low that limit and possibly generated an error on
container startup. I think it's a kernel limit and not configurable or
negotiable, but that was a couple of years ago and may have changed.
YMMV
> Thanks.
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
n may be a quirk in the way the bind mounts are
executed by lxc in setting up the container. If the "ls" hack works,
you could automate this in one of the hook scripts to get the autofs
file systems premounted.
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
> André
>
>
>
>
> ___
ere is currently no lxc.hook.destroy. A patch to add it
> would be welcome as a conversation piece, though we'd have to
> think about it to decide whether it makes sense. I think it might.
I concur it might. I could envision some sort of external registry or
interface that could be si
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 11:08 -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 09:00:22AM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 14:54 +1000, Boyok Mad wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > >
> > > I want to disable 32bit emulation withi
; config should look like? if not, is there anyway to disable 32bit
> emulation within a lxc container?
>
>
> P.S. I tried removing support for i386 packages within a container,
> but it still runs 32bit binaries.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Boy
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfie
while you work through any
startup errors that ensue when you start it up.
Assuming (and this can be a very BAD assumption) that SLES 11SP3 has a
kernel that supports containers, it should work. But it can take some
work...
> -N
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 9
r/share/lxc/templates/lxc-fedora and see
how that fares. AFAIK, they SHOULD be compatible. There really weren't
any major changes in there that would be branch specific.
> Cheers,
> -Martin
Regards,
Mike
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Michael H. Warfield
> wrote:
> > C
Couple of minor corrections and details...
Where ever I referred to release 1.1.0, I meant 1.1.2 in several places
below.
Also... Rev 1.1.1 is currently in Fedora Rawhide but 1.0.7 is the
latest in Fedora 21 updates.
Regards,
Mike
On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 12:49 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote
e of further assistance to help squash down these bugs.
I don't know that there are any plans for a 1.0.8 release or how fast
that would be picked up by Fedora.
You might want to file a bugzilla report with Fedora against Fedora 21.
I don't know that there are any plans for a 1.0.8 rele
_
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
>
>
>
> ___
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users@
On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 16:17 -0400, Chris Burroughs wrote:
> On 04/01/2015 12:54 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > Doing a read-only bind mount is marginal at best. We've had issues with
> > remounts in containers propagating out (that I think/hope are finally
> > fixed
___
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
>
> ___
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> htt
y. Not having links
from /var/{run,locks} into / is known to break things on Fedora and
CentOS 7. Not a systemd problem.
>
> Philip
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw
___
> > lxc-users mailing list
> > lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
>
> ___________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxc
or anything) but I'm not sure I would take that risk either.
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best
ts
is in Bridged or Routed mode, the containers of the NATed host may ping
the containers of the other host but not vice versa. If both are in
either Bridged or Routed mode, then they can fully ping each other.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Best Regards.
>
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. W
On Sun, 2015-03-22 at 12:54 +1000, Mark Constable wrote:
> On 22/03/15 02:12, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > Append "linux" to the end of those lines in each file so it reads like
> > this (for tty1.conf)
> >
> > exec /sbin/getty -8 38400 tty1 linux
>
>
org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
> ___________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
> _
d over the whole systemd detection and the
problem with kmsg (which is really journald) so I'm very tardy in
getting those changes in.
> 10x
> tamas
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://w
ion of shadow to get
> > > > >> > you
> > > > >> > /etc/subuid and /etc/subgid as well as newuidmap and newgidmap.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > You can read more about that requirement of lxd at:
> > > > >> > - https://github.com/lxc
ob/master/specs/userns-idmap.md
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Stéphane Graber
> >> > Ubuntu developer
> >> > http://www.ubuntu.com
> >> >
> >> > ___
> >> > lxc-users mailing list
> >> >
nts of data per SQL
query, the performance of the TCP connection for your local
container-to-container connections is not going to be your bottleneck
and NFS would only make things worse.
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Serge Hallyn
> wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wi
xc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> >> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> > ___
> > lxc-users mailing list
> > lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-use
Fedora 21 is a paradigm shift. There are now branches for desktop
and server. What are you running and what have you installed on it?
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittse
s there for some corner cases with group
memberships.
> Am I right??
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in th
e the differences between
what your script is doing and what stock is doing.
>
> And, .. I will be on holidays the next 12 days, ...
Ah... I'm just coming off and so much to catch up on. Enjoy!
>
> Greetings, ..
Regards,
Mike
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Michael H. W
t's being refused. While you're in there, commend out
this line and see if it makes a difference:
sessionrequired pam_loginuid.so
The whole pam loginuid thing is a problem in containers. Doesn't
explain why I don't see it through...
> Thank you very much.
>
Regards,
M
late, download template)?
5) Version of LXC in the host?
6) How are you logged in? From lxc-start in forground? From
lxc-console? From ssh connection?
> Greetings, ...
>
>
> --
> Király István
> +36 209 753 758
> lak...@d250.hu
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (A
setting
up a more current host. The backports will not be maintainable or
supportable as well.
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist
By: Michael Coss
>Length: 15min
>
> - Title: How far are we from running distributions inside containers?
>By: Amir Goldstein and Oren Laadan
>Length: unknown
>
>
>
>
> Looking forward to seeing you all next week!
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfi
t; ___
> > lxc-users mailing list
> > lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> ___
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users@lists.
t link is in your host system /dev, you have hosed something up
seriously. That should be a device (but only in the host /dev).
> Regards,
> Daniel Miranda
>
> ___
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 15:05 +, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 13:53 +, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > > > On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 19:39 -0
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 13:53 +, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 19:39 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 23:56 +0100, Chris wrote:
> > > > On 30/09/14 19:28, Michael H
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 19:39 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 23:56 +0100, Chris wrote:
> > On 30/09/14 19:28, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > >> I haven't looked a whole lot into the premade containers, my gut feeling
> > >> was
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 23:56 +0100, Chris wrote:
> On 30/09/14 19:28, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> >> I haven't looked a whole lot into the premade containers, my gut feeling
> >> was that I didn't want to download a whole operating system from this
> >
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 17:45 +0100, Chris wrote:
> On 30/09/14 16:47, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 15:46 +0100, Chris wrote:
> >> On 29/09/14 21:46, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> >>> Hm, sorry, not looking deeper right now, but :
> >>>
>
%s/%s."
> % logic(path, offset))
>
> def chid(path, offset):
> p, _, _, u, g = logic(path, offset)
> os.lchown(path, u, g)
>
> def verbose(path, offset):
> report(path, offset)
> chid(path, offset)
> report(path, offset)
>
> for cu
nf - Creating initial
> > consoles under /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lxc/rootfs/dev
> > lxc-start 1411807327.954 INFO lxc_conf - Populating /dev under
> > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lxc/rootfs
> > lxc-start 1411807327.954 ERRORlxc_conf - Operation not
host.
> Regards,
> Krishna
> --
> Intel Shannon Limited
> Registered in Ireland
> Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County
> Kildare
> Registered Number: 308263
> Business address: Dromore House, East Park, Shannon, Co. Clare
>
some patch warnings due to others submitting some warning
changes in parallel patches.
I would recommend monitoring the -devel list for further (cough)
developments (yes, pun intended).
Regards,
Mike
On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 12:06 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> This was due to a refactoring o
ate. You may
have to wait until Stéphane integrates the patches and regenerates the
image.
> Regards,
> Dongsheng
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: M
cp for it, and configure the wlan0 interface for "proxy arp". That
should work but is also (cough) non-trivial.
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC wh
scripts.
For that purpose, lxc-net (if it exists) is linked to init.d/lxc-net and
lxc-autostarthelper (or, now, lxc-containers depending on patches) is
linked to init.d/lxc for the sysvinit scripts.
> --Vitaly
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wi
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> > > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> > ___
> > lxc-users mailing list
> > lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-user
lxc-execute but, yeah, doing it with a full
container will work. I've done that with entire desktops.
> --
> Fajar
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/
even totally sure if passing ":0" across
into a container would work either, as the system local display
connection may not be available in the container.
> Jimmy
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678)
>
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > lxc-users mailing list
> > lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> > http://lists.linuxcontainer
wever).
3) Shut the container down and restart.
Templates configuring containers for systemd should both set autodev = 1
and kmsg = 0. I'll be updating the CentOS, Fedora, and OpenSUSE
templates.
Regards,
Mike
On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 13:22 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07
n there would be to use a user crontab.
crontab -e
@reboot lxc-autostart -P {path to user directory) -g {bootgroups}
Each user could then setup and control their own. I would not set up
something on a systemwide basis to scan the user directories. Here
there be dragons.
Regards,
Mike
--
Mich
ns.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>> Anjali
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ___________
> >>>> l
Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-user
;
> >> > again just my opinion
> >> >
> >> > Brian
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______
> >> > lxc-users mailing list
> >> > lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
>
e the patches themselves or offer a bounty to
> > have it done for them.
> >
> > again just my opinion
> >
> > Brian
> >
> >
> > ___
> > lxc-users mailing list
> > lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.or
On Sat, 2014-08-09 at 09:26 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-08-09 at 02:39 -0400, CDR wrote:
> > make rpm fails.
> Point of order... Things like this should be reported to the lxc-devel
> list. This is not a "user" issue but a "development" is
ser-nic
> Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>/usr/lib/systemd/system/lxc-net.service
> make: *** [rpm] Error 1
> ___
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/list
ge the run level at run time, e.g.
> >> >>> 'telinit 2' to switch to run level 2 (to start your containers).
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hope this helps
> >> >>> Harri
> >> >>>
> >>
he__
> >>>
> >>> lxc-users mailing list
> >>> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> >>> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> >>
> >>
> >>
LXC
> container. If get time, I make additional test for detect conditions
> where such interference occurred.
Same remark. Some of the systemd rework includes setting up the
[am]getty services.
> p.s.
> and may be LXC project has own bugzilla ?
> b.r.
> Maxim Kozin
Regards,
Mik
/systemd/systemd-journald
> 248 ?R+ 0:00 ps ax
>
>
> I disable kmsg in container config (lxc.kmsg = 0) and delete symlink
> /var/lib/lxc/ce7-2/rootfs.dev/kmsg
> and problem go away, after start systemd-journald not cycled.
>
> Probably centos template must d
>
> ___
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruse
, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Ajith Adapa
> wrote:
> Filled a bug in Fedora Bugzilla @
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115728
>
> Regards,
> Ajith
>
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Michael H. Warfield
> wrot
oad"
> >> template (lxc-create -t download ...). It'd be MUCH faster.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Fajar
> >> ___
> >> lxc-users mailing list
> >> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> >&
On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 13:11 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 10:07 +0530, Ajith Adapa wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I am trying to create a ubuntu container in Fedora 20 host and it
> > fails as shown below
>
> > # lxc-create -t ubuntu -n ubuntute
plate will
be similarly broken. Someone probably needs to open a bugzilla ticket
up at the Fedora Project bugzilla.
> --
> Regards,
> Ajith
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.w
ply, the message bus security policy blocked the
> reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was
> broken.Unit dbus.socket entered failed state.
>
> <35>systemd-logind[318]: Failed to fully start up daemon: Connection refused
> systemd-logind.service: main pro
sical" network types. It definitely
needs to be tested.
> I will try out the steps given regarding password.
Cool.
> Regards,
> Ajith
Regards,
Mike
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Michael H. Warfield
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-06-28 at 15:34 +0530, Ajith Adapa wrote:
>
_
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
&g
abled
> Network namespace: enabled
> Multiple /dev/pts instances: enabled
>
> --- Control groups ---
> Cgroup: enabled
> Cgroup clone_children flag: enabled
> Cgroup device: enabled
> Cgroup sched: enabled
> Cgroup cpu account: enabled
> Cgroup memory controller: enabled
&
oint me at it, though I won't be able
to get to it in the next week.
Regards,
Mike
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Michael H. Warfield
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 09:42 -0400, CDR wrote:
> >> I already created a new Ubuntu Host and the container works
systemd source and see under what conditions the two
> > lines above occur.
> >
> > ___
> > lxc-users mailing list
> > lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> ___
>
never
> tested the interaction between Serge's cgmanager code and my cgroup
> mounting code...
>
> If you are running cgmanager, could you try the same while cgmanager
> being stopped? Then LXC should fall back to the cgfs code, which
> *should* work in this case, unless s
e container, thus running that
command in the host is totally meaningless.
> > Two suggestions for investigating:
> > 1. create a new fedora container on the ubuntu host, see if it
> > has the same behavior.
1a: If it works on the Ubuntu host, transported it to the Fedora host
nal efforts (probably a big one) to
> > "merge" them to the same template while verifying that it still works.
>
> However, that's correct, if that happened, they could be maintained more
> easily together(*). Eg. if there is a change, all template script coul
we work on the
distros we're most familiar with and nobody is familiar with them all.
I maintain the Fedora and CentOS templates, I'm familiar with the Oracle
and Ubuntu templates, and I've stuck my nose in OpenSUSE long enough to
spot a few bugs. I wouldn't think abo
or an fstab entry in your config. If that's not
what you mean, then you need to be more specific in what you are trying
to do.
>
> What does the addition to 'config' look like?
>
>
> Then update the docs. Network, storage, process. Need all three.
Regards,
Mike
--
Yes, I'm cross posting this.
This article on LXC and Docker (heavy on the LXC) is up on Linux
Journal.
Disclaimer: I was on of the article reviewers.
http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/linux-containers-and-future-cloud
Enjoy.
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978
On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 16:51 -0400, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 03:43:12PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:43:12 -0400
> > From: "Michael H. Warfield"
> > To: LXC users mailing-list
> > Subj
t;
> --
> Király István
> +36 209 753 758
> lak...@d250.hu
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> ___
> lxc-users
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 10:55 -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:36:57AM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > Stéphane,
> >
> > On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 10:12 -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:07:05AM -0400, Shidan wro
be a ways off.
IAC, I think it's broken outside of using the host global lxcpath right
now.
Regards,
Mike
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Michael H. Warfield
> wrote:
> Stéphane,
>
> On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 10:12 -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>
and exit at shutdown time or have
> that happen at user session open time but then what about ssh sessions,
> ...).
I think there's also a problem in the way lxc-autostart is handling the
-P option(s) that would complicate this for user based containers
outside of the global l
in your configuration file
but I haven't chased the logic path on that one down yet. Stephane
probably needs to chime in on this.
>
Regards
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
out itself
but the lack of its presence in this configuration is curious.
For another, if your running this on an Ubuntu server, as indicated in
your subject, you most likely need to set the apparour profile like
this:
lxc.aa_profile = unconfined
This has caused systemd failures just like what
em. Glad to be of help.
> Regards,
> Ajith
Regards,
Mike
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 09:22 +0530, Ajith Adapa wrote:
> >> @Michael
> >
> >> Sorry seems I have shared wrong log in previous mail. As
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 09:44 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 09:22 +0530, Ajith Adapa wrote:
> > @Michael
>
> > Sorry seems I have shared wrong log in previous mail. As you can see I
> > have commented the line in all files under /ete/pam.
tarted Trigger Flushing of Journal to Persistent Storage.
> > Starting Permit User Sessions...
> > [ OK ] Started Login Service.
> > [ OK ] Started System Logging Service.
> > [ OK ] Started Permit User Sessions.
> > Starting Getty on tty3.
Started Console Getty.
> [ OK ] Reached target Login Prompts.
> [ OK ] Reached target Multi-User System.
>
> Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
> Kernel 3.14.4-200.fc20.x86_64 on an x86_64 (console)
> test login:
Ok... And what happens when you try to log in as root with
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
>
> From: "Michael H. Warfield"
> To: LXC users mailing-list
>
> Cc:
> Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 14:23:48 -0400
> Subject: Re: [lxc-users] lxc-fedora template
C 2014 on console
> There were 3 failed login attempts since the last successful login.
>
> Cannot make/remove an entry for the specified session
^^^
This is the smoking gun. This indicates precisely and exactly that you
are ru
s mailing list
> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
>
>
>
> --
> Király István
> +36 209 753 758
> lak...@d250.hu
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses an
Further information:
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 12:57 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Hello,
> On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 02:10 +1100, Dmitry Kolesov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > I created container from lxc-fedora template. My operation system is
> > Fedora
hose lines are commented out, you should be able to log in.
That's all assuming what I'm guessing you are running but it's
consistent with what I would expect.
I would also strongly recommend upgrading to 1.0.3 or 1.0.4 when it's
out, if you're not already there. 1.0.4 is
let it go. For me, that was most often a lost
interrupt or spinlock in the kernel. I'd be curious to know what wait
channel it's sitting on and if anything changes after a subsequent -9.
A -9 should even break a resource deadly embrace, still, any change in
that WCHAN would be intere
nated but not reaped by
its parent
--
State T is "stopped by job control signal"
In this case, though, it seems like the kernel is treating this init
process as if it were in state D, uninterruptible sleep, which even a
SIGKILL will not interrupt.
> Until that
>
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 22:15 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Michael H. Warfield
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:04 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>
>
> >
> > > lxc-stop doesn't work without "-k"
been an arms race out there for years. I did run
into some malware that was virtualization aware and recognized a VMware
hypervisor, Microsoft's HyperV, and VirtualBox. but it didn't recognize
XEN. PITA to analyze.
OTOH, using HW virt and it's snapshot capabilities had enabled me
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 15:33 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Michael H. Warfield
> > wrote:
> >> Serge,
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 15:31 +, S
Serge,
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 15:31 +, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:04 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
[SNIP]
> > > With the unconfied apparmor profile, it works as expected
> > >
> > &g
On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 10:58 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 14:18 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Timotheus Pokorra
> > wrote:
> > Hello Federico,
> > that is strange.
> > I trie
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
