On Feb 22, 2005, at 8:50 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: >>> Just curious: it would seem easier to use multiple fields for the
: >>> original case and lowercase searching. Is there any particular
reason
: >>> you analyzed the documents to multiple indexes instead of
multiple
: >>> fields?
: >>
: >>
: >>> Just curious: it would seem easier to use multiple fields for the
: >>> original case and lowercase searching. Is there any particular reason
: >>> you analyzed the documents to multiple indexes instead of multiple
: >>> fields?
: >>
: >> I considered that approach, however to expose QueryPa
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:31, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> You are right.
> Since there are C++ and now C ports of Lucene, it would be interesting
> to integrate them directly with DBs, so that the RDBMS full-text search
> under the hood is actually powered by one of the Lucene ports.
Or to see Lucene +
Responding to this posts. Please disreguard.
Sorry.
- Original Message -
From: "Luke Shannon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List"
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 5:16 PM
Subject: MultiField Queries without the QueryParser
> Hello;
>
> The book meantions the MultiFieldQueryPa
Hello;
The book meantions the MultiFieldQueryParser as one way of dealing with
multifield queries. Can someone point me in the direction of other ways?
Thanks,
Luke
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
John Wang wrote:
Hi David:
Can you further explain which calls specically would solve my problem?
Not in depth but anyway:
Examine the output of Explanation.toHtml() and/or
Explanation.toString(). Does it contain the info you want..if so call
the other Explanation methods and/or dig into the
Hi David:
Can you further explain which calls specically would solve my problem?
Thanks
-John
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:20:15 -0800, David Spencer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Wang wrote:
>
> > Anyone has any thoughts on this?
>
> Does this help?
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/do
Todd VanderVeen wrote:
I would be careful using wildcards as proposed. They can be inefficient
(particularly in a list of disjunctions) but even more importantly you
are excluding more than the 3 names. Your results won't be consistent
with your intent.
In the new version of Luke (the tool) you
