[LUTE] Re: imperfectly tune

2012-02-14 Thread Martin Shepherd
@cs.dartmouth.edu Sent: Tue, February 7, 2012 1:23:25 AM Subject: [LUTE] Re: imperfectly tune --- On Tue, 2/7/12, hera caius[1]caiush2...@yahoo.com wrote: From: hera caius[2]caiush2...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [LUTE] imperfectly tune To: Nicolae Szekely[3]mikiszek...@yahoo.com

[LUTE] Re: imperfectly tune

2012-02-13 Thread David Tayler
__ From: hera caius caiush2...@yahoo.com To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Sent: Tue, February 7, 2012 1:23:25 AM Subject: [LUTE] Re: imperfectly tune --- On Tue, 2/7/12, hera caius [1]caiush2...@yahoo.com wrote: From: hera

[LUTE] Re: imperfectly tune

2012-02-07 Thread hera caius
--- On Tue, 2/7/12, hera caius caiush2...@yahoo.com wrote: From: hera caius caiush2...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [LUTE] imperfectly tune To: Nicolae Szekely mikiszek...@yahoo.com Date: Tuesday, February 7, 2012, 11:22 AM There is no perfect tuning. There are several ways

[LUTE] Re: imperfectly tune

2012-02-06 Thread David van Ooijen
With a tuner, correct the frets string by string. Mark the (in tune) fret spacing of each string on a piece of paper. Then compare the fret spacings of all strings and make a compromise that will make the first five frets more or less in tune for all strings. David On 6 February 2012 11:43,