On Sep 09, 2009 19:32 -0300, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> Forget the file.. sorry
>
> Lustre: 0:0:(watchdog.c:181:lcw_cb()) Watchdog
> triggered for pid 16372: it was inactive for 200.00s
>
> [stack trace]
Since lots of users are confused by this message, and think there
is a crash, I think we sh
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 21:38 -0300, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> It sms that using 64 threads for OST solved the problem.
Ahhh. As I suspected then. Good.
Thanx for updating the thread. The archives at least will like
that. :-)
b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sign
PM
To: Rafael David Tinoco
Cc: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] OSTs hanging while running IOR
Hello!
On Sep 9, 2009, at 1:31 PM, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> One of my OSSs crashes, sometimes one, sometimes another. With the
> following error:
That's
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] OSTs hanging while running IOR
>
> Im attaching the messages (only the error part) file so we don't have these
> mail formatting problems.
>
> --
>
> Can you provide a bit more of the log before th
ubject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] OSTs hanging while running IOR
Im attaching the messages (only the error part) file so we don't have these
mail formatting problems.
--
Can you provide a bit more of the log before the above so we can see what the
stack trace is in reference to? Also, try t
Im attaching the messages (only the error part) file so we don't have these
mail formatting problems.
--
Can you provide a bit more of the log before the above so we can see what the
stack trace is in reference to? Also, try to
eliminate the white-space between lines. Are you getting any
Hello!
On Sep 9, 2009, at 1:31 PM, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> One of my OSSs crashes, sometimes one, sometimes another. With the
> following error:
That's not a crash.
That's watchdog timeout indicative of lustre spending too much time
waiting on io.
As such you need to somehow decrease the l
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 14:31 -0300, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> Have anyone seen these kind of errors while running IOR or some other
> benchmarks:
On a note of e-mail formatting, so much vertical whitespace is not
really needed and makes reading a bit more difficult.
Also, personally, I don't wr
Have anyone seen these kind of errors while running IOR or some other
benchmarks:
Im running lustre 1.8.1 on CentOS 5.3.
I have the following configuration:
4 JBDOs J4400 connected to 4 OSSs.
Each OSS has 3 OSTs (raid5 - 8 disks) connected using multipathd, mdadm on
/dev/dm* and usi