On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:44 AM Saint Michael wrote:
> The Achilles' heel is the type of CPU. I had to recompile my app once I
> moved it to an older CPU. Nothing is portable 100%.
> I guess nothing allows you to get rid of the developer at the end of the
> day.
>
If you compile it yourself,
The Achilles' heel is the type of CPU. I had to recompile my app once I
moved it to an older CPU. Nothing is portable 100%.
I guess nothing allows you to get rid of the developer at the end of the
day.
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 9:25 PM Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 8:18 PM
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 8:18 PM Saint Michael wrote:
> Thanks for the F grade.
> In telecommunications, there is a special kind of software apps called
> switches, which actually involve dozens of apps, scripts, etc. That kind of
> complexity is only packageable in a container.
>
It's a matter
On Tue, 2019-05-28 21:50 +0200, Xavier Gendre wrote as excerpted:
> Hello Lukas,
>
> unprivileged buster containers on a buster host run like a charm. Your
> config includes a lot of stuff that are not suited for an unprivileged
> container (apparmor, ...). First, you should try with a simpler
Hello Lukas,
unprivileged buster containers on a buster host run like a charm. Your
config includes a lot of stuff that are not suited for an unprivileged
container (apparmor, ...). First, you should try with a simpler
configuration file as the following one.
---%<--%<--%<---
All the harsh criticism aside, the driving concern in business is getting
it done. Many successful products have been kludges, which fulfilled a
need.
Jake
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 7:00 AM Scott Lopez wrote:
> So? Doesn't matter if you're programming a switch or a heart monitor.
> Learn how to
So? Doesn't matter if you're programming a switch or a heart monitor. Learn
how to properly package your application. Apparently it was done before LXC
came along, so it should still be possible today. What you want is an easy
way out of simply cloning an existing installation which is never a
Dear all,
first, thanks for the friendly and supportive help you all provide in issue
trackers, on mailing lists, etc. – it is very helpful to find all this online.
However, I struggle to run unprivileged (Debian Buster) containers (on a
Debian Buster host). LXC does not seem to mount the cgroup
Thanks for the F grade.
In telecommunications, there is a special kind of software apps called
switches, which actually involve dozens of apps, scripts, etc. That kind of
complexity is only packageable in a container.
Other industries can get away with far simpler infrastructures. A switch is
Wow, what a disaster of a thread.
Wouldn't it be easier to learn how to properly package and distribute your
application suite using a tool such as Ansible than to learn how to break
LXC, deal with the quirks and figure out how to shoehorn it into doing what
it wasn't designed to do?
You get a
I actually think that lxc.net.0.type = none is the solution to all my
problems. All I need to access my host is to use a different SSH port.
I didn't know this one. Thanks to all of you.
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 1:47 AM Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 12:39 PM Saint Michael
11 matches
Mail list logo
