I'd be very interested to know what hard evidence you have for the suggestion
that these are two different people.
MH
Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geminiani guitar pieces display pretty much the same set of sensibilities as
his violin and cello sonatas.
The gallichon
see also:
Jiri Cepelaks website:
Taking care of your lute:
http://lute.cepelak.cz/care.pdf
Henner
Martin Shepherd [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Yes, David Van Edwards' booklet, published by the Lute Society, is
excellent. Also, have a look at:
http://lute.cepelak.cz/care.pdf
Best to
Yes, David Van Edwards' booklet, published by the Lute Society, is
excellent. Also, have a look at:
http://lute.cepelak.cz/care.pdf
Best to All,
Martin
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
Well, I use firefox too, but can't read this book either. Are you sure it's
free?
JL
-Original Message-
From: David Tayler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 6:08 AM
To: lute-cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Signor Tiorba
Hmmm
I just use firefox to read
1. There is no hard evidence otherwise.
2. Real Brescianello's music is lofty and finely crafted, neither of which
is observed in the gallichon pieces in question. The latter also display
none of the real Brescianello experience as a polyphonist and an operatic
composer.
3. The real B. style
Dear Leonard,
When I edited that piece I included the repeat signs almost exactly
as they are found in the manuscript. The scribe uses an 'S' shaped sign
with a dot either side of the top. The original is of course in Italian
tablature, and the signs are at the bottom of the stave. Fronimo
I clicked on the link, the article was there.
ed
At 01:09 PM 2/10/2008 +0900, Ed Durbrow wrote:
Where do you find the place to read? I just get a link about the book.
On Feb 9, 2008, at 10:20 PM, Edward Martin wrote:
That was a good read, Signor Musicologisto!
To get on or off this list
It's definetely a very interesting question. Indeed most lute players DO
know how to take care of their lute(s), but as far as I can remember little
guides related to how tochange frets, etc are around. Look on lutemakers
web sites (many around)!
A good one is available
Yes, I have no problem with it. In David Tayler's original message, the
URL was on 2 lines. Did you include the complete URL?
ed
At 12:08 PM 2/10/2008 +0100, =?iso-8859-2?Q?Jaros=B3aw_Lipski?= wrote:
Well, I use firefox too, but can't read this book either. Are you sure it's
free?
JL
Reading this, I couldn't help but to wonder whose lutes this guitar
repairman is seeing in his shops. No mention was made of that. We are
pretty-well aware that some lutes (the term Pakistani has been bandied
about) are of inferior or bizarre manufacture. If these are the lutes
that guitar-players
I'm having the same problem - I get the Google page inviting me to search,
giving me a few details about how and where to buy or borrow the book, and a
couple of publication details, but no text whatsoever - I do, however get a
world map telling me about places mentioned in it. I tried adding
I've posted an encyclopedia entry from 1819 about The Guitar, or
Cittern. Please have a look - there are some points of interest. The
lute and especially the theorbo are mentioned in the same entry.
http://www.cetrapublishing.com/citterncafe/
To get on or off this list see list
Hmmm. I saw it fine too. And Ed M. and, of course, David. --all here in
the US. Might I hazard the guess that it's only regionally available?
I think http://tinyurl.com/ has been mentioned before. Just paste the
monster url into the tiny url slot and voila da gamba: a portable
descant from
David:
Maybe this guy's guitar-playing friends are all as uninformed about lutes
as he is, and the only lute any of them has ever purchased is one of the
Pakistani approximations available in quantity on E-Bay. Apparently
those are indeed unplayable as received (I have never seen one) and might
I have seen a few of them, and yes, they are unplayable as received.
ed
At 11:10 AM 2/10/2008 -0600, Daniel F Heiman wrote:
David:
Maybe this guy's guitar-playing friends are all as uninformed about lutes
as he is, and the only lute any of them has ever purchased is one of the
Pakistani
Also, the luthiers I know will admit that in the seventies, when they were
still essentially reinventing the craft, there were a number of lutes built
that went a little too far in the direction of lightweight construction, and
did often fail after a few years. I remember Paul O'Dette apologizing
Here's the tiny
http://tinyurl.com/3xcgqz
I'm thinking this is a java issue if you can't view the books.
If I have time I'll download the pdf
dt (dottore tiorba)
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
David Van Edwards wrote a little booklet on caring for your lute available
from the (English) Lute Society as one of their publications - I think it is
still in print!
Nick Gravestock
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
It used to be said that all flat sound-boarded instruments, including
guitars, had a fairly short life span of about twenty years, before
they need to have their sound-boards replaced.
Some lutists seem to sell their lutes on, after about that time
period. However, when Michael Lowe spoke
Denys--
A very humble opinion here (I can't really play the piece fluently,
but the repeat signs piqued my interest to try it): The repeat at the start
of 58 omits a cadence which is found (simplified) in bar 48. It seems that
the repeated section should include either 48 through and
Hi Roman,
you're right.
Piero Prosser pointed out that the 18 gallichone sonatas could have been
written by Johann Paul Shiffelholtz.
DR
- Original Message -
From: Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lutelist lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 1:25 PM
Subject:
21 matches
Mail list logo
