We have deployed 2.1.1 for several clusters, which each has hundreds of
nodes.
On Jun 10, 2012 6:05 AM, "Wojciech Turek" wrote:
> Thanks for a quick reply Andreas. I slightly misunderstood the lustre
> release process and thought that the next stable/production version is
> 2.2
>
> I am then inte
I guess the new Lustre release process is similar to how Ubuntu is released.
While we do our best to make each release as stable as possible, there is a
different expectation for long-term updates of the feature releases and the
maintenance releases.
Cheers, Andreas
On 2012-06-09, at 16:05, W
Thanks for a quick reply Andreas. I slightly misunderstood the lustre
release process and thought that the next stable/production version is
2.2
I am then interested in the experience of people running Lustre 2.1
Cheers
Wojciech
On 9 June 2012 21:52, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> I think you'll find
I think you'll find that there are not yet (m)any production deployments of
2.2. There are a number of production 2.1 deployments, and this is the current
maintenance stream from Whamcloud.
Cheers, Andreas
On 2012-06-09, at 14:33, Wojciech Turek wrote:
> I am building a 1.5PB storage system
I am building a 1.5PB storage system which will employ Lustre as the
main file system. The storage system will be extended at the later
stage beyond 2PB. I am considering using Lustre 2.2 for production
environment. This Lustre storage system will replace our older 300TB
system which is currently
