Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces

2013-06-27 Thread Indivar Nair
gt; *To:* Alfonso Pardo > *Cc:* Michael Shuey ; > lustre-discuss > *Subject:* Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces > > Then follow the instructions in my earlier mail. > No need to have bond0 and bond1. > You will achieve high-availability even with one bonded inte

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces

2013-06-26 Thread Alfonso Pardo
-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces Then follow the instructions in my earlier mail. No need to have bond0 and bond1. You will achieve high-availability even with one bonded interface. Cheers, Indivar Nair On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Alfonso Pardo wrote: Yes I have two

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces

2013-06-26 Thread Indivar Nair
her switch to > the second bond1 interface. > > > > *From:* Indivar Nair > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 26, 2013 8:05 PM > *To:* Alfonso Pardo > *Cc:* Michael Shuey ; > WC-Discuss; > lustre-discuss > *Subject:* Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces >

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces

2013-06-26 Thread Alfonso Pardo
Yes I have two swtiches, one to the bond0 interface and other switch to the second bond1 interface. From: Indivar Nair Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 8:05 PM To: Alfonso Pardo Cc: Michael Shuey ; WC-Discuss ; lustre-discuss Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces Hi

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces

2013-06-26 Thread Alfonso Pardo
the lustre downs for networks maintenance. From: Michael Shuey Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 2:17 PM To: Alfonso Pardo Cc: Brian O'Connor ; WC-Discuss ; lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces That will probably be slow - the machin

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces

2013-06-26 Thread Indivar Nair
To: Alfonso Pardo >> Cc: 'Michael Shuey' ; 'WC-Discuss' ; >> lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.**org >> Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces >> >> >> >> >> >> On 06/26/2013 04:16 PM, Alfonso Pardo wrote:

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces

2013-06-26 Thread Michael Shuey
huey' ; 'WC-Discuss' ; > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.**org > Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces > > > > > > On 06/26/2013 04:16 PM, Alfonso Pardo wrote: > >> But if I configure the OST assigning to the first interface o

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces

2013-06-26 Thread Alfonso Pardo
@lists.lustre.org Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces On 06/26/2013 04:16 PM, Alfonso Pardo wrote: > But if I configure the OST assigning to the first interface of the > OSS (bond0) and as failover OSS the second inteface of the OSS. If the > bond0 network do

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces

2013-06-26 Thread Brian O'Connor
:wc-discuss.migrat...@intel.com> ; > mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org > *Subject:* RE: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces > Unless something has changed in the new versions of lustre, I don't > think lustre can do failover between nids on the same machine. > >

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces

2013-06-25 Thread Alfonso Pardo
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 1:09 AM To: 'Alfonso Pardo' ; 'Michael Shuey' Cc: 'WC-Discuss' ; mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org Subject: RE: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces Unless something has changed in the new versions of lustre, I don'

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces

2013-06-25 Thread Brian O'Connor
tre-discuss@lists.lustre.org Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces thank Michael, This is my second step, I will change the lnet with “options lnet networks=tcp0(bond0,bond1)” because my machines has 4 nics. I have a bond0 and bond1 with LACP. I need to comunicate the clien

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces

2013-06-25 Thread White, Cliff
g>" mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org>> Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces thank Michael, This is my second step, I will change the lnet with “options lnet networks=tcp0(bond0,bond1)” because my machines has 4 nics. I have a bond0 and bond1 with LACP. I

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces

2013-06-25 Thread Alfonso Pardo
@lists.lustre.org ; WC-Discuss Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces Different interfaces need to be declared with different LNET networks - something like "networks=tcp0(eth0),tcp1(eth1)". Of course, that assumes your clients are configured to use a mix of tcp0 an

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces

2013-06-25 Thread Michael Shuey
Different interfaces need to be declared with different LNET networks - something like "networks=tcp0(eth0),tcp1(eth1)". Of course, that assumes your clients are configured to use a mix of tcp0 and tcp1 for connections (with each client only using one of the two). This is really only useful in co

[Lustre-discuss] Lustre over two TCP interfaces

2013-06-25 Thread Alfonso Pardo
hello friends, I need to comunicate my OSS by two ethernet TCP interfaces: eth0 and eth1. I have configured this feature in my modprobe.d with: “options lnet networks=tcp0(eth0,eth1)” And I can see two interfaces with: lctl --net tcp interface_list sa-d4-01.ceta-ciemat.es: (192.168.11.15/255.