Re: askForText()

On 21 Dec 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | pairbool, string askForText(string const , string const ); I also prefer the pair version. The pair version it is! I've just committed the changes and it sure makes life a lot better being able to cancel

Compilation failure

Hello again, please add the following lines to 'lyxsum.C': using std::FILE; using std::fopen; using std::fread; using std::fclose; using std::ferror; in lstring.h: using std::size_t; in lyx_gui_misc.h: using std::pair; using std::make_pair; (forgot that line in my previous

Compilation fails

Hello, could anybody please add the following line to 'lyx_gui_misc.h' using std::pair; Many thanks, Michael -- = Michael Schmittphone: +49 451 500 3725 Institute for Telematics

Re: namespaces

On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 11:35:52AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Lars Does namespace support work on all the compilers that the 1.1.x | Lars series currently compiles on? It

Re: Compilers, exceptions, code size, etc. [was: Re: Cannot compile Lyx

On Thu, Dec 23, 1999 at 10:56:46AM +0100, Andre' Poenitz wrote: And could have some more advantages. You could 'register' new functions at run time. You do not need a monolithic 2MB+ binary when you use only 10% of the functionality. Just load 'modules' dynamically on demand... Gawd, I

Re: Compilers, exceptions, code size, etc. [was: Re: Cannot compile Lyx

And could have some more advantages. You could 'register' new functions at run time. You do not need a monolithic 2MB+ binary when you use only 10% of the functionality. Just load 'modules' dynamically on demand... Gawd, I wish I knew how to code that! If I did, I'd contribute

Re: One more lyx-devel on cygnus NT

Lars, I got an email from the cygwin folks the other day saying that regex (the BSD) version is included in cygwin beta 20. I havent found it there though I havent looked very hard, but before you go through all the hussle I would suggest that I try to find out some more about this. Regards

Re: Please help me helping you

So I want to help you. I have started to read the source and, hmm, I got lost. Too many files, I guess. Can you tell me where to look at? What are the ideas behind the code? And how do I get this 'make srcdoc' thing to work? Forget about the make srcdoc. Some of the important files:

More NT fun

Friends, I am trying to find my way through the LyX startup procedure. The overall goal would be to get an NT port that does not need any special startup scripts. So my first step is to try and find out why LyX crashes when it is started from the command line. I've gotten to the point where a

the log file DUUHH

Sorry - I forgot to attache the log file. Time to go home... Here it is. ROland ruebe.log

Re: Compilers, exceptions, code size, etc. [was: Re: Cannot compile Lyx

On 23 Dec 1999 20:22:39 +0100, Lars Gullik Bj°nnes wrote: | | Some time ago I suggested to use 'static inline' to break fn's up. I | think this should work without of introducing fn call overhead. inlining is one of the fings that really slows a compilation... I see... Re-inlining fn's

Re: askForText()

On 21 Dec 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | pair askForText(string const &, string const &); > > I also prefer the pair version. The pair version it is! I've just committed the changes and it sure makes life a lot better being

Compilation failure

Hello again, please add the following lines to 'lyxsum.C': using std::FILE; using std::fopen; using std::fread; using std::fclose; using std::ferror; in lstring.h: using std::size_t; in lyx_gui_misc.h: using std::pair; using std::make_pair; (forgot that line in my previous

Compilation fails

Hello, could anybody please add the following line to 'lyx_gui_misc.h' using std::pair; Many thanks, Michael -- = Michael Schmittphone: +49 451 500 3725 Institute for Telematics

Re: namespaces

On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 11:35:52AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > | Lars> Does namespace support work on all the compilers that the 1.1.x > | Lars> series currently

Re: Compilers, exceptions, code size, etc. [was: Re: Cannot compile Lyx

On Thu, Dec 23, 1999 at 10:56:46AM +0100, Andre' Poenitz wrote: > > And could have some more advantages. You could 'register' new functions > at run time. You do not need a monolithic 2MB+ binary when you > use only 10% of the functionality. > Just load 'modules' dynamically on demand... Gawd,

Re: Compilers, exceptions, code size, etc. [was: Re: Cannot compile Lyx

> > And could have some more advantages. You could 'register' new functions > > at run time. You do not need a monolithic 2MB+ binary when you > > use only 10% of the functionality. > > Just load 'modules' dynamically on demand... > > Gawd, I wish I knew how to code that! If I did, I'd

Re: One more lyx-devel on cygnus NT

Lars, I got an email from the cygwin folks the other day saying that regex (the BSD) version is included in cygwin beta 20. I havent found it there though I havent looked very hard, but before you go through all the hussle I would suggest that I try to find out some more about this. Regards

Re: Please help me helping you

> So I want to help you. I have started to read the source and, hmm, I got > lost. Too many files, I guess. Can you tell me where to look at? What > are the ideas behind the code? And how do I get this 'make srcdoc' thing > to work? Forget about the make srcdoc. Some of the important files:

More NT fun

Friends, I am trying to find my way through the LyX startup procedure. The overall goal would be to get an NT port that does not need any special startup scripts. So my first step is to try and find out why LyX crashes when it is started from the command line. I've gotten to the point where a

the log file DUUHH

Sorry - I forgot to attache the log file. Time to go home... Here it is. ROland ruebe.log

Re: Compilers, exceptions, code size, etc. [was: Re: Cannot compile Lyx

On 23 Dec 1999 20:22:39 +0100, Lars Gullik Bj°nnes wrote: >| >| Some time ago I suggested to use 'static inline' to break fn's up. I >| think this should work without of introducing fn call overhead. > >inlining is one of the fings that really slows a compilation... I see... Re-inlining fn's