Re: Astrologos

2004-05-04 Thread Roman Turovsky
> This topic has been covered previously on the list (exhaustively!!). I > would suggest Jon look up the archives. Before this starts another mamoth > thread (We know what happened last time!) > > with best intentions > > Anthony MO's conspicuous absence causes compromised vigilance. RT _

Re: Astrologos

2004-05-04 Thread Anthony Hart
This topic has been covered previously on the list (exhaustively!!). I would suggest Jon look up the archives. Before this starts another mamoth thread (We know what happened last time!) with best intentions Anthony > Eugene, > > I think we actually agree, I may have mis-stated my comment. In t

Re: Astrologos

2004-05-04 Thread Jon Murphy
Addendum, Eugene, and Daniel, I've just seen Daniel's original message in this thread. It changes nothing in my answer to Eugene. Astrologos says they are "copyright cleared" or "public domain". Translated this means that they have bought copys of out of print boo

Re: Astrologos

2004-05-03 Thread Jon Murphy
Eugene, I think we actually agree, I may have mis-stated my comment. In this case the oringinal publisher (1901) is long out of business, the publisher of the reprint (1971) has been bought out - and the new owner of the copyright has no interest in reprinting (I contacted them). The publisher of

Re: Astrologos

2004-05-03 Thread Eugene Braig
At 05:28 AM 05/02/2004 -0400, Jon Murphy wrote: >OK, find a copy and photo it, provided that you have no other source but one >that wants to monopolize it. Anyone who spends years, or effort, to find a >lost piece deserves the fruit of his labors. But just having a copy of >something doesn't make t

Re: Astrologos

2004-05-02 Thread Jon Murphy
Daniel, I'll risk the anger of those who make facsimiles, and the libraries with the originals, and all the copyright advocates. I wanted a copy of an out of print 1901 book on harps, and tried the original publisher, then the new publisher who made a facsimile in 1970, then the publisher who had

Re: Astrologos

2004-04-30 Thread Brian and Ann Dunbar
James A Stimson wrote: > > Dear Peter and All: > Hey, let's cut to the chase: How much did it cost? A quick check on the URL, as included on your email post, lists the price as $157.20. > The URL for the book on UMI's site is > http://wwwlib.umi.com/bod/fullcite?id=153122 .

RE: Astrologos

2004-04-30 Thread James A Stimson
cc: "'LUTE-LIST'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Astrologos 04/30/2004 08:41

RE: Astrologos

2004-04-30 Thread Peter Nicklin
//wwwlib.umi.com/bod/fullcite?id=153122 . UMI also seems a bit cheaper than Astrologos. Regards Peter -Original Message- From: Daniel Shoskes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 2:27 PM To: LUTE-LIST Subject: Astrologos I have been interested in getting a copy of

Re: Astrologos

2004-04-30 Thread Rainer aus dem Spring
Daniel Shoskes wrote: > I have been interested in getting a copy of Ness' Lute Music of Milano. > The only bookseller that seems to have it is Astrogos, which makes > (expensive) made to order reproductions (http://www.astrologos.org/). > They also offer a version of the Jane Pickering lute book.

Astrologos

2004-04-30 Thread Daniel Shoskes
I have been interested in getting a copy of Ness' Lute Music of Milano. The only bookseller that seems to have it is Astrogos, which makes (expensive) made to order reproductions (http://www.astrologos.org/). They also offer a version of the Jane Pickering lute book. Anyone deal with this company