes discuss the same issue in both JIRA and dev
mailing list. And people mostly don't subscribe to commit list(I wouldn't
also subscribe to commit-list, if I weren't a committer since it is full of
spam :) ).
So I would prefer leaving it as is.
DIGY
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at
I am the current moderator of the mailing lists. It is not much work than
"reply" or "delete"
but having more than one moderator would be good.
DIGY
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the proposal says to keep the current lists and I think that's fine.
> Still
I think I don't have write access to "../incubator/lucene.net".
Since when I try to commit README.TXT as a test, I get the following error.
"access to '/repos/asf/!svn/ver/897426/incubator/lucene.net/README.txt'
forbidden".
DIGY
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
ns made by Lucene.Net users, not as
a Lucene.Net project.
DIGY
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi DIGY
>
> On 2011-01-28, digy digy wrote:
>
> > * Java's bytecode doesn't contain metadata about generics and when Java
> is
> > com
Hi Stefan,
* Java's bytecode doesn't contain metadata about generics and when Java is
compiled, all info about generics gets lost. So, IKVMed Lucene.Net will have
to live without generics.
* IKVM is the java world in .NET runtime in fact. If you are , for ex, to
write an analyzer, you have to ov
using JIRA ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa ) , you
can create an issue and add your code to that.
DIGY
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Jörg Lang wrote:
> Hi
>
> I started looking into Lucence, as I might need it on a project. As there
> was no GermanAnalyzer in the dotN
No pre/post processing involved. They are just to see how the output of
these tools looks like.
DIGY
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> Also, was there any pre/post processing involved in these files? Was it
> manual / scripts etc? Just trying to get a feel for the work
just string comparison:
'2' < 'N'
'*' < '2'
DIGY
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Ayende Rahien wrote:
> I am seeing something strange with range queries:
>
> This works:
> Created:[20100730100201790 TO NULL]
> This returns no results:
> Created:[20100730100201790 TO *]
>
> This return no resul
Please see the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-51
> Hoss Man commented on LUCENENET-51:
> this is known behavior in the Java library due to the fact that there is no
> "clean" way to let an analyzer process a prefix (or fuzzy or wildcard) query
> ... it is covered in the FA
I'd prefer "single issue with three patches".
DIGY
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Andy Pook wrote:
> Subscribed
>
> 1- Ah, hadn't spotted ISerializable. However, the recommendation for
> combining ISerializable and sealed classes is to use private instead
> of protected. (
> http://msdn.micros
Congrats Mike, Welcome aboard.
DIGY
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:07 AM, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> The Lucene PMC has voted to accept Mike Garski as a new Lucene.Net
> committer.
>
> Please join me to congratulate and welcome Mike to Lucene.Net. He has been
> an asset for Lucene.Net.
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
