On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:12:40AM +, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
>
> I would prefer to see a fix immediately rather than someone filing a
> ticket to describe the fix, since the documentation fix should be
> self-describing. However, if there is a problem that isn't immediately
> resolved then a J
On 11/14/12 4:51 PM, "Christopher J. Walker" wrote:
>On 13/11/12 21:26, Ned Bass wrote:
>> - A review process for proposed changes that assures a high standard of
>>quality
>
>That's important. I've spotted cases where it's clear there's an issue,
>but am not sure what the correct answer is.
>
>A
On 13/11/12 21:26, Ned Bass wrote:
> - A review process for proposed changes that assures a high standard of
> quality
That's important. I've spotted cases where it's clear there's an issue,
but am not sure what the correct answer is.
A quick way of reporting issues in the manual would be usefu
On 2012-11-13, at 14:26, Ned Bass wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:48:35AM -0800, Nathan Rutman wrote:
>> Would it be easier to move the manual back to a Wiki? The low hassle
>> factor of wikis has always been a draw for contribution. The openSFS
>> site is up and running with MediaWiki now
+1
Steven
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Ned Bass wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:48:35AM -0800, Nathan Rutman wrote:
>> Would it be easier to move the manual back to a Wiki? The low hassle
>> factor of wikis has always been a draw for contribution. The openSFS
>> site is up and running
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:48:35AM -0800, Nathan Rutman wrote:
> Would it be easier to move the manual back to a Wiki? The low hassle
> factor of wikis has always been a draw for contribution. The openSFS
> site is up and running with MediaWiki now (wiki.opensfs.org).
Easier? Yes, probably. Bett
Would it be easier to move the manual back to a Wiki? The low hassle factor of
wikis has always been a draw for contribution. The openSFS site is up and
running with MediaWiki now (wiki.opensfs.org).
On Nov 9, 2012, at 4:09 PM, "Dilger, Andreas" wrote:
> In hopes of improving the quality, c
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 12:09:09AM +, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
> The manual source is hosted in a Git/Gerrit repository in Docbook XML
> format and can be downloaded at:
>
> git clone http://git.whamcloud.com/doc/manual lustre-manual
That doesn't work for me:
% git clone http://review.wh
