[LUTE] Re: 6th course on 'baroque' lute [was Gut strings] Foscarini corrente

2011-11-22 Thread Stuart Walsh
On 21/11/2011 14:09, Monica Hall wrote: I asked because I have been comparing Foscarini's arrangements of lute works by Gaultier with the originals. He sticks very close to the original (making allowances for the absence of a 6th course and the fact that the 3rd course on the lute is a

[LUTE] Re: 6th course on 'baroque' lute [was Gut strings] Foscarini corrente

2011-11-22 Thread Monica Hall
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: 6th course on 'baroque' lute [was Gut strings] Foscarini corrente On 21/11/2011 14:09, Monica Hall wrote: I asked because I have been comparing Foscarini's arrangements of lute works by Gaultier with the originals. He sticks very close to the original (making

[LUTE] Re: 6th course on 'baroque' lute [was Gut strings]

2011-11-21 Thread Martyn Hodgson
Dear Monica, Von Radolt's Instructions clearly tell us that he had an octave on the 6th course. Similarly in some of Mouton's tablature (amongst others) the low octave is required to be played and then later the high octave of the same course. See the FoMRHI paper jointly written

[LUTE] Re: 6th course on 'baroque' lute [was Gut strings]

2011-11-21 Thread Monica Hall
Dear Martin Von Radolt's Instructions clearly tell us that he had an octave on the 6th course. Similarly in some of Mouton's tablature (amongst others) the low octave is required to be played and then later the high octave of the same course. See the FoMRHI paper jointly written by

[LUTE] Re: 6th course on 'baroque' lute [was Gut strings]

2011-11-21 Thread Monica Hall
On 21/11/2011 14:09, Monica Hall wrote: I asked because I have been comparing Foscarini's arrangements of lute works by Gaultier with the originals. He sticks very close to the original (making allowances for the absence of a 6th course and the fact that the 3rd course on the lute is a