Re: Yet another cryptic error message

1999-10-18 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> Lars> You are now suddenly using a more modern standard library Lars> and | Lars> there "sync" i

Re: Password for cvs?

1999-10-18 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Andre' Poenitz wrote: > > That's what it says on the webpage, but I tried last night and it didn't > > work. > > I had the same problem a couple of days ago. > After I removed ~/.cvspass and the old lyx sources on my harddisk > everything worked fine (don't ask me why, I do

Re: Compile problem in LyX 1.04

1999-10-18 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bruce" == Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bruce> The proper code is attached. A simple use of ${var1:-var2} does Bruce> the trick. LINGUAS is assigned right after the loop anyway, so Bruce> there is no need to assign a value to it as part of the for Bruce> loop. Hmm, a late repl

Re: Compile problem in LyX 1.04

1999-10-18 Thread Bruce Momjian
> > "Bruce" == Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Bruce> The proper code is attached. A simple use of ${var1:-var2} does > Bruce> the trick. LINGUAS is assigned right after the loop anyway, so > Bruce> there is no need to assign a value to it as part of the for > Bruce> loop. > >

Re: Password for cvs?

1999-10-18 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Nils Jeppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Still no luck... | | [root@wasteland lyxcvs]# cvs login | (Logging in to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) | CVS password: | cvs [login aborted]: authorization failed: server anoncvs.lyx.org rejected | access your env? Lgb

Re: Yet another cryptic error message

1999-10-18 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars> MODERN_STL is something I have put in, to my knowledge no | Lars> compilers define it. | | Yes, I understand that. My problem was on the test we should use to | define it. Test if you have to use: pubsync or sync. | Lars, it seems that

Re: RH6.1 TeX breaks lyx?

1999-10-18 Thread Arnd Hanses
On Sun, 17 Oct 1999 16:30:07 -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: >On Sun, Oct 17, 1999 at 11:40:59PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote: >> >> I just updated my base apckages to Redhat 6.1 packages. And now, my lyx is >> hopelessly broken. It looks like the new tetex-* Packages moved around the >> templates/sty

Re: RH6.1 TeX breaks lyx?

1999-10-18 Thread Nils Jeppe
On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: > Then for each package, perform ``rpm -V'' for the package and see > if there are missing files. > You need to make sure that you have tetex, tetex-xdvi, tetex-dvips, > and tetex-latex correctly installed at least. Hmm, you were right. rpm -V showed

Re: RH6.1 TeX breaks lyx?

1999-10-18 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Nils Jeppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I never had any path like that (also not TEXINPUTS or whatever it is | called). If your system is correctly setup you should not need it. Lgb

gettext development?

1999-10-18 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Hello, We are using GNU gettext in the LyX project and have to work around several small problems with the configuration stuff of gettext 0.10.35 on some systems (handling non GNU make in Makefiles and shell oddities in autoconf macros). Currently we use our own modified versions of these files,

Compiling lyxstring.C with cxx -std strict_ansi

1999-10-18 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
I get the following errors/warnings when compiling lyxstring.C with cxx. Most of them (except for the incomplete type stuff) are a bit problematic to me. Anyone cares to enlighten me? mycxx -std strict_ansi -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../lyx-devel/src/support -I../../src -I../../../lyx-devel/sr

Re: gettext development?

1999-10-18 Thread Ulrich Drepper
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So my question is: is gettext development still ongoing? Yes. -- ---. drepper at gnu.org ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \,---' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Cygnus Solutions `--' drepper at c

Re: gettext development?

1999-10-18 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Ulrich" == Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ulrich> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> So my question is: is gettext development still ongoing? Ulrich> Yes. That is very good news... Is there a new release pending? So here are some problems I had with gettext:

Re: RH6.1 TeX breaks lyx?

1999-10-18 Thread Nils Jeppe
Good evening, LyX-Developers. On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Nils Jeppe wrote: > Hmm, you were right. rpm -V showed a huge list of missing files. I've > removed the tetex* packages, and installed them again, that seems to have > solved the missing files problem. I will try tonight after work if this > ha

Indexing

1999-10-18 Thread Garst R. Reese
Always a PITA, but it seems to be an area which could be improved in LyX. In particular, a way of select a phrase, e.g. Chocolate Cookies to be indexed under Cookies. You guessed it, Alice is writing a cookbook. From the docs in Extended, I guess I can do it by opening the Idx box and filling stuf

Paragraph Format buggy with latest lyx-devel?

1999-10-18 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
I could not set a paragraph to "Itemize" in the letter document format using the latest lyx-devel from CVS. Also, the paragraph format did not follow the cursor position correctly. e.g. I click on a "Standard" paragraph (and the format shows Standard). Then I click to the "Closing" and the paragr

Urgent:_Problem_compiling_Lyx

1999-10-18 Thread Anibal J. S. Ferreira
Dear Sirs, I have tried to compile "Lyx" on my Iris Indigo (R3000) running Irix 5.3. Based on the report below, could you please help me or at least indicate how should I ask for help ? Many Thanks. Best regards Anibal Ferreira -- REPORT - gaudio:/usr/local/lyx/lyx-1.0.4

Bug with table dialog in 1.0.4

1999-10-18 Thread Nils Jeppe
By the way, there's a bug in the 1.0.4 LyX. It goes like so: Right-Click on a tabe to bring up the table dialog. Click on "destroy table". Or is it delete? Anyway, that button, yes. Click it again to confirm. The table will be removed, but the dialog window for the table will remain, with a "flic

RE: Bug with table dialog in 1.0.4

1999-10-18 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 18-Oct-99 Nils Jeppe wrote: > > I dunno if this is a known bug (it seems to be too obvious not to be > noticed) but I figure, it can't hurt to send it in. (You won't die because > of the bandwidth this mail will eat up. Right? ;) I did tell that I won't answer any 0.89 problems anymore, but