Re: [lustre-discuss] Replacing ldiskfs MDT with larger disk

2019-07-31 Thread Andreas Dilger
Just to clarify, when I referred to "file level backup/restore", I was referring to the MDT ldiskfs filesystem, not the whole Lustre filesystem (which would be _much_ too large for most sites. The various backup/restore methods are documented in the Lustre Operations Manual. Cheers, Andreas

Re: [lustre-discuss] Replacing ldiskfs MDT with larger disk

2019-07-31 Thread Jesse Stroik
This is excellent information, Andreas. Presently we do file level backups to the live file system and they take over 24 hours, so they're done continuously. For that timeframe to wrok, we'd need to be able to back up and recover the MDT to the new MDT with the file system online. Given

Re: [lustre-discuss] Replacing ldiskfs MDT with larger disk

2019-07-31 Thread Andreas Dilger
Normally the easy answer would be that a "dd" copy of the MDT device from your HDDs to a larger SSD LUN, then resize2fs to increase the filesystem size would also increase the number of inodes proportionately to the LUN size. However, since you are *not* using 1024-byte inode size, only

[lustre-discuss] Replacing ldiskfs MDT with larger disk

2019-07-31 Thread Jesse Stroik
Hi everyone, One of our lustre file systems outgrew its MDT and the original scope of its operation. This one is still running ldiskfs on the MDT. Here's our setup and restrictions: - centos 6 / lustre 2.8 - ldiskfs MDT - minimal downtime allowed, but the FS can be read-only for a while.