As for being able to return to the original key, maybe
we should conceptualize harmonic cycles as being
spirals rather than circles. (spiral of fifths?)
Ever flatter, eh? Many singers already do this.
Movable frets is an interesting concept.
Yes very interesting. I can't imagine cheap, though.
At 9:54 AM +0100 2/27/05, Stephan Olbertz wrote:
have a look at
http://www.hermode.de/
This is a most interesting site and has very
understandable presentations. It's almost enough
to make me want to buy Logic Audio just so I can
use the system. It presents a solution along the
lines of what
At 08:27 AM 2/27/2005, Howard Posner wrote:
This actually happens rather a lot in barbershop quartet singing.
Barbershoppers adjust intervals on the fly to get chords to ring. Since
they're constantly flattening thirds, this tends to make the overall pitch
drift downwards. They don't care.
--- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ---
Von: Stephan Olbertz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Dr. Marion Ceruti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: The 'perfect' instrument?
Datum: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:28:45 +0100
Dear Marion,
have a look at
http://www.hermode.de/
Regards,
Stephan
Am Sat, 26 Feb 2005 06
- Original Message -
From: Stephan Olbertz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: The 'perfect' instrument?
--- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ---
Von: Stephan Olbertz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Dr. Marion Ceruti [EMAIL PROTECTED
Ed Durbrow wrote:
I have not thought this through, but wouldn't you run into problems
if you modulate and then modulate back to the original key by a
different route?
This actually happens rather a lot in barbershop quartet singing.
Barbershoppers adjust intervals on the fly to get chords to
I have not thought this through, but wouldn't you run into problems
if you modulate and then modulate back to the original key by a
different route?
This actually happens rather a lot in barbershop quartet singing.
Barbershoppers adjust intervals on the fly to get chords to ring. Since
],
lute list lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: Re: The 'perfect' instrument?
Hello everyone,
With today's technology, it is theoretically possible to construct a conputer-
generated instrument, such as a keyboard, that would always be in tune
in any key because the computer could be programmed
Dear Stephan,
Thank you - what a great web site! Very interesting
and educational.
Best regards,
Marion
-Original Message-
From: Stephan Olbertz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Feb 27, 2005 12:54 AM
To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: Re: The 'perfect' instrument
Thanks, Tony. I'll check out the site.
Cheers,
Marion
-Original Message-
From: Tony Chalkley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Feb 27, 2005 1:43 AM
To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: Re: The 'perfect' instrument?
Just before I got to Stephan's message, I was thinking of the possibilities
offered
It all depends on how you define a problem. It is not a problem for them.
The main thing is that they should sound good together.
-Original Message-
From: Howard Posner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Feb 27, 2005 5:27 AM
To: lute list lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: Re: The 'perfect' instrument
-Original Message-
From: Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Feb 27, 2005 5:54 AM
To: Howard Posner [EMAIL PROTECTED], lute list lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: Re: The 'perfect' instrument?
I have not thought this through, but wouldn't you run into problems
if you modulate
Hello everyone,
With today's technology, it is theoretically possible to construct a conputer-
generated instrument, such as a keyboard, that would always be in tune
in any key because the computer could be programmed to place the
Pythagorean comma always on the opposite side of the circle of
Hello everyone,
With today's technology, it is theoretically possible to construct a conputer-
generated instrument, such as a keyboard, that would always be in tune
in any key because the computer could be programmed to place the
Pythagorean comma always on the opposite side of the circle of
14 matches
Mail list logo
