@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
@Rory,
Jira in the past had the ability to create sub tasks or convert a current
task to a sub task. I'm guessing that apache's jira should be able to do
that.
@All,
I've add a Paths Class under the Lucene.Net.Tests Util
and replacing trunk with 2.9.4g?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:36 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
DIGY - Re: Why do I wait.. That's
-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
DIGY - Re: Why do I wait.. That's mostly because I intend to make some
deep
changes, which would make merging the 2.9.4g branch back to trunk
difficult.
So, it's easier to merge those changes first
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Yes. But if there are commits to trunk before that happens it's a merge.
-T
On Jul 2, 2011 1:53 PM, Digy digyd...@gmail.com wrote:
Troy,
What do you mean by merging? 2.9.4g is a superset of 2.9.4 and has
* bux fixes like
-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port
needed?
Scott -
The idea of the automated port is still worth doing. Perhaps it
makes
sense
for someone more passionate about the line-by-line idea to do that
work
: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port
needed?
Scott -
The idea of the automated port is still worth doing. Perhaps it
makes
sense
for someone more passionate about the line-by-line idea to do
that
work?
I would say, focus
: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
Sent: 29 June 2011 20:47
To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
This is has been discussed many times.
Lucene.NET is not valid
Message-
From: Moray McConnachie
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 10:25 AM
To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
I don't think I'm as hard core on this as Neal, but remember: the
history
: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
I don't want to drag this out much longer, but I am curious with people who
hold the line-by-line sentiment - are you NHibernate users?
-r
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Noel Lysaght lysag...@hotmail.com wrote:
Can I just plug in my bit
NHibernate has a much bigger community and more active devs afaict.
The proposed changes as I understand them are not about changing class
structure or APIs, but merely touch hunks of code and rewrite them to
use better .NET practices (yield, generics, LINQ etc). In conjunction
with a move
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 10:47 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Michael,
I agree with everything you said. My point in saying whoever commits code
wins was to illustrate the reality of how and why
), then commit.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 11:58 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
@Troy,
I've already started working
: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Michael,
I agree with everything you said. My point in saying whoever commits code
wins was to illustrate the reality of how and why the project has the
current form.
Building consensus is difficult. It is an essential first
PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Michael,
You interpret the report as whoever commits code wins? But when I look
at it, I see a lof of talk, no work. .Net community is not interested
in
contributing.
I
is I did it that way, should we continue with this.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 10:47 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed
: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Scott -
The idea of the automated port is still worth doing. Perhaps it makes sense
for someone more passionate about the line-by-line idea to do that work?
I would say, focus on what makes sense to you. Being productive, regardless
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Scott -
The idea of the automated port is still worth doing. Perhaps it makes sense
for someone more passionate about the line-by-line idea to do that work?
I would say, focus on what makes sense to you. Being
For what it's worth, I've participated in a number of projects which have
been ported from Java to .Net with varying levels of translation into
the native style and functionalty of the .Net framework. The largest are
NTS, a JTS port and NHibernate, a Java Hibernate port. My experience is that
a
-Original Message-
From: Rory Plaire [mailto:codekai...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 1:06 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
For what it's worth, I've participated in a number of projects which have
been
and run
correctly.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 2:57 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
Those are pretty strong words -- I'd
Of course I'd love to contribute. I'm hopeful I can spend even a few hours a
week doing this when (if...) my people adopt NHibernate.Search.
Troy, I'm going to defer to your sense that there is enough interest and
support from the community to maintain both code bases. It is hard, however,
to
21 matches
Mail list logo