Hi!
I suppose there is something specific to your installation that gives
this issue.
There is not enough information yet apart from the error message
regarding the container configuration.
You can
lxc list ^webpagetest$
lxc config show --expanded webpagetest
Also, you can append `--debug` to
Hi All,
I updated the guide on running GUI apps in LXD containers,
https://blog.simos.info/how-to-easily-run-graphics-accelerated-gui-apps-in-lxd-containers-on-your-ubuntu-desktop/
Now it is much more automated and easier to use.
Especially, if you use the snap package of LXD, you can just
Most likely it is the limitNPROC issue.
Specifically, there is a configuration option for limitNPROC to 10 in
the configuration of OpenVPN.
Normally, that should be fine because OpenVPN does not appear to
launch more than 10 processes.
However, the mere existence of the limit might be causing the
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Michel Jansens
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just stumbled on this site and thought it would be nice to share:
>
> https://hicu.be/bridge-vs-macvlan
>
> It nicely explains how Macvlan work and how it compares with normal bridges.
> In the case of
According to this, https://github.com/lxc/lxd/issues/2004
the "Failed to reset devices.list ..." can be ignored.
There should be some additional lines earlier (not shown) that have a
hint towards the real issue.
This "InCronD" is probably using "inotify". Search for "inotify" at
These 192.168.111.x IP addresses are not LXD default private IP addresses.
Have you configured a bridge or a macvlan?
Simos
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 11:16 PM, jjs - mainphrame wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Running lxd-3.0.0 on ubuntu 18.04 beta
>
> I've set up a couple of new 16.04
that gets the .deb package
and will keep having it until 2018+5=2023.
Ubuntu 16.04 will keep having LXD 2.0.x from the deb repositories
until 2016+5=2021.
Is it such an issue to have the snap version of LXD?
Simos
>
> On 3/29/2018 8:44 PM, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 29,
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:32 AM, gunnar.wagner
wrote:
>
>
> On 3/28/2018 2:45 AM, Michel Jansens wrote:
>>
>> Does this means LXD 3.0 will be part of Ubuntu 18.04 next month?
>
> I guess (as LXD is using snap packages by default, right) it's not a matter
> of
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Let's run this in a LXD container:
>
> container# cat /dev/urandom|gzip - >/dev/null
>
>
> Then see what CPU usage "ps auxf" shows (3rd column):
>
> container# ps auxf
> USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY
I got it running without doing something very special,
according to https://blog.simos.info/how-to-run-docker-in-a-lxd-container/
There is the issue with the storage driver, being vfs.
What storage backend do you have for your LXD installation?
Simos
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Björn
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 3:34 AM, Pierre Couderc wrote:
> Sorry, I have not fount it.
>
> I have installed LXD on stretch following Stéphane
> https://stgraber.org/2017/01/18/lxd-on-debian.
>
> Fine ! an infinite progress after my successful install of lxc on jessie,
> it
Hi Vincent,
You may find of help the following blog post,
https://blog.simos.info/how-to-initialize-lxd-again/
It talks about reinstalling LXD and how to deal with common issues.
I did not notice a "error: Invalid version format: Dnsmasq" before.
LXD installs and uses the package "dnsmasq-base".
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Adil Baig wrote:
> I have several containers running on host machines. The host machine is part
> of a LAN network. Each host has an update /etc/hosts file with domain names
> to other LAN entities.
>
> My problem is I cannot use the
d these commands to the turorial!
Simos
> Regards,
> Max
>
> On 4 May 2017 at 18:56, Simos Xenitellis <simos.li...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Lago Gonzalez, Diego
>> <diego.lago-gonza...@hp.com> wrote:
>> >
&g
ese things. There should be bugs and
issues waiting to be discovered and reported.
Simos
> —
> Diego Lago
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: lxc-users [mailto:lxc-users-boun...@lists.linuxcontainers.org] On
> Behalf Of Simos Xenitellis
> Sent: jueves, 04 de mayo de 20
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:56 AM, T.C 吳天健 wrote:
> Per my previous mail mentioned 'chrome working but not gain 3d acceleration'
> was documented and shared as
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1DcxNYlXgYLIWKQG8sbg8POk-uxl9I1Kgi9W3ti_1MbQ/edit?usp=sharing
>
> The report
Hi All,
I completed the tutorial on how to run graphics-accelerated GUI apps
in (local) LXD containers,
https://blog.simos.info/how-to-run-graphics-accelerated-gui-apps-in-lxd-containers-on-your-ubuntu-desktop/
Compared to the previous post, this one has sound and also shows how
to create a
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:09 PM, <sjo...@sjomar.eu> wrote:
> May 2, 2017 1:19 PM, "Simos Xenitellis" <simos.li...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All!
>>
>> I wrote the following on how to run GUI apps in an LXD container,
>> https://blog.simos
Hi All!
I wrote the following on how to run GUI apps in an LXD container,
https://blog.simos.info/how-to-run-wine-graphics-accelerated-in-an-lxd-container-on-ubuntu/
The common case is when we run already Ubuntu desktop and we want to
get a GUI app
to run in a container and the window to appear
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha <l...@fajar.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Simos Xenitellis
> <simos.li...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've put together my notes about running LXD on those new ARM64 c
Hi All,
I've put together my notes about running LXD on those new ARM64 cloud
servers by Scaleway.
tl;dr:
1. These are inexpensive cloud servers. Not baremetal, but KVM. On
ARM64 (Cavium ThunderX) hardware.
2. The Linux kernel lacks ZFS support, thus requires to compile it by
hand. Takes time
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 5:11 AM, gunnar.wagner
<gunnar.wag...@netcologne.de> wrote:
> hi Simos,
>
> On 4/21/2017 7:47 PM, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:33 PM, gunnar.wagner
>> <gunnar.wag...@netcologne.de> wrote:
>>>
>&
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> TL;dr:
>
> For Ubuntu 16.04 users who have lxd-2.0.9 from xenial-updates,
> what is the fast path towards simple lxd container-on-the-lan happiness?
> (Extra credit: allow ssh between the host and the guest, also part of
> Things
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:33 PM, gunnar.wagner
wrote:
> is there any how-to about which options to choose and why during the 'lxd
> init' process available anywhere?
>
I am interested in writing something up about this. I have a draft on my blog..
What I would
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:34 AM, gunnar.wagner
wrote:
> just saw it again
>
> 'lxc-[cmd]' (LXC Containers) vs
> 'lxc [cmd]' (LXD Containers)
>
> it would be so much less confusing whether LXD would just use 'lxd [cmd]'
> instead of 'lxc [cmd]' syntax
step,
or tell me that all have been completed successfully (so we can go
through the fourth step).
Simos
>
> Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Norberto
>
>
>
>
> 2017-04-17 8:42 GMT-03:00 Simos Xenitellis <simos.li...@googlemail.com>:
>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Norberto Bensa
<nbensa+lxcus...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Simos,
>
> 2017-04-13 10:44 GMT-03:00 Simos Xenitellis <simos.li...@googlemail.com>:
>> I got stuck with this issue (Ubuntu Desktop with NetworkManager) and
>> wrot
I got stuck with this issue (Ubuntu Desktop with NetworkManager) and
wrote about it at
https://www.mail-archive.com/lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org/msg07060.html
I do not have a fresh Ubuntu machine handy; doesn't "lxd init"
populate automatically
the appropriate directory (whether it is for
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:53 PM, John Lewis wrote:
> I build an LXC network on my VPS to separate all of my personal service
> from each other how similar they are to each other while not having to
> buy more VPS that I don't utilize intensely. Both my containers and my
> host
Hi All,
I just figured out that it is possible, and available by default, to
use the domain names of the LXD containers FROM the server.
It has been quite confusing, and could not get it working, so I am
documenting this here.
Let's get a list of the containers and try to access by DNS the
First of all, now it's working as Stéphane wrote earlier.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Sergiusz Pawlowicz
<sergi...@pawlowicz.name> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Simos Xenitellis
> <simos.li...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I just tri
he container.
If it has not been created yet, you can "sleep 1", and check again.
Keep checking until the account gets created.
Simos
> Francesco
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Simos Xenitellis
> <simos.li...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On
Hi All,
I just tried "lxc image list ubuntu:" and I do not see any 16.04 images.
(i.e. lxc launch ubuntu:x mycontainer fails).
I attach the output of "lxc image list ubuntu:".
I suppose it is a temporary issue, just logging it here.
Simos
image-list-no-x.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Francesco Longo wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm playing with Raspberry Pi virtualization, i.e., in few words, creating
> LXD containers on top of a Raspberry Pi and attaching to them a couple of
> FUSE filesystems mirroring the GPIO /sys/class/gpio
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Simos Xenitellis
<simos.li...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am writing a post on LXD and
> 1. how to run "lxd init" again (keeping the ZFS allocated space)
> 2. how to run "lxd init" again (clearing up the ZFS all
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 7:18 PM, MonkZ wrote:
> hi,
>
> i have storage issues after an upgrade:
>
> from lxd 2.8 to lxd 2.11, using ppa on ubuntu 16.04LTS.
>
> Apparently zfs.img moved to disks/lxd.zfs in /var/lib/lxd/ causing zfs
> to fail to start via zfs-import-cache.service.
>
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Marat Khalili wrote:
>> The other way is to leave in /var/lib/lxc/NAME/config only [...] and have:
>> [...] in /var/lib/lxc/NAME/rootfs/etc/network/interfaces. Then everything
>> works.
>
>> Which way is better?
>
> I also stumbled on nameservers issue
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Again seeing this issue on one of the servers:
>
> - "lxc stop container" will stop the container but will never exit
> - "lxc restart container" will stop the container and will never exit
>
>
> # dpkg -l|grep lxd
> ii
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Benoit GEORGELIN - Association
Web4all wrote:
> Hi lxc-users ,
>
> I would like to know if you have any experience with a large number of
> LXC/LXD containers ?
> In term of performance, stability and limitation .
>
> I'm wondering
Hi All,
I am writing a post on LXD and
1. how to run "lxd init" again (keeping the ZFS allocated space)
2. how to run "lxd init" again (clearing up the ZFS allocated space,
allocate fresh space)
3. how to upgrade to the latest (currently 2.11) version
4. how to downgrade
Here is how I plan to
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 5:05 PM, brian mullan wrote:
> Dan
>
> I'd seen that same github on the lxc-desktop by Uwe Stuehler and tried to
> figure out how to contact him but had no luck (his email isn't on his github
> page).
>
> So I added some info to one of my "issues"
ad to the wrong fingerprint being reported (that of the tarball
> instead of squashfs).
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:20:55PM +0300, Andrey Repin wrote:
>> Greetings, Simos Xenitellis!
>>
>> > Hi All,
>>
>> > Until a few weeks ago, the Xenial image (&
Hi All,
If you are in a container, you can access the other containers through
their *.lxd hostnames.
For example, you can
root@c1:~# ping c2.lxd
PING c2.lxd (10.60.113.13) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from oag.lxd (10.60.113.13): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.064 ms
However, if you are outside
Hi All,
Until a few weeks ago, the Xenial image ("ubuntu:x" for x86_64), as reported by
lxc image list ubuntu:
used to be around 140MB.
See, for example,
https://simos.info/blog/playing-around-with-lxd-containers-lxc-on-ubuntu/
(138.23MB)
However, if you run now the same command, the size of
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:19 PM, brian mullan wrote:
> Long time users of LXC and now LXD understand the difference & difference of
> purpose.
>
> However, it seems to me that for newcomers to LXD the continuance of
> reference to LXC seems to cause confusion for those
Hi All,
I have written a few articles on LXD containers and here is the latest,
https://simos.info/blog/how-to-set-up-multiple-secure-ssltls-qualys-ssl-labs-a-websites-using-lxd-containers/
It's about putting websites in different containers, and getting them
accessed through HAProxy (also in a
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Rahul Rawail wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have read some posts in LXC-Users group, honestly we are not very
> proficient with ubuntu or linux itself but we know a bit.
>
> We have been able to start the LXD container but we have a simple
>
47 matches
Mail list logo