Raphael Zulliger wrote:
I'd like to stress again that both, the mentioned Ubuntu and a Windows
10 system respect different MTUs for IPv4 and IPv6
That was clear from the first mail. Maybe it got clear from my mail,
that I wanted to know what are the downsides of our behaviour.
I failed to
Thanks for your replies.
I'd like to stress again that both, the mentioned Ubuntu and a Windows
10 system respect different MTUs for IPv4 and IPv6 in my case, as shown
by Wireshark. I.e. Sending UDP frames, it behaves like this:
- IPv4: Frames are being fragmented starting from 1473 Bytes
Sent from my iPad
> On Sep 4, 2017, at 13:48, "goldsi...@gmx.de" wrote:
>
> Raphael Zulliger wrote:
>> What do you think? Have I found a bug and shall I open a bug report or
>> am I wrong?
>
> I'm not really sure. After all, the MTU is what a network can send. Having a
>
Raphael Zulliger wrote:
What do you think? Have I found a bug and shall I open a bug report or
am I wrong?
I'm not really sure. After all, the MTU is what a network can send.
Having a different MTU for IPv4 and IPv6 doesn't make much sense to me?
Simon
Hi
The following findings and statements are mostly based on observation
and I'm not an IP guru, so take the following with a grain of salt.
Having, among others, IPv6 and LWIP_ND6_ALLOW_RA_UPDATES enabled, an
"IPv6 router advertisement" that specifies an MTU causes LWIP to update
its