What does exactly happen with three words or more when we do a proximity
search?
such as: "lucene jakarta best"~10
Is each word can be at a distance of 10 of each others, or is there an
other behaviour?
By the way, I would like to know if someone use this lucene feature
regularly?
For my par
On Jun 9, 2004, at 4:26 AM, gaudinat wrote:
What does exactly happen with three words or more when we do a
proximity search?
such as: "lucene jakarta best"~10
Is each word can be at a distance of 10 of each others, or is there
an other behaviour?
The total number of "hops" to put the words in o
On Jun 8, 2004, at 10:55 PM, Don Gilbert wrote:
Find this as part of the 'LuceGene' package for searching
genome and bioinformatics databases at http://www.gmod.org/lucegene/
with lucene related source code in cvs here:
Nice stuff!
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/gmod/lucegene/src/org/eugenes
On Jun 9, 2004, at 4:26 AM, gaudinat wrote:
What does exactly happen with three words or more when we do a
proximity search?
such as: "lucene jakarta best"~10
Is each word can be at a distance of 10 of each others, or is there
an other behaviour?
The total number of "hops" to put the words in o
This poses a couple of additional questions:
1) If you set the default slop factor in QueryProcessor to something greater
than 1, can you also use wildcards? (I ask that question because, to my
understanding, you can't combine the explicit proximity query syntax with
wildcards. That is, somethin
On Jun 9, 2004, at 8:53 AM, Terry Steichen wrote:
1) If you set the default slop factor in QueryProcessor to something
greater
than 1, can you also use wildcards? (I ask that question because, to
my
understanding, you can't combine the explicit proximity query syntax
with
wildcards. That is, s
On Jun 9, 2004, at 8:53 AM, Terry Steichen wrote:
3) Is there a plan for adding QueryParser support for the SpanQuery
family?
Another important facet to Terry's question here is what syntax to use
to express all various types of queries? I suspect that Google stats
show us that most folks query
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Jun 9, 2004, at 8:53 AM, Terry Steichen wrote:
3) Is there a plan for adding QueryParser support for the SpanQuery
family?
Another important facet to Terry's question here is what syntax to use
to express all various types of queries? I suspect that Google stats
And other
Hello,
I'm using lucene 1.4 rc2 and I've come across a problem using exact
phrase queries as
part of a composite query.
A little background on the problem:
We have two fields in the index:
title: Field.Text (tokenized)
journal: Field.Keyword
When doing an exact phrase query on the title th
Erik,
Thanks for the comments.
> I'm particularly interested in the XPath stuff I saw in LGQueryParser.
* xpathFieldParse
'xpath' parser: param allfields[], with query or field[] possibly
having wild-card notation: *.start annotation.*.text
allowing '/' and '.' field sepa
On Jun 9, 2004, at 12:21 PM, David Spencer wrote:
show us that most folks query with 1 - 3 words and do not use the any
of the advanced features.
But with automagic query expansion these things might be done behind
the scenes. Nutch, for one, expands simple queries to check against
multiple fi
On Jun 9, 2004, at 12:25 PM, Michael Duval wrote:
When doing an exact phrase query on the title the expected results are
returned:
+(title:"Mass Asymmetry")
after tokenizing/filtering: +title:"mass asymmetri"
returns 20 Hits
example hit: "Mass asymmetry, equation of state, and nuc
Hi,
Very nice, thank you! I finally got around writing a filter to handle
date ranges in MMDD format and it seems to work fine. I basically
adapted the DateFilter code for my purposes. I was wondering if
someone could quickly review the code and tell me if I am missing
something. Tha
sorry, but i forgot how to get removed from the mailing list?
help.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 15:39, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> On Jun 9, 2004, at 8:53 AM, Terry Steichen wrote:
> > 3) Is there a plan for adding QueryParser support for the SpanQuery
> > family?
>
> Another important facet to Terry's question here is what syntax to use
> to express all various types of q
You created your own answer by sending a mail to this list..
Look at the mail footer..
Mvgr,
Martin
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 20:29, Nguyen, Tri (NIH/NLM/LHC) wrote:
> sorry, but i forgot how to get removed from the mailing list?
>
> help.
>
> --
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Jun 9, 2004, at 12:21 PM, David Spencer wrote:
show us that most folks query with 1 - 3 words and do not use the
any of the advanced features.
But with automagic query expansion these things might be done behind
the scenes. Nutch, for one, expands simple queries to check
I am working on a UI to allow a user to build a search query. The user
creates individual "clauses", each of which is basically a simple search
query. The user selects boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT), to connect these
clauses. When the user is finished constructing the search, there will be N
clau
Hi,
I noticed that if I append a * to the words, create, created, creating,
creates, etc. then the search does not return the expected document. But
if I use creat* then the search does return the expected document.
I would like to be able to use the complete words and append a wildcard
to the
Well, I can offer you advice on 2 fronts:
1) I recommend against using the QueryParser unless you have nothing to add
to the users input. In my situation, I was generating Lucene query object
using the query parser. It was kind of cumbersome because I was doing
things like joining some terms wi
I believe I covered this in a Lucene FAQ entry at jGuru.
Otis
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that if I append a * to the words, create, created,
> creating,
> creates, etc. then the search does not return the expected document.
> But
> if I use creat* then the search does retu
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:41:55PM -0400, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> On Jun 9, 2004, at 12:25 PM, Michael Duval wrote:
> >When doing an exact phrase query on the title the expected results are
> >returned:
> >
> > +(title:"Mass Asymmetry")
> > after tokenizing/filtering: +title:"mass asymmetri"
Any one have built lucene for Devnagari UNICODE search? PLZ help me wht
kind of changes i have to do in lucene.
Also if any one have built StandardTokenizer,Analyzer,Stemmer,Indexer
,queryParser for Hindi & Marathi Plz let me know.
Thanks,
Satish.
-
23 matches
Mail list logo
