One more bit of info that I should have included:
The randomly generated documents consisted of 2 fields, one Text with 3 words, and one
UnStored with 500 words. Average word length was 7 characters.
If Otis (he wrote it, I just made a tweak or two) doesn't mind, I'll post the source
code.
Otis doesn't mind.
--- Armbrust, Daniel C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more bit of info that I should have included:
The randomly generated documents consisted of 2 fields, one Text with
3 words, and one UnStored with 500 words. Average word length was 7
characters.
If Otis (he wrote
-Original Message-
From: Armbrust, Daniel C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 2:47 PM
To: 'Lucene Users List'
Subject: Lucene Speed under diff JVMs
This may be of use to people who want to make lucene index faster.
Also, I'm curious as to what JVM most people
This may be of use to people who want to make lucene index faster. Also, I'm curious
as to what JVM most people run Lucene under, and if anyone else has seen results like
this:
I'm using the class that Otis wrote (see message from about 3 weeks ago) for testing
the scalability of lucene (more
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Armbrust, Daniel C. wrote:
I'm using the class that Otis wrote (see message from about 3 weeks ago)
for testing the scalability of lucene (more results on that later) and I
May I ask you where one can get the source code? I cannot find it in
archive. Thank you
-g-
--
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Armbrust, Daniel C. wrote:
I'm using the class that Otis wrote (see message from about 3 weeks ago)
for testing the scalability of lucene (more results on that later) and I
first tried running it under different versions of Java, to see where it
runs the fastest. The
