Hey all,
I would like to be able to dump the usage tracking and quota
information for my lustre filesystems. I am currently running lustre 2.12
lfs quota -u $user $filesystem
works well enough for a single user. But I have been looking for a way
to get that information for all users of
!
Best,
---Steve
- Patrick
*From:* lustre-discuss on
behalf of Steve Barnet
*Sent:* Monday, August 5, 2019 9:59:10 AM
*To:* lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
*Subject:* [lustre-discuss] Group and Project quota enforcement
Hi all,
I am starting to work with project and group quotas since they
seem like they would be a good fit for one of our newer filesystems.
I think that I have the system configured correctly, and project
quotas enabled on all OSTs and the MDT (lustre version 2.12.2).
Basic tests appear to
Hi all,
Since early last summer, we have been running a 2.10.4 filesystem
pretty much without incident. Then about 2 weeks ago, it started
crashing for no immediately obvious reason. There are no indications
of hardware related problems in the logs, and the work loads have
not changed
Hi Andreas,
On 6/25/18 5:47 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Jun 25, 2018, at 20:39, Steve Barnet wrote:
Hi all,
I'm setting up a new lustre filesystem with 2.10.4. Things are
looking OK so far. However, I noticed that when I mount up
my MDT, df reports a smaller size than I expect
Hi all,
I'm setting up a new lustre filesystem with 2.10.4. Things are
looking OK so far. However, I noticed that when I mount up
my MDT, df reports a smaller size than I expect. The volume is
2.2TB, but the MDT reports 1.3:
icecube-lfs6-mds-1 ~ # df -h -t lustre
Filesystem
Hi all,
Thanks for the info. Very helpful!
Best,
---Steve
On 4/4/18 12:07 PM, Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr) wrote:
On Apr 3, 2018, at 1:14 PM, Steve Barnet <bar...@icecube.wisc.edu> wrote:
There appear to be a
couple ways that this could be done:
a) Add the service
Hi all,
We have a multipath OSS->OST hardware configuration which,
in principle, allows us to move OSTs between OSSes if/when
we need to do maintenance. In general, this has worked very
well for us.
However, today when I needed to do some maintenance, I
discovered that we have a set of OSTs
On 2/16/18 8:53 AM, Michael Watters wrote:
Can't be much worse than NFS.
Oh yes, it can! It will really depend upon how your
users work with it. If you regularly have many
people building their software chains, that can drag
your interactive response to its knees very quickly.
If your users
Hey all,
I am looking to upgrade from lustre 2.8 to 2.10. I see that
there are no pre-built RPMs for 2.10 on RHEL6.x families.
Did I miss them, or will I need to build from source (or
upgrade to Centos 7)?
Thanks much!
Best,
---Steve
___
out!
Best,
---Steve
On 5/4/17 10:51 AM, Colin Faber wrote:
Hi,
Yes MGS/MDT as well as OSTs, Remount MGS/MDT, then OSTs, then clients.
-cf
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr) <
rm...@utk.edu> wrote:
On May 4, 2017, at 11:03 AM, Steve Ba
System Administrator
National Institute for Computational Sciences
http://www.nics.tennessee.edu
On May 4, 2017, at 10:03 AM, Steve Barnet <bar...@icecube.wisc.edu> wrote:
Hi all,
This is Lustre 2.8.0 community edition, combined MGS/MDT.
I was adding storage to a filesystem and mist
Hi all,
This is Lustre 2.8.0 community edition, combined MGS/MDT.
I was adding storage to a filesystem and mistakenly duplicated an
index for one of the OSTs at creation time. Since these OSTs were
new and no data had been written, I made the mistake of reformatting
the affected OSTs
Hi all,
I have a filesystem that definitely has some consistency
errors (very long tail of woe). I'm planning to run the
online LFSCK to find and fix these errors. At the moment,
I'm just doing a dry run to get a feel for how much corruption
it's finding.
One thing that would be very
, so I'm hoping some expert eyes can shine a bit of
light on the situation.
Thanks for the tip!
Best,
---Steve
On Dec 11, 2016 3:37 PM, "Steve Barnet" <bar...@icecube.wisc.edu
<mailto:bar...@icecube.wisc.edu>> wrote:
Hi all,
Seeing something very strange. I re
Hi all,
Seeing something very strange. I recently added two OSSes
and 10 OSTs to one of our filesystems. Things look OK under
light loads, but when we load them up, we start seeing lots
of LNet errors.
OS: Scientific Linux 6.7
Lustre - Server: 2.8.0 Community version
Lustre - Client: 2.5.3
if there
is a strong need to upgrade all of the clients at
the same time as the servers, or if we can roll that out
whenever it's expedient.
Thanks much!
Best,
---Steve
--
Steve Barnet
UW-Madison IceCube
___
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss
folks who have more of
a clue than I do.
Thanks again!
Best,
---Steve
- Patrick
From: lustre-discuss [lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org] on behalf of
Steve Barnet [bar...@icecube.wisc.edu]
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 2:06 PM
To: lustre-disc
-431.23.3.el6_lustre.x86_64
OS is Scientific Linux 6.4:
Linux lfs-us-mds 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6_lustre.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Aug 28
20:20:13 PDT 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Any advice?
Thanks much, in advance!
Best,
---Steve
--
Steve Barnet
UW-Madison - IceCube
bar...@icecube.wisc.edu
lfs
19 matches
Mail list logo
