Re: GETVALUES +SEARCH

2004-12-01 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Dec 1, 2004, at 2:59 PM, petite_abeille wrote: On Dec 01, 2004, at 20:43, Erik Hatcher wrote: Sure, I could put it all together as a space separated String and use the WhitespaceAnalyzer, but why not do it this way? What other suggestions do you have for doing this? If this works for you, I d

Re: GETVALUES +SEARCH

2004-12-01 Thread petite_abeille
On Dec 01, 2004, at 21:14, Chris Hostetter wrote: The real question in my mind is not "how should we impliment 'get' given that we allow multiple values?", a better question is "how should we impliment 'put'?" Yes, retrofitting Document.add() in the Map interface would be a pain. But this is not

Re: GETVALUES +SEARCH

2004-12-01 Thread Chris Hostetter
: > Having Document implement Map sounds reasonable to me though. Any : > reasons not to do this? : : Not really, except perhaps that a Lucene Document could theoretically : have multiple identical keys... not something that anyone would want to Assuming you want all changes to be backwards comp

Re: GETVALUES +SEARCH

2004-12-01 Thread petite_abeille
On Dec 01, 2004, at 20:43, Erik Hatcher wrote: Sure, I could put it all together as a space separated String and use the WhitespaceAnalyzer, but why not do it this way? What other suggestions do you have for doing this? If this works for you, I don't see any problem with it. In general, I avoi

Re: GETVALUES +SEARCH

2004-12-01 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Dec 1, 2004, at 2:21 PM, petite_abeille wrote: On Dec 01, 2004, at 20:06, Erik Hatcher wrote: I also extensively use multiple fields of the same name. Odd... on the other hand... perhaps this is "une affaire de gout"... There are some places I use this for convenience, and another where it seem

Re: GETVALUES +SEARCH

2004-12-01 Thread petite_abeille
On Dec 01, 2004, at 20:06, Erik Hatcher wrote: I also extensively use multiple fields of the same name. Odd... on the other hand... perhaps this is "une affaire de gout"... So does this rule out implementing the Map interface on Document? Why? Nobody mentioned what value such a Map would hold... i

Re: GETVALUES +SEARCH

2004-12-01 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Dec 1, 2004, at 1:31 PM, Luke Francl wrote: On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 11:12, petite_abeille wrote: Not really, except perhaps that a Lucene Document could theoretically have multiple identical keys... not something that anyone would want to do though :o) And why not? I use this to store closed capt

Re: GETVALUES +SEARCH

2004-12-01 Thread Luke Francl
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 11:12, petite_abeille wrote: > Not really, except perhaps that a Lucene Document could theoretically > have multiple identical keys... not something that anyone would want to > do though :o) And why not? I use this to store closed captioned text. Each entry must be stored s

Re: GETVALUES +SEARCH

2004-12-01 Thread petite_abeille
On Dec 01, 2004, at 18:05, Erik Hatcher wrote: Having Hits implement List sounds nice, but it could not function by itself if the backing IndexSearcher/IndexReader is closed or is not accessible. Wouldn't it be too tempting for naive users to consider passing this List around between tiers and

Re: GETVALUES +SEARCH

2004-12-01 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Dec 1, 2004, at 7:44 AM, petite_abeille wrote: We create a ArrayList Object and Load all the Hit Values into them and return the same for Display purpose on a Servlet. Talking of which... It would be very handy if org.apache.lucene.search.Hits would implement the java.util.List interface..

Re: GETVALUES +SEARCH

2004-12-01 Thread petite_abeille
On Dec 01, 2004, at 13:37, Karthik N S wrote: We create a ArrayList Object and Load all the Hit Values into them and return the same for Display purpose on a Servlet. Talking of which... It would be very handy if org.apache.lucene.search.Hits would implement the java.util.List interface... in

Re: GETVALUES +SEARCH

2004-12-01 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Dec 1, 2004, at 7:37 AM, Karthik N S wrote: We create a ArrayList Object and Load all the Hit Values into them and return the same for Display purpose on a Servlet. On the servlet we track the server side created ArrayList for Required number of dispalys. [ At any time we have to have

RE: GETVALUES +SEARCH

2004-12-01 Thread Karthik N S
er [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 4:04 PM To: Lucene Users List Subject: Re: GETVALUES +SEARCH On Dec 1, 2004, at 12:41 AM, Karthik N S wrote: >Is there any API in Lucene Which can retrieve all the searched > Values in > single fetch > >in

Re: GETVALUES +SEARCH

2004-12-01 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Dec 1, 2004, at 12:41 AM, Karthik N S wrote: Is there any API in Lucene Which can retrieve all the searched Values in single fetch into some sort of an 'Array' WITHOUT using this [ below ] Looping process [ This would make the Search and display more Faster ]. for (int i = 0; i

RE: GETVALUES +SEARCH

2004-11-30 Thread Karthik N S
Users List Subject: Re: GETVALUES +SEARCH On Nov 30, 2004, at 7:10 AM, Karthik N S wrote: > On Search API the command [ package > org.apache.lucene.document.Document ] > > Will this'public final String[] getValues(String name)' return > me > all the docs with

Re: GETVALUES +SEARCH

2004-11-30 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Nov 30, 2004, at 7:10 AM, Karthik N S wrote: On Search API the command [ package org.apache.lucene.document.Document ] Will this'public final String[] getValues(String name)' return me all the docs with out looping thru ? getValues(fieldName) returns a String[] of the values of the

GETVALUES +SEARCH

2004-11-30 Thread Karthik N S
Hi Guys Apologies. On Search API the command [ package org.apache.lucene.document.Document ] Will this'public final String[] getValues(String name)' return me all the docs with out looping thru ? Please Explaine with example. Thx in advance WITH WARM REGA