and piano-forte are different, but the keyboard is very simila$4
r
- Original Message -
From: Timothy Kuntz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Rastall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: looking for a lutar - forwarded
Hi,
Jon said
And SimonShuster tap dancing Scarborough Book Fair
RT
An arrow in my heart, Roman, the old Ionic mode version was a fine song, the
new Doric version by Simon and Garfunkle is a pretty song, but misses the
meaning of the lyric. Were I a publisher I'd promote my version using the
full text with
dominant musical instrument of the period, out side the human voice.
Vance Wood.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: looking for a lutar - forwarded
Jon wrote:
I seem to have missed something, my
Hi,
Jon said:
I totally disagree with your premise. The form of the instrument may
drive
the way it is played, but the music drives the player.
And David Rastall replied:
I'm sorry to sound so obtuse, Jon, but I'm not aware of operating on
any one particular premise.
I've noticed
No you fool, he is obviously referring to the famous concert of Chet
Perkins, bastard child of Chet Atkins and Carl Perkins. In addition to Mark
Knopf on guitar, the sidemen included W.W. Norton on bass, Random House on
drums and Ed. Orpheé on harp.
Bluegrass I know well, and have
a TV
On Saturday, October 11, 2003, at 11:58 AM, Stuart LeBlanc wrote:
No you fool, he is obviously referring to the famous concert of Chet
Perkins, bastard child of Chet Atkins and Carl Perkins.
Gosh how stupid of me, I should have realized that.
In addition to Mark
Knopf on guitar, the
Rastall [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jon Murphy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Matanya Ophee [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 11:58 AM
Subject: RE: looking for a lutar - forwarded
No you fool, he is obviously referring to the famous concert of Chet
Perkins, bastard child
An Elizabethan lutarist?
Eugene wrote:
I also understand that the members of a modern Elizabethan reenactment
group might not be inspired to take up a more proper lute out of sole
interest in the lute, which may very well be misguided motivation (not to
mention an expensive investment of both
Gernot wrote:
The term lutar is - at least as far as I know - used for a
LUte-guiTAR, i.e. a six-course singlestrung lute, just like the
Wandervogellaute. This may be what Rachel's looking for. These things
sell at ebay quite cheaply. Search for lute.
Yes, that's what she's looking for. I'm
At 01:15 PM 10/7/2003 -0400, David Rastall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To my mind it's just a guitar with a lute-like body and pegboard. So it
was in vogue for a while in 19th-century Germany, it probably doesn't hold
much interest for those who are interested in the renaissance or Baroque
lute.
Well, my apologies to all. My statement largely was meant to be tongue in
cheek, and I intended no slight to the early Jugendbewegung movement or
Wandervögel groups. After all, they constituted the earliest seed of what
has flowered into one of the most active camps of modern art music for
. A modern
guitar
in a lute-like shape may be just the tool for this job.
which would be a liuto forte
but these are rather expensive (I think the cheapest will cost around
6000 $)
(well-done instruments without repertoire but of high quality of
craftsmanship - what a loss of material and time
Matanya Ophee wrote:
..past century, the Vogelwand movement. There were literally hundreds of...
it was Wandervogel (wandering birds), actually... ;-)
Vogelwand = bird's wall
Manolo Laguillo
Barcelona
--
On Tuesday, October 7, 2003, at 06:43 PM, Eugene Braig wrote:
...There _were_ reams of
shoddily constructed guitar lutes built to target a fickle crowd of
amateurs; such is the case with any popular instrument (e.g., consider
the
modern guitar or the mandolin in the early 1900s).
It's
14 matches
Mail list logo
