Hi,
I am a newbie to using containers, and I am trying to run a DPDK enabled app
inside a system container (which I created using lxc-create). While,
lxc-execute works to run the dpdk app, the system container does not, giving me
the following error:
EAL: Cannot open /dev/uio0: No such file or
like:
lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 249:0 rwm
And as you suggested:
lxc.mount.entry = /dev/uio0 dev/uio0 none bind,create=file
?
Anjali
On 7/7/14 8:22 AM, "Stéphane Graber" wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 02:59:44PM +0000, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I
Also that worked. Thanks..
On 7/7/14 11:20 AM, "Anjali Kulkarni" wrote:
>Thanks Stephane for your response!
>Just to be clear, if I use option 3, I use the host's device info, that is
>the device has foll. Major/minor nos 249, 0 as obtained below on host:
>
>ls -
Hi,
I am interested in running 2 processes in 2 containers, each creating a
file in /var/locks.
But I don't see a /var/locks in the container rootfs:
ls /var/lib/lxc/test/rootfs/var/locks
ls: cannot access /var/lib/lxc/test/rootfs/var/locks: No such file or
directory
Is there a way this can be d
Hi,
I know it is possible to pin an individual container to a CPU core, but is
it possible to pin different threads inside a container to different cores?
Thanks
Anjali
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxco
Hi,
We are trying to have a VM and a container ping each other via a private
bridge (not going through host) via macvlan interface. A bridge, lxcbr1 is
already created and contains a link from VM, and we want to add container
to it as well.
To do that, on adding the foll. config to a container,
n an real
>physical nic.
>
>Quoting Anjali Kulkarni (anj...@juniper.net):
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are trying to have a VM and a container ping each other via a private
>> bridge (not going through host) via macvlan interface. A bridge, lxcbr1
>>is
>> already
ner,
which does not go through the host.
Anjali
On 8/13/14 10:36 AM, "CDR" wrote:
>Do a real bridge on the host and use it on both the VM and the
>container. I do it all the time.
>
>On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Anjali Kulkarni
>wrote:
>> Thanks - is there any
to
>this vlan devices. This will allow you to host isolated sets of
>containers in different VLAN's, e.g. for staging purposes.
>
>Guido
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: lxc-users [mailto:lxc-users-boun...@lists.linuxcontainers.org] On
>>Behalf Of Anjali Ku
Hi,
Are you trying to run DPDK in a container? You need to tweak a few things. I
will try to write up all the changes needed to get DPDK to work inside
containers, and send you shortly. In the meantime, it would help if you
specified what error you get.
Anjali
From: Swetha Gurudu mailto:sweth
You can export the uio device to the container in its config file using its
device major and minor number, such as:
lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 247:0 rwm
lxc.mount.entry = /dev/uio0 dev/uio0 none bind,create=file
Where, you get the 247:0 from the output of
ls -l /dev/uio0
If you are trying to
Sorry, there is a typo, it should be:
lxc.mount.entry=/mnt/huge /var/lib/lxc/$container_name/rootfs/mnt/huge none
rw,bind 0 0
From: Admin mailto:anj...@juniper.net>>
Date: Thursday, September 25, 2014 7:48 AM
To: LXC users mailing-list
mailto:lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org>>
Subject: Re: [l
Hi,
I notice that If I add my beth link to any other bridge except lxcbr0, my
ubuntu container takes a really long time to boot up, and seems to hang/wait
for a long time after this statement:
* Starting Bridge socket events into upstart ...done.
My config file is:
…….
# Network configurati
eth0
>
>This is assuming that you are on a new enough lxc so that
>the other veth endpoint is in fact being attached to br-int.
>Which version are you using?
>
>Quoting Anjali Kulkarni (anj...@juniper.net):
>> Hi,
>>
>> I notice that If I add my beth link to an
014 at 08:53:07PM +, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I notice that If I add my beth link to any other bridge except lxcbr0,
>>my ubuntu container takes a really long time to boot up, and seems to
>>hang/wait for a long time after this statement:
>> * Star
>auto eth0
>iface eth0 inet static
>address 172.16.0.2
>netmask 255.255.255.0
>gateway 172.16.0.1
>
>dns-nameservers 172.16.0.1
> dns-search mydomain.com
>
>Or whatever the right config is for your network.
>
>On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 09:37:3
>> inet addr:172.16.0.2 Bcast:172.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
>
>
>I guess that's the reason why the containers DHCPD-client still wait
>until timeout. Maybe you should take a look at the containers console log
>while startup to clarify where the intermission occur
want that bridge
name, but want to use my own..
Thanks,
Anjali
On 10/2/14 11:50 AM, "Anjali Kulkarni" wrote:
>Thanks Guido, very good point! I don't know where that other MAC is coming
>from.
>Also, lxcbr0 works, that is boots quickly, so something is different about
Ok, I found it(lxcbr0), its defined and created via /etc/default/lxc-net.
On 10/2/14 4:20 PM, "Anjali Kulkarni" wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>What I found was that if I keep lxcbr0, but add more bridges, it works and
>boots fine(very quickly).
>Eg.
>
>lxc.network.type
Hi ,
I was trying to make libvirt work with containers, so I created the container
with lxc-create and then used the virsh define command to define the container
xml file, but it gives me the error shown at the end:
root@/scripts#lxc-create -t ubuntu -n cn-name
root@/scripts# virsh -c lxc:// d
Hi,
I am trying to define a container using libvirt, and I need to allow access of
the device /dev/uio0 on the host on the container as well. That is, I have the
following line in the container config file:
lxc.mount.entry = /dev/uio0 dev/uio0 none bind,create=file
lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c
It seems at a high level LXCD and docker can be used to achieve the same
functionality - lightweight VMs...
What's the purpose or benefit or plus minus of using one or the other? Is there
some document describing when or where to use which?
Anjali
On Nov 28, 2014, at 3:10 PM, "Stéphane Graber"
Hi,
I have been using LXC container and VM started on a host machine simultaneously
for a while. However, recently on using another machine, I see that either one
can be started, but not both.
If the /cgroups is mounted, then the LXC starts, but the VM(started via
libvirt) does not, giving the
Since there is no real device emulation, I am wondering how network
interfaces which can be added to linux bridges are implemented? Is it some
kind of sockets and what kind of support needed to be added to the bridges
to have this supported? Is it possible to connect these LXC network
interfaces to
Thanks Serge!
What I was wondering is how this veth (tunnel or endpoints) is implemented
in code? Is it like a TCP/IP socket connection over which packets are sent
from one endpoint to other? Can you point me to this code?
On 1/31/15, 11:26 PM, "Serge Hallyn" wrote:
>Quoting An
Hi,
The following link mentions booting an Ubuntu VM inside a container:
(https://www.stgraber.org/2012/03/04/booting-an-ubuntu-12-04-virtual-machine-in-an-lxc-container/)
However I had 2 qs
1. If we do boot a VM inside the container as mentioned in the article, would
it be of any use like a nor
part. Does that make sense?
On 2/19/15, 6:51 PM, "Fajar A. Nugraha" wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Anjali Kulkarni
>wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The following link mentions booting an Ubuntu VM inside a container:
>>
>>(https://www.stgraber.org/2
graha" wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Anjali Kulkarni
>wrote:
>> Thanks, so for networking to work, all you need to do is add the
>> networking links to the config file in /var/lib/lxc/ and then
>> networking should work in the VM as it would in a normal LXC.
ps create /dev/net/tun, and give the needed cgroup.devices access.
>
>-serge
>
>Quoting Anjali Kulkarni (anj...@juniper.net):
>> There is a reason for it, but I can’t discuss that. There is enough
>> reason, and I know you would need some funky stuff (access stuff on
>>
Hi,
I started a process within a container, however, when I 'ps' the process on the
host I can see it running. How can one differentiate or check which processes
are running inside the container?
Thanks
Anjali
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@list
Hi,
I brought up a container on a host system, mounting some directories from host
on it. Works fine. Now I tried to create another container but it seems to
mount in the wrong place and gives an error in lxc-start:
lxc-start -n c2
lxc-start: No such file or directory - failed to mount '/HugePa
Folks,
I figured this out, its because the directory does not exist in the container.
Thanks!
Anjali
From: Anjali Kulkarni mailto:anj...@juniper.net>>
Reply-To: LXC users mailing-list
mailto:lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org>>
Date: Friday, February 27, 2015 at 3:14 PM
To: LXC u
Hi,
Is there a way to install packages (like bridge utils etc) on some template
like ubuntu while creating it via lxc-create? I read somewhere about --packages
command but don't seem to find it anywhere. I want to create a container and
install packages on it via a script without manually havin
uid/gids, pay
attention when you do this procedure (generally before uidmapshift step).
b.
On 28 February 2015 at 23:54, Anjali Kulkarni
mailto:anj...@juniper.net>> wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to install packages (like bridge utils etc) on some template
like ubuntu while creating it via lxc
I tried to add a lxc.hook.start, and pointing to a simple script.
However, on trying to start the container I get this error:
lxc-start -n c8
lxc-start: invalid sequence number 1. expected 4
lxc-start: failed to spawn Œc8'
lxc-start: Device or resource busy - cgroup_rmdir: failed to delete
/cgroup
Thanks, that does not work either.
Is this broken?
On 3/2/15, 10:22 PM, "Fajar A. Nugraha" wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Tamas Papp wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On March 3, 2015 12:03:06 AM Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>>> I tried to a
urce busy
- cgroup_rmdir: failed to delete /cgroup/lxc/c11-1
For some reason, it creates another container with ³-1² suffix.
ls /cgroup/lxc/
Shows:
c11
c11-1
Before starting this container, there was no c11 or c11-1.
ThANKS
Anjali
On 3/4/15, 2:36 PM, "Fajar A. Nugraha" wrote:
>
Hi,
In general to set up bridging on a nested container system, I set up a bridge
on the host, and then another bridge within the container. The base container's
veth is added to host bridge and the nested container's veth is added to the
bridge within the base container. I can ping between 2 n
Correcting the Subject.
Hi,
In general to set up bridging on a nested container system, I set up a bridge
on the host, and then another bridge within the container. The base container's
veth is added to host bridge and the nested container's veth is added to the
bridge within the base containe
Sorry, I didn¹t phrase this correctly.
What I meant is I ok to bypass the base container (don¹t need bridging
connectivity to it), but just want to expose the host bridge to the nested
container.
Anjali
On 3/11/15, 2:14 PM, "Fajar A. Nugraha" wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:
host by changing it's namespace, isn't it?
>
>But because this will need the "cooperation" of the host environment to
>start a nested container from the first level container, which will
>undermine the nesting szenario.
>
>
>Dear Anjali,
>
>what&
I mean “bypass the networking (and bridge) on *base* LXC"
On 3/12/15, 12:35 PM, "Anjali Kulkarni" wrote:
>Thanks Fajar and Guido.
>The use case for this is that I don’t want to have double the no of IP and
>MACs for each interface I want on the nested container. I want t
42 matches
Mail list logo
