Hi Simon,
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:17:15PM +0200, goldsi...@gmx.de wrote:
> Sylvain Rochet wrote:
> >Humm, I would have thought that a revision release didn't change the API
> >at all,
>
> Thinking about it again, I guess it was an ABI change, not an API change.
> For the target of lwIP (at
Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Humm, I would have thought that a revision release didn't change the API
at all,
Thinking about it again, I guess it was an ABI change, not an API change.
For the target of lwIP (at that time?) keeping the API stable was enough.
And remember the API does *not* include
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 08:17:42PM +0200, goldsi...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> Right. We didn't have binary compatiblity in mind, so after removing some
> flags, some other flags' values have changed. That might still work if you
> fix them up after netif_add() (which calls the netif's init
Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Humm, the raw API didn't change much, so it should be fine.
I guess so, too. In any way, if you have the sources, you could even fix
it if it needs fixing. I hope it doesn't (unless you add IPv6, in that
case, it might).
However, the netif API changed… especially if
Hi there,
here I am with this chinese module having linkable libraries for the
link layer driver (no source) and an (I think) netconn-like layer over
RAW API (yes source), developed for lwIP 1.4.0RC2. Introducing ESP8266.
Let's say I want to move to 1.4.1 or even 2.0.0
For 2.0.0, I think that
Hi all,
after porting to v2.0.0 and reducing the cunks to 16kB everything works
fine. Seems like the limited S-RAM and Frequency of the Mikrocontroller
couldn't handle chunks this large.
Thanks for all your help.
Regards,
Norbert
Am 07.08.2016 um 11:57 schrieb Norbert Kleber:
Hi
I've just read the brand new shiny 2.0.0 docs, and tcp_accepted() has
been put to sleep, six feet under, pushing up the daisies.
Mi example TCP server code does this:
static err_t myconnected(void *arg, struct tcp_pcb* pcb, err_t err)
{
if(err == ERR_OK){
Great!
The text in
http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_0/raw_api.html
still references tcp_accepted(), which has been removed
___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
On 8/6/2016 7:03 AM, Norbert Kleber wrote:
...As long the file to transfer is smaller than this magical 29200
Bytes every thing works fine, but if it exceeds that limit the TCP
connection freezes after transmitting the 29200Bytes
i would be grateful for any hint.
For what it's worth,
Please search the list,
read the wiki,
http://lwip.wikia.com/wiki/Raw/TCP
and or go to this recent msg
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lwip-users/2016-08/msg00063.html
there you'll see a working way to interact with TCP.
You can also check the code in the web server and the
I don't follow your logic, and don't have the time to sort it out. Sorry.
You have a server.
A server receives a request on the rx path, on an rx frame. I wouldn't
process that on a poll callback, which is called at fixed intervals.
Then the server tries to send something back, and it may have
> 1. We got the web server original code from STM32 provided example
> "LwIP_HTTP_Server_Raw" , but also mixed with 1.4.1 contrib, which are
> quite the same.
Then go to ST, "mixed" and "quite the same" is not the thoroughly tested
server in the contrib tree. It is your code, your
Hello all,
the lwIP documentation at
http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_0/index.html
was greatly improved. Have a look, and please tell me if you have any
comments, corrections or improvements!
Dirk
___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
