RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-07-02 Thread Digy
@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? @Rory, Jira in the past had the ability to create sub tasks or convert a current task to a sub task. I'm guessing that apache's jira should be able to do that. @All, I've add a Paths Class under the Lucene.Net.Tests Util

RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-07-02 Thread Digy
and replacing trunk with 2.9.4g? DIGY -Original Message- From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:36 AM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? DIGY - Re: Why do I wait.. That's

RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-07-02 Thread Troy Howard
-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? DIGY - Re: Why do I wait.. That's mostly because I intend to make some deep changes, which would make merging the 2.9.4g branch back to trunk difficult. So, it's easier to merge those changes first

RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-07-02 Thread Digy
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? Yes. But if there are commits to trunk before that happens it's a merge. -T On Jul 2, 2011 1:53 PM, Digy digyd...@gmail.com wrote: Troy, What do you mean by merging? 2.9.4g is a superset of 2.9.4 and has * bux fixes like

Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-07-01 Thread Rory Plaire
-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? Scott - The idea of the automated port is still worth doing. Perhaps it makes sense for someone more passionate about the line-by-line idea to do that work

Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-07-01 Thread Michael Herndon
: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? Scott - The idea of the automated port is still worth doing. Perhaps it makes sense for someone more passionate about the line-by-line idea to do that work? I would say, focus

RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-30 Thread Moray McConnachie
: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com] Sent: 29 June 2011 20:47 To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? This is has been discussed many times. Lucene.NET is not valid

Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-30 Thread Noel Lysaght
Message- From: Moray McConnachie Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 10:25 AM To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? I don't think I'm as hard core on this as Neal, but remember: the history

RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-30 Thread Ayende Rahien
: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? I don't want to drag this out much longer, but I am curious with people who hold the line-by-line sentiment - are you NHibernate users? -r On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Noel Lysaght lysag...@hotmail.com wrote: Can I just plug in my bit

Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-30 Thread Itamar Syn-Hershko
NHibernate has a much bigger community and more active devs afaict. The proposed changes as I understand them are not about changing class structure or APIs, but merely touch hunks of code and rewrite them to use better .NET practices (yield, generics, LINQ etc). In conjunction with a move

RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-30 Thread Digy
...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 10:47 PM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? Michael, I agree with everything you said. My point in saying whoever commits code wins was to illustrate the reality of how and why

RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-30 Thread Digy
), then commit. DIGY -Original Message- From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 11:58 PM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? @Troy, I've already started working

Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-30 Thread Troy Howard
: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? Michael, I agree with everything you said. My point in saying whoever commits code wins was to illustrate the reality of how and why the project has the current form. Building consensus is difficult. It is an essential first

Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-30 Thread Troy Howard
PM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? Michael, You interpret the report as whoever commits code wins? But when I look at it, I see a lof of talk, no work. .Net community is not interested in contributing. I

Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-30 Thread Troy Howard
is I did it that way, should we continue with this. DIGY -Original Message- From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 10:47 PM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed

RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-30 Thread Digy
: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? Scott - The idea of the automated port is still worth doing. Perhaps it makes sense for someone more passionate about the line-by-line idea to do that work? I would say, focus on what makes sense to you. Being productive, regardless

Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-30 Thread Rory Plaire
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? Scott - The idea of the automated port is still worth doing. Perhaps it makes sense for someone more passionate about the line-by-line idea to do that work? I would say, focus on what makes sense to you. Being

Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-29 Thread Rory Plaire
For what it's worth, I've participated in a number of projects which have been ported from Java to .Net with varying levels of translation into the native style and functionalty of the .Net framework. The largest are NTS, a JTS port and NHibernate, a Java Hibernate port. My experience is that a

RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-29 Thread Digy
-Original Message- From: Rory Plaire [mailto:codekai...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 1:06 AM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? For what it's worth, I've participated in a number of projects which have been

RE: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-29 Thread Granroth, Neal V.
and run correctly. - Neal -Original Message- From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 2:57 PM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed? Those are pretty strong words -- I'd

Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?

2011-06-29 Thread Rory Plaire
Of course I'd love to contribute. I'm hopeful I can spend even a few hours a week doing this when (if...) my people adopt NHibernate.Search. Troy, I'm going to defer to your sense that there is enough interest and support from the community to maintain both code bases. It is hard, however, to