Re: [lustre-discuss] 2.9.51 missing health check?

Yep. That is it! I'll make accommodations. Thanks! Brian Andrus ITACS/Research Computing Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California voice: 831-656-6238 From: Ben Evans [mailto:bev...@cray.com] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 1:34 PM To: Andrus, Brian Contractor ; lustre-discuss@lists.lustre

Re: [lustre-discuss] 2.9.51 missing health check?

check to see if it moved to /sys/fs/lustre/health_check -Ben Evans From: lustre-discuss mailto:lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org>> on behalf of "Andrus, Brian Contractor" mailto:bdand...@nps.edu>> Date: Friday, January 20, 2017 at 4:05 PM To: "lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org

[lustre-discuss] 2.9.51 missing health check?

All, I recently built lustre from the 2.9.51_34_g835335a source and installed the resulting rpms on a box. Now my Nagios checks no longer work because /proc/fs/lustre/health_check does not exist. Is there a change in the build process that disables this? Any updated health check script or work

[lustre-discuss] Help troubleshooting a scalability issue

Hi I have a Lustre cluster composed by 1 MDS and 2 OSS servers. Clients are both physical machines (~ 25 boxes) and virtual machines (instantiated on a OpenStack cluster). These Virtual Machines are dynamically created and destroyed as needed (we have a machinery which provides such automatic