Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
> On 03/07/2013 04:54 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> >
> >Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
> >>
> >>hi All,
> >>
> >>At the end of this script it wants to remove the fs in some cases.
> >>But something is wrong about it, as if it's other they are igno
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Papp Tamas wrote:
> Me?
>
> It was not me, who wrote this script:)
Oh sorry.
That's what happen when someone (me) jumps into a thread without
knowing what's going on :-/
Anyway, I think it is a bug. The comment clearly says he doesn't want
to remove the directory
On 03/07/2013 09:43 PM, zoolook wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Papp Tamas wrote:
else
# In case rootfs is not under $lxc_path/$lxc_name, remove it
rm -rf --one-file-system --preserve-root $rootdev
>>
>> But it's removed here.
>
>
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Papp Tamas wrote:
>>> else
>>> # In case rootfs is not under $lxc_path/$lxc_name, remove it
>>> rm -rf --one-file-system --preserve-root $rootdev
>
> But it's removed here.
> Do I miss something?
If you don't want it to
On 03/07/2013 04:54 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
>>
>> hi All,
>>
>> At the end of this script it wants to remove the fs in some cases.
>> But something is wrong about it, as if it's other they are ignored.
>
> Sorry I don't understand - what is being ignor
Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
>
> hi All,
>
> At the end of this script it wants to remove the fs in some cases.
> But something is wrong about it, as if it's other they are ignored.
Sorry I don't understand - what is being ignored in which cases?
> # Deduce the type of rootfs
> #
