On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Arnd Hanses wrote:
[...]
> 2) Is it 'legal' to use macros and the pre-processor to avoid ugly code
> and cluttering it with OS-dependent #ifdef's ?
It's generally considered a bad idea to use macros in C++ for two reasons:
macros are not typesafe and C++ allows you to inline
On Thu, Aug 05, 1999 at 09:21:18PM -0600, Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Garst R. Reese wrote:
>
> What about a small section of success stories in the (users) web site?
>
> May I include the story of my Msci. Thesis? ;)
Only if I can include mention of my PhD...
--
John
On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 11:18:14AM +0300, jahonen wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Our institute has about 50 people and we have been seriously
> considering the possibility of making LyX one of our main tools. The
> problem is, however, that we do use Windows NT as the PC OS. The
> LyX-ports which requi
On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 05:06:25PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> Yes, on both counts (smart .layout files and extending LyX's capabilities
> -- think plugins). But someone somewhere is likely to argue that they
> should be able to incorporate such an extension into a document -- or to
> have the ab
On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 08:06:49PM -0500, Dan Mueth wrote:
> The \prime character appears too high if used in the exponent, as one
> would normally do in an equation: $x^\prime = x^2$ produces nice
> postscript output, but looks poor in Lyx. (This is true independent of
> whether one types "\prim
Fred Hucht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thats strange, under 1.0.0 and the actual 1.0.4pl4 I get the right
> result (~ in the .tex file and protected blank in the output).
I think protected blank should be input as CTRL+SPACE rather than ERT...
Regards,
SMiyata
"Arnd Hanses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't it improve readability to use strictly macros like
> GET_CURRENT_DIR, CHANGE_DIR, etc. in C++ class headers and #define them
> with support headers?
We have already discussed this. The readability argument is your
personal preference. While,
"Arnd Hanses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Here's my main interest:
>
> I made NormalizePath() a static function of src/lyx_main.C, as it's
> only used
> there. Am I right, that signal handler call (SIGSEGV in some forked
> child)
> happened before and my patch can't be the reason for the crash?
"Arnd Hanses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure. Perhaps CleanupPath() should better be implemented using nls-safe
> emx lib C string macros internally, only if this not so nice toward
> LString? Or even better make LString clean for Double/triple Byte
> Character Strings?
There are many encodin
On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Nils Jeppe wrote:
> Yes, someone should port LyX to the PalmPilot ;-)
Now _that_ would be cool! (as Mike pulls out his Palm IIIx and prepares to
hit the "HotSync" button ...)
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
10 matches
Mail list logo
