Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Oct 21, 2004, at 5:38 AM, sergiu gordea wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I don't like the idea of users having to know how a field was
indexed though. That seems to defeat the purpose of a
general-purpose QueryParser.
Erik
I agree that, but maybe lucene should provide some
On Oct 21, 2004, at 5:38 AM, sergiu gordea wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I don't like the idea of users having to know how a field was indexed
though. That seems to defeat the purpose of a general-purpose
QueryParser.
Erik
I agree that, but maybe lucene should provide some subclasses of
Query
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I don't like the idea of users having to know how a field was indexed
though. That seems to defeat the purpose of a general-purpose
QueryParser.
Erik
I agree that, but maybe lucene should provide some subclasses of
QueryParser that should deal this problems.
I'm just a
I don't like the idea of users having to know how a field was indexed
though. That seems to defeat the purpose of a general-purpose
QueryParser.
Erik
On Oct 21, 2004, at 2:38 AM, Morus Walter wrote:
Erik Hatcher writes:
however perhaps it should be. Or perhaps there are other options t
Erik Hatcher writes:
> however perhaps it should be. Or perhaps there are other options to
> solve this recurring dilemma folks have with Field.Keyword indexed
> fields and QueryParser?
>
I think one could introduce a special syntax in query parser for
keyword fields. Query parser wouldn't ana
rstand the problem correctly ...
All the best,
Sergiu
Aviran
http://aviran.mordos.com
-Original Message-
From: Morus Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 2:25 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Null or no analyzer
Aviran writes:
You can
t;
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Aviran
>>> http://aviran.mordos.com
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Morus Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 2:25 AM
>>> To: Lucene Users List
>>>
x27;t understand the problem correctly ...
All the best,
Sergiu
Aviran
http://aviran.mordos.com
-Original Message-
From: Morus Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 2:25 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Null or no analyzer
Aviran writes:
You can use WhiteSp
is is something that the query parser is already geared up to do
regards
Rupinder
>-Original Message-
>From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 20 October 2004 16:29
>To: Lucene Users List
>Subject: Re: Null or no analyzer
>
>
>
>On Oct 20, 2004
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 2:25 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Null or no analyzer
Aviran writes:
You can use WhiteSpaceAnalyzer
Can he? If "Elections 2004" is one token in the subject field
(keyword),
this will fail, since WhiteSpeceAnalyzer will tokenize
AFIK if the term "Election 2004" will be between quotation marks this should
work fine.
Aviran
http://aviran.mordos.com
-Original Message-
From: Morus Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 2:25 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Null or n
nt: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 11:23 AM
> To: Lucene Users List
> Subject: Null or no analyzer
>
>
> Hi All
>
> I have a question regarding selection of Analyzer's during query parsing
>
>
> i have three field in my index db_id, full_text, subject
> all
You can use WhiteSpaceAnalyzer
Aviran
http://aviran.mordos.com
-Original Message-
From: Rupinder Singh Mazara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 11:23 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Null or no analyzer
Hi All
I have a question regarding selection of
Hi All
I have a question regarding selection of Analyzer's during query parsing
i have three field in my index db_id, full_text, subject
all three are indexed, however while indexing I specified to lucene to
index db_id and subject but not tokenize them
I want to give a single search bo
14 matches
Mail list logo