Hi!
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 05:35:36PM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> Well, my little trick isn't working right now. I'm not sure how to debug
> this.
With Lustre, the MDS authorizes access when a client first touches a certain
file. Once it's cached, the client handles authorization itself. If y
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> Well, my little trick isn't working right now. I'm not sure how to debug
> this.
>
> > remove all the default ACLs, it still works. Is there something that I am
> > doing wrong that the behavior is not what I expect from other filesystems?
Regarding
Well, my little trick isn't working right now. I'm not sure how to debug
this.
Robert LeBlanc
Life Sciences & Undergraduate Education Computer Support
Brigham Young University
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> We are running 1.8.0.180 and seem to have an issue with ACLs t
On 2009-10-26, at 08:53, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 09:52 -0500, Dr. Hung-Sheng Tsao wrote:
>> I try to setup lustre in vbox env
>> I can do rhel5.3 and lustre1.8.1.1
>> what is better way to test ofed ?
>
> Hrm. I'm not really sure what you are asking here given that VBox
>
We are running 1.8.0.180 and seem to have an issue with ACLs that I hope
someone can help us with. We have ACLs enabled on Lustre and can write them
and read them just fine. However, Lustre does not seems to respect ACLs like
Linux should. An example:
drwxrwx---+ 3 user1 root 4.0K 2009
Hi,
I had similar problem just three weeks ago on our Lustre 1.6.6 RHEL4.
It all started with several "lvbo_init failed for resource" messages
appearing in the syslogs every night.
As far as I know it means that you have files with missing objects.
This message occurs when some one tries to access
Hi all,
I'm running Lustre 1.6.7.2 on RHEL 4. I ran fsck and lfsck because of
several hard shutdowns due to power fails in the server room. Prior to
the repairs I was getting a few of the ASSERTION errors listed below on
some clients when certain files were accessed. This almost always locks
the
--
Outgoing messages are virus free checked by NOD32 system
The information contained in this e-mail message may be
privileged and confidential. The information is intended only
for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the
r
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 10:52 +0100, Stefano Elmopi wrote:
>
> If a server OSS breaks, I have the ability to mount the OST connected
> to another server that has a different IP ?
Yes. This is called "failover".
> I tried to reproduce the scenario but when I try to mount the lustre
> filesystem,
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 09:52 -0500, Dr. Hung-Sheng Tsao wrote:
> hi
Hi,
> I try to setup lustre in vbox env
> I can do rhel5.3 and lustre1.8.1.1
> what is better way to test ofed ?
Hrm. I'm not really sure what you are asking here given that VBox is a
virtual environment, which AFAIK does not vi
hi
I try to setup lustre in vbox env
I can do rhel5.3 and lustre1.8.1.1
what is better way to test ofed ?
I can do ge with iscsi storage but how do u test the IB/OFED stack?
TIA
<>___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://l
Hi,
I would like to know a thing about OSS server.
If a server OSS breaks, I have the ability to mount the OST connected
to another server that has a different IP ?
I tried to reproduce the scenario but when I try to mount the lustre
filesystem,
mount -t lustre /dev/sdc /LUSTRE_03, on the ne
12 matches
Mail list logo
