[lwip-users] Exporting the real BSD socket API function names?

2012-02-29 Thread Mason
Hello, Is it possible to configure lwip in such a way that the static library I build exports the /real/ BSD socket API function names? I.e. export foo instead of lwip_foo (for socket, connect, bind, etc) I'm trying to port libcurl on top of lwip, and it expects an actual BSD socket implementatio

Re: [lwip-users] Exporting the real BSD socket API function names?

2012-02-29 Thread Simon Goldschmidt
Mason wrote: > Is it possible to configure lwip in such a way that the static > library I build exports the /real/ BSD socket API function names? > I.e. export foo instead of lwip_foo (for socket, connect, bind, etc) I don't think it's currently possible without modifying the sources. I'd sugges

Re: [lwip-users] Exporting the real BSD socket API function names?

2012-02-29 Thread Mason
Simon Goldschmidt wrote: > Mason wrote: > >> Is it possible to configure lwip in such a way that the static >> library I build exports the /real/ BSD socket API function names? >> I.e. export foo instead of lwip_foo (for socket, connect, bind, etc) > > I don't think it's currently possible withou

Re: [lwip-users] Exporting the real BSD socket API function names?

2012-02-29 Thread Simon Goldschmidt
Mason wrote: > However, this was a red herring, and I'm still stuck building > libcurl. I think the main problem is that the lwip header > naming might not be 100% POSIX compliant, and libcurl can't > find a lot of network related declarations. > > I think I saw some discussion or bug reports con

Re: [lwip-users] Exporting the real BSD socket API function names?

2012-03-08 Thread Mason
Simon Goldschmidt wrote: > Mason wrote: > >> However, this was a red herring, and I'm still stuck building >> libcurl. I think the main problem is that the lwip header >> naming might not be 100% POSIX compliant, and libcurl can't >> find a lot of network related declarations. >> >> I think I saw