limited.
John.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 1:23 AM
Subject: RE: Lucene vs. MySQL Full-Text
I also question whether it could handle extreme volume with such good query
speed.
Has anyone done numbers with
I also question whether it could handle extreme volume with such good query
speed.
Has anyone done numbers with 1+ million documents?
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Naber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 5:44 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Lucene vs. MySQL
8:55 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Lucene vs. MySQL Full-Text
On Jul 20, 2004, at 12:29 PM, Tim Brennan wrote:
Someone came into my office today and asked me about the project I am
trying to Lucene for -- "why aren't you just using a MySQL full-text
index to do that" -- after th
eater
performance on the type of search we do.
Anson
-Original Message-
From: Florian Sauvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 8:55 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Lucene vs. MySQL Full-Text
On Jul 20, 2004, at 12:29 PM, Tim Brennan wrote:
> Someone came into m
On Jul 20, 2004, at 12:29 PM, Tim Brennan wrote:
Someone came into my office today and asked me about the project I am
trying to Lucene for -- "why aren't you just using a MySQL full-text
index to do that" -- after thinking about it for a few minutes, I
realized I don't have a great answer.
MySQL b
On Tuesday 20 July 2004 21:29, Tim Brennan wrote:
> ÂDoes anyone out there have
> anything more concrete they can add?
Stemming is still on the MySQL TODO list:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/Fulltext_TODO.html
Also, for most people it's easier to extend Lucene than MySQL (as MySQL is
writt
Someone came into my office today and asked me about the project I am
trying to Lucene for -- "why aren't you just using a MySQL full-text
index to do that" -- after thinking about it for a few minutes, I
realized I don't have a great answer.
MySQL builds inverted indexes for (in theory) doing th
tober 11, 2002 9:03 PM
Subject: lucene vs mysql
> I'm currently using mysql for storing file which I index previously with
> lucene. I've seen there is a new function in mysql which consists in
> full text searching.
> I'd like to know which is best between mysql f
Le ven 11/10/2002 à 21:03, Cédric Grun a écrit :
> I'm currently using mysql for storing file which I index previously with
> lucene. I've seen there is a new function in mysql which consists in
> full text searching.
> I'd like to know which is best between mysql full text search and lucene
>
MySQL - not sure. Let us know if you test both.
Locking - sequential.
Otis
--- Cédric_Grun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm currently using mysql for storing file which I index previously
> with
> lucene. I've seen there is a new function in mysql which consists in
> full text searching.
> I'
I'm currently using mysql for storing file which I index previously with
lucene. I've seen there is a new function in mysql which consists in
full text searching.
I'd like to know which is best between mysql full text search and lucene
search.
I'm also interesting to know how lucene perform lo
11 matches
Mail list logo
