Re: [lustre-discuss] Building lustre with zfs only

On 2015/12/15, 00:07, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Andrus, Brian Contractor" mailto:lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org> on behalf of bdand...@nps.edu> wrote: All, Not sure what the issue is, but I am trying to build the server packages for lustre using zfs only.

[lustre-discuss] Building lustre with zfs only

All, Not sure what the issue is, but I am trying to build the server packages for lustre using zfs only. I download the source and configure: ./configure --without-ldiskfs --enable-server This fails with: checking zfs devel headers... -I /usr/src/zfs-0.6.4.2/lib/libspl/include -I /usr/src/zf

Re: [lustre-discuss] lshowmount equivalent?

I've pushed patch http://review.whamcloud.com/17593 to restore this tool to the tree, but I'm not even sure if it builds yet. If someone with a vested interest in using this tool could take over that patch, then it can land in a finite time, as I've never used it myself and have lots of other thin

Re: [lustre-discuss] lshowmount equivalent?

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Scott Nolin wrote: > > On 12/14/2015 12:43 AM, Dilger, Andreas wrote: > ... > >> Is this a tool that you are using? IIRC, there wasn't a particular reason >> that it was removed, except that when we asked LLNL (the authors) they >> said they were no longer using

Re: [lustre-discuss] lshowmount equivalent?

On 12/14/2015 12:43 AM, Dilger, Andreas wrote: ... Is this a tool that you are using? IIRC, there wasn't a particular reason that it was removed, except that when we asked LLNL (the authors) they said they were no longer using it, and we couldn't find anyone that was using it so it was removed

Re: [lustre-discuss] lshowmount equivalent?

Hi, lshowmount is actually very useful for knowing which nodes are connecting to the Lustre. I use it in one of my scripts to ensure clients and OSSs already umounted. Andreas, hope that we can bring it back :). Regards, Cuong On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Dilger, Andreas wrote: > On 2015/