Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] Suggestion: merge lxqt-runner & lxqt-panel

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Kuzma Shapran wrote: > On 20 November 2013 17:37, Alexis Lopez Zubieta < > azubi...@estudiantes.uci.cu> wrote: > >> Hello people: >> >> Did you ever read my emails? >> > > In fact, I have almost hundred unread emails in my inbox. Your message > quite can be there

Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] Suggestion: merge lxqt-runner & lxqt-panel

On 20 November 2013 17:37, Alexis Lopez Zubieta wrote: > Hello people: > > Did you ever read my emails? > In fact, I have almost hundred unread emails in my inbox. Your message quite can be there as well. Some day I hope to read them all ;-) > Months ago I tell you about an experiment that i

Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] Suggestion: merge lxqt-runner & lxqt-panel

Hello people: Did you ever read my emails? Months ago I tell you about an experiment that i was doing, did you remember https://github.com/azubieta/lxqt-core. Well this "experiment" already has a "shell" or a "core" and has some of the components of the desktop as dinamic libruaries (panel and

Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] Suggestion: merge lxqt-runner & lxqt-panel

I agree - it's worth a try. And you have raised an interesting point about IPC. If the session starts (and monitors) only one instance of lxqt-shell, then it's not a question - all modules are libraries within the same process, but we allow to start several separate processes of lxqt-shell (we mig

Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] DESKTOP_SESSION environment variable

I support the idea. If xdg-tools can fully support the standards, it does not matter whether it knows lxde-qt or not. PCManFM and PCManFM-Qt both uses gio provided by glib which implements the xdg standards. So, calling pcmanfm has nearly the same effects as calling gvfs-open The only things pcma

Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] Re: lxqt github repos workflow

2013/11/19 PCMan > > I really think that the current lxqt-panel code looks good enough. > With proper API doc, it should be easy enough to develop new modules. > The grid layout works as expected, too. > Everything works out of the box and it's a great panel already. > What's your plan about the

Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] Suggestion: merge lxqt-runner & lxqt-panel

Kuzma, I have the same idea in my mind for quite a long time, too. This can be done easily with the following approach. 1. Replace every main(int argc, int argv) to _main(int argc, int argv); 2. Modify CMakeLists and replace add_executable() with add_library() so every components are now libs. 3.

[Lxde-list] Debian LXDE: testing migration problems

Hello! Is there any progress in uploading the updated versions of the following packages: lxlauncher, lxappearance, lxappearance-obconf, menu-cache, libfm into Debian archives? Should the packages be uploaded to debian-mentors by active developers with no upload priviliges, to get them reviewe

Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] Suggestion: merge lxqt-runner & lxqt-panel

On 20 November 2013 11:41, Mark Deneen wrote: > If one module crashes, won't the entire process be terminated? > Alas, yes. We should just make sure modules never crash! ;-) Seriously, if panel or desktop app crashes - this is also not a very pleasant event. I remember that in Razor session moni

Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] Suggestion: merge lxqt-runner & lxqt-panel

If one module crashes, won't the entire process be terminated? -M On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Kuzma Shapran wrote: > I've just had a weird idea: make every part of DE as libraries and one > application which just runs these parts alone or together: > lxqt-launcher -panel -runner -desktop -

[Lxde-list] libqt-xdg

Hi, I'm trying to use libqt-xdg. Included there is a simple example: #include #include int main(int argc, char **argv) { qDebug() << XdgDirs::dataDirs(); return 0; } It work fine by running cmake . && make but I try to run it in QtCreator and qmake. What would a corresponding qmake fil

Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] Suggestion: merge lxqt-runner & lxqt-panel

Hello: Kuzma now we are two with the same idea! :-). But I don't want to build the whole desktop from scratch, i want to coordinate the work with the other members of the lxqt project but every one seems to be working by in their own stuff. I will be great if we define a todo list in order to

Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] DESKTOP_SESSION environment variable

2013/11/19 Stephan Sokolow > On 13-11-19 01:10 PM, christ...@surlykke.dk wrote: > > Well, it's a fix, yes. But I think it is wrong to hardwire the use of > > pcmanfm-qt. LXDE-Qt should be a modular desktop system, meaning if a > > user wants to use another file manager, things should still be abl

Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] Re: Proposals about lxsession redesign - Requests for comments

2013/11/19 PCMan > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:07 PM, christ...@surlykke.dk < > christ...@surlykke.dk> wrote: > >> >> 2013/11/13 Jerome Leclanche >> >>> razor-session is buggy and lacking. With systemd-only sessions around >>> >> >> Buggy and lacking? In what ways? It was always stable for me and

Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] Suggestion: merge lxqt-runner & lxqt-panel

I've just had a weird idea: make every part of DE as libraries and one application which just runs these parts alone or together: lxqt-launcher -panel -runner -desktop -whatever Cheers, Kuzma On 12 November 2013 22:41, Alexis López Zubieta wrote: > El 12/11/13 09:35, PCMan escribió: > > On T

Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] DESKTOP_SESSION environment variable

On 13-11-19 01:10 PM, christ...@surlykke.dk wrote: > Well, it's a fix, yes. But I think it is wrong to hardwire the use of > pcmanfm-qt. LXDE-Qt should be a modular desktop system, meaning if a > user wants to use another file manager, things should still be able to > work. That is best achieved (I

Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] DESKTOP_SESSION environment variable

2013/11/19 Julien Lavergne > > > > 2013/11/19 christ...@surlykke.dk > > Hi >> >> Running lxde-qt as my desktop I ran into a small glitch: The script >> startlxde-qt runs: >> >> lxsession -s LXDE-Qt -e LXDE >> >> The -e switch defines name of the desktop environment, and it is stored >> into the

Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] DESKTOP_SESSION environment variable

2013/11/19 christ...@surlykke.dk > Hi > > Running lxde-qt as my desktop I ran into a small glitch: The script > startlxde-qt runs: > > lxsession -s LXDE-Qt -e LXDE > > The -e switch defines name of the desktop environment, and it is stored > into the XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP variable. > > Now, I'm on

Re: [Lxde-list] DESKTOP_SESSION environment variable

Are there any desktops still actively supported which include a PCManFM too old to be storing its file associations in ~/.local/share/applications/mimeapps.list? http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/mime-actions-spec/ If not, I think it'd be better to advocate for patching the LXDE special

[Lxde-list] DESKTOP_SESSION environment variable

Hi Running lxde-qt as my desktop I ran into a small glitch: The script startlxde-qt runs: lxsession -s LXDE-Qt -e LXDE The -e switch defines name of the desktop environment, and it is stored into the XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP variable. Now, I'm on Arch, and use stock xdg-scripts. If I run xdg-open s

Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] Re: Proposals about lxsession redesign - Requests for comments

On 11/19/2013 10:26 AM, PCMan wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:07 PM, christ...@surlykke.dk > > wrote: > > > 2013/11/13 Jerome Leclanche > > > razor-session is buggy and lacking. With systemd-

Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] Re: Proposals about lxsession redesign - Requests for comments

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:07 PM, christ...@surlykke.dk < christ...@surlykke.dk> wrote: > > 2013/11/13 Jerome Leclanche > >> razor-session is buggy and lacking. With systemd-only sessions around >> > > Buggy and lacking? In what ways? It was always stable for me and did what > I needed. > > br. Ch

Re: [Lxde-list] [razor-qt] Re: Proposals about lxsession redesign - Requests for comments

2013/11/13 Jerome Leclanche > razor-session is buggy and lacking. With systemd-only sessions around > Buggy and lacking? In what ways? It was always stable for me and did what I needed. br. Chr. the corner, the need for an actual session manager is lessened (which > is a great thing, honestly)