On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:12:40AM +, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
>
> I would prefer to see a fix immediately rather than someone filing a
> ticket to describe the fix, since the documentation fix should be
> self-describing. However, if there is a problem that isn't immediately
> resolved then a J
On 11/14/12 4:51 PM, "Christopher J. Walker" wrote:
>On 13/11/12 21:26, Ned Bass wrote:
>> - A review process for proposed changes that assures a high standard of
>>quality
>
>That's important. I've spotted cases where it's clear there's an issue,
>but am not sure what the correct answer is.
>
>A
On 13/11/12 21:26, Ned Bass wrote:
> - A review process for proposed changes that assures a high standard of
> quality
That's important. I've spotted cases where it's clear there's an issue,
but am not sure what the correct answer is.
A quick way of reporting issues in the manual would be usefu
From: Alex Kulyavtsev [a...@fnal.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 11:47 AM
To: Ned Bass
Cc: Nathan Rutman; ;
; lustre-de...@lists.lustre.org
Subject: Document Database Re: [Lustre-discuss] [wc-discuss] Seeking
contributors for Lustre User Manual
O
On Nov 13, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Ned Bass wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:48:35AM -0800, Nathan Rutman wrote:
>> Would it be easier to move the manual back to a Wiki? The low hassle
>> factor of wikis has always been a draw for contribution. The openSFS
>> site is up and running with MediaWiki
Friendly reminder. If your at SC and like to come for lunch and discussion on
important exa-scale I/O middleware work for next generation computing, just
drop me a note back that you will be attending. Seating is limited!
I'd like to invite you to the upcoming EIOW meeting on Thursday, Novembe
