Con!
On Feb 20, 2013 7:11 AM, Kevin Canady kevin_can...@xyratex.com wrote:
Greetings Community!
Today we are very excited to announce that Xyratex has purchased
Lustre® and its assets from Oracle. We intend for Lustre to remain an
open-source, community-driven file system to be promoted by our
We have deployed 2.1.1 for several clusters, which each has hundreds of
nodes.
On Jun 10, 2012 6:05 AM, Wojciech Turek wj...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
Thanks for a quick reply Andreas. I slightly misunderstood the lustre
release process and thought that the next stable/production version is
2.2
I am
the logs and get back me
Thanks Regards
VIJESH
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Larry tsr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Your OST becomes read-only, that's the reason. Generally, it has
relationship with your hardware, for example, your storage is broken,
or your ldiskfs file system
Hi all,
I have a problem in setting lnet routing. The MDS and OSSes have IB
and GigE networks, 30.9.100.* for IB and 20.9.100.* for GigE. Most of
the clients have IB, too. But a few of them haven't. So I choose one
client as a lnet router. Below is the configurations:
On the MDS and OSSes,
IB:
claimed block map
Clone multiply-claimed blocks? yes
Illegal block number passed to ext2fs_test_block_bitmap #3449154175
for multiply claimed block map
I'd appreciate any suggestion anyone could give me！
2011/9/19, Larry tsr...@gmail.com:
you say the e2fsck enters a endless loop, maybe you
I believe there is no offcial version, just oracle version and
whamcloud version
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Mathew Eis m...@usgs.gov wrote:
Hi List,
We too, got lost looking for downloads in the Oracle etherland...
Are there any differences between the official version and the
ok, I'll report it soon, thanks
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Andreas Dilger adil...@whamcloud.com wrote:
On 2011-06-10, at 9:42 AM, Larry wrote:
I build lustre 1.8.6 rc1 on sles 10 sp2, kernel
2.6.16.60-0.69.1_x86_64-smp today, and get a lot of errors in
applying ldiskfs' kernel patches
this in future
1.8.x releases. SLES11 clients are already supported for the upcoming
2.1 community release. In the meantime, SLES users can still use the
equivalent Oracle 1.8.6 release (though someone from Oracle would need
to comment on the availability of this).
On 11-06-11 4:21 AM, Larry
Hi, everyone
I build lustre 1.8.6 rc1 on sles 10 sp2, kernel
2.6.16.60-0.69.1_x86_64-smp today, and get a lot of errors in
applying ldiskfs' kernel patches. Now I'm trying to update these
kernel patches one by one. So does this version support sles 10 sp2?
Thanks a lot
Best Regards,
Larry
try mounting the lustre filesystem with -o flock or -o localflock
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Christopher Walker
cwal...@fas.harvard.edu wrote:
Hello,
We have a user who is trying to post-process HDF files in R. Her script
goes through a number (~2500) of files in a directory, opening
you‘d better unmount the clients and ost/mdt first, then fsck them.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Christos Theodosiou
ctheo...@grid.auth.gr wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to perform a file-system check on a mounted lustre file-system.
The e2fsck fails with the following message:
e2fsck -n
Is it helpful updating the e2fsprogs to the newest version? I have
ever had a problem during e2fsck, after updating the e2fsprogs, it's
ok.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Andreas Dilger adil...@whamcloud.com wrote:
Having the actual error messages makes this kind of problem much easier to
If you *only* deactivate it on mds, then you can still see the ost on
client, just not to write on it anymore.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Samuel Aparicio sapari...@bccrc.ca wrote:
Follow up to this posting. I notice on the client that lctl device_list
reports the following:
0 UP mgc
Hi, all
Does lustre 1.8 stop update and maintenance? I have not seen any
updates for a long time. Only Whamcloud releases the Lustre 2.1. Does
it mean Oracle freeze the development of lustre?
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
activity
related to 1.8.x (as well as 2.1) in http://jira.whamcloud.com.
cheers,
robert read
Whamcloud, Inc
On Mar 1, 2011, at 4:48 , Larry wrote:
Hi, all
Does lustre 1.8 stop update and maintenance? I have not seen any
updates for a long time. Only Whamcloud releases the Lustre 2.1. Does
Hi Lucius,
lustre manual chapter 15 tells you how to do it
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Lucius lucius...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would like to extend a OSS, which is still in current use. I would like to
extend it with a server which has exactly the same HW configuration,
Dear all,
I have an odd problem today in my lustre 1.8.0. All of the OSSes and
MDS appear well. But one of client has problem. When creating a file
in OST5(one of my osts), and dd or echo something to this file, then
the process hangs, and never succeeds. for example,
client1:/home # lfs
Old version of e2fsprogs actually has bugs like this, the newer the
better, I think
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Craig Prescott presc...@hpc.ufl.edu wrote:
Andreas Dilger wrote:
Do you have enough RAM to run e2fsck on this node? Have you tried running
it under gdb to see if it can catch
Con!
Let's have a try.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Jim Garlick garl...@llnl.gov wrote:
Version 3 of the Lustre Monitoring Tool (LMT) is now available on gcode:
http://code.google.com/p/lmt/
This is a major release that hopefully will improve LMT usability.
It has been tested with Lustre
we use localflock in order to work with MPI-IO. flock may
consume more addtional resource than localflock.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Mark Dixon m.c.di...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get the MPI-IO/ROMIO shipped with OpenMPI and MVAPICH2
working with our Lustre 1.8
disruptive issue in early
1.8.x releases, but that was fixed in 1.8.1.1. Larry, 19528 was fixed in
1.8.1. You can check by checking the patch and noting that the first release
with a landed+ flag is 1.8.1. HTH
Larry wrote:
which critical bug does 1.8.0 have and fixed in 1.8.0.1? I know 1.8.0
has
which critical bug does 1.8.0 have and fixed in 1.8.0.1? I know 1.8.0
has bug #19528, but I don't know whether it fixed or not in 1.8.0.1
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Brian J. Murrell
brian.murr...@oracle.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 16:37 +0200, Alfonso Pardo wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
I
the latest lmt (lmt-2.6.4-2) is updated on Sep 17, 2010. Why say moribund?
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Andreas Davour dav...@pdc.kth.se wrote:
I ask because the lmt project seem to be quite moribund. Anyone else out there
doing something?
/andreas
--
Systems Engineer
PDC Center for
just git-pull from lustre repository and checkout the 1.8.4
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Wojciech Turek wj...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
Any idea when 1.8.4 will be released? Is there a source code available
somewhere so I can try to build it myself?
Many thanks
Wojciech
On 3 August 2010 17:55,
good job, I'll download and learn from them.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Adrian Ulrich adr...@blinkenlights.ch wrote:
First: Sorry for the shameless self advertising, but...
I uploaded two lustre-related modules to the CPAN:
#1: Lustre::Info provides easy access to information located
we have the same problem when running namd in lustre sometimes, the
console log suggest file lock expired, but I don't know why.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Wojciech Turek wj...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
Hi Richard,
If the cause of the I/O errors is Lustre there will be some message in the
logs.
/8b37bababf848123?lnk=gstq=I%2FO+error+on+clients#
Also there is a bug open which reports similar problem:
https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23190
On 23 July 2010 10:02, Larry tsr...@gmail.com wrote:
we have the same problem when running namd in lustre sometimes, the
console log suggest file
After my installation of OS, the first thing is to turn off the
SElinux, it seems no use, and often makes a lot of trouble...
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:24 PM, William Olson
lustre_ad...@reachone.com wrote:
When it comes to inexplicable permission problems, have you checked if
SELinux is
is
available.
Larry
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
get the error code. That patch does work
but has not been applied to 1.8.1.1 in the released rpms.
Still no option for permanent removal, but at least lfs df works again.
Larry
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http
, at the point
the first permanently inactive OST would be listed in lfs df the
output stops with the line error: llapi_obd_statfs failed: Bad address
(-14). This looks like a bug mentioned earlier in the 1.6.6 version of
Lustre. I am running 1.8.1.1.
Larry
I now see active is now set to 0.
However it still exists in proc and when running lfs df it shows there
as an inactive device.
I'm wanting it removed from existence. The OST no longer physically
exists yet I am haunted by its persistence on the MGS/MDT.
TIA,
Larry
Yes Brock -- as Mike has mentioned we also took this doc and provided
this for our TACC customer:
http://www.tacc.utexas.edu/resources/hpcsystems/
where we put 72 x4500s in place with this configuration with them.
In addition, Sun's recent Linux HPC Software
the aforementioned type of client.
Larry
Peter Bojanic wrote On 03/26/08 15:48,:
Hi Brennan,
Larry McIntosh of our Linux HPC team can advise you regarding our
Lustre/SAM integration options.
Cheers,
Bojanic
On 26-Mar-08, at 17:47, Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the process
the aforementioned type of client.
Larry
Brennan wrote On 03/26/08 14:47,:
What is the process for integrating a Lustre+SAMFS solution into an
existing customer environment. The plan is to have CRS build the
Lustre component, but Lustre and SAMFS will need to configured and
integrated
35 matches
Mail list logo
