Raphael Zulliger wrote:
I'd like to stress again that both, the mentioned Ubuntu and a Windows
10 system respect different MTUs for IPv4 and IPv6
That was clear from the first mail. Maybe it got clear from my mail,
that I wanted to know what are the downsides of our behaviour.
I failed to re
Thanks for your replies.
I'd like to stress again that both, the mentioned Ubuntu and a Windows
10 system respect different MTUs for IPv4 and IPv6 in my case, as shown
by Wireshark. I.e. Sending UDP frames, it behaves like this:
- IPv4: Frames are being fragmented starting from 1473 Bytes (whi
Sent from my iPad
> On Sep 4, 2017, at 13:48, "goldsi...@gmx.de" wrote:
>
> Raphael Zulliger wrote:
>> What do you think? Have I found a bug and shall I open a bug report or
>> am I wrong?
>
> I'm not really sure. After all, the MTU is what a network can send. Having a
> different MTU for IP
Raphael Zulliger wrote:
What do you think? Have I found a bug and shall I open a bug report or
am I wrong?
I'm not really sure. After all, the MTU is what a network can send.
Having a different MTU for IPv4 and IPv6 doesn't make much sense to me?
Simon
__
Hi
The following findings and statements are mostly based on observation
and I'm not an IP guru, so take the following with a grain of salt.
Having, among others, IPv6 and LWIP_ND6_ALLOW_RA_UPDATES enabled, an
"IPv6 router advertisement" that specifies an MTU causes LWIP to update
its intern