On Sunday 09 June 2002 3:21 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Incidentally, to bore you with more stats about bloat.
> |
> I do not understand what the difference in the versions here?
> (1.2.X vs. 1.2.0CVS?) (but I can guess)
>
> anyway... Intersting... so this CXX is _really_ bad at a lot of
>
Juergen Spitzmueller writes:
>
> R. Lahaye wrote:
> > Hmmm, if LyX by its own is able to decide whether it needs natbib, then why
> > do we need a manual checkbox for "use natbib"? Why not using natbib
> > automagically when needed?
>
> And how should LyX decide this?
Don't know, but Angus wrote
R. Lahaye wrote:
> Juergen Spitzmueller writes:
> > And how should LyX decide this?
>
> Don't know, but Angus wrote in
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel%40lists.lyx.org/msg39253.html :
>
> "It is intended in that we call InsetCitation::validate to ascertain
>whether we need a \usepacka
On Monday 10 June 2002 9:40 am, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Juergen Spitzmueller writes:
> > R. Lahaye wrote:
> > > Hmmm, if LyX by its own is able to decide whether it needs natbib, then
> > > why do we need a manual checkbox for "use natbib"? Why not using natbib
> > > automagically when needed?
> >
> >
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Please review and apply. Angus
When you are confident that it compiles with newer gcc, feel free to
apply it to 1.2.x.
JMarc
Hi,
Some stupid spammer or a bot seems to impersonate list posters domains. AARGH.
Cheers, Kuba Ober
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Angus> Please review and apply. Angus
>
| When you are confident that it compiles with newer gcc, feel free to
| apply it to 1.2.x.
It doesn't, because gcc 3.1 do only put those symbo
latest cvs
Herbert
Configuration
Host type: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Special build flags:warnings assertions
C Compiler: gcc
C Compiler flags: -g -O2
C++ Compiler: g++ (2.95.3)
C++ Compiler flags:
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Lars> | Angus> Please review and apply. Angus
>>
Lars> | When you are confident that it compiles with newer gcc, f
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| latest cvs
>
| Herbert
>
>
| Configuration
|Host type: i686-pc-linux-gnu
|Special build flags:warnings assertions
|C Compiler: gcc
|C Compiler flags: -g -O2
|C++ Compi
On 10-Jun-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Are you sure you do not need a clean build?
>
> When did this error emerge?
> Have you compiled 1.3.0cvs successfully earlier?
Well I get
/data/soft/lyx/lyx-devel/src/frontends/controllers/ControlDialog_impl.C:21:
undefined reference to `ControlButt
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 10-Jun-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Are you sure you do not need a clean build?
>>
>> When did this error emerge?
>> Have you compiled 1.3.0cvs successfully earlier?
>
| Well I get
>
| /data/soft/lyx/lyx-devel/src/frontends/controllers/Contr
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | latest cvs
>
> | Herbert
>
>>
> | Configuration
> |Host type: i686-pc-linux-gnu
> |Special build flags:warnings assertions
> |C Compiler: gcc
> |C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| | On 10-Jun-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>>> Are you sure you do not need a clean build?
>>>
>>> When did this error emerge?
>>> Have you compiled 1.3.0cvs successfully earlier?
>>
| | Well I ge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Well... actually I see those errors, but I didn't a couple of days
| ago... so what happened to this code?
| [investigating]
+2002-06-07 Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ Fixes needed to compile with Compaq cxx 6.5.
+ * ControlD
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
> | Well... actually I see those errors, but I didn't a couple of days
> | ago... so what happened to this code?
> | [investigating]
>
> +2002-06-07 Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> +
> + Fixes needed to c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
| | Well... actually I see those errors, but I didn't a couple of days
| | ago... so what happened to this code?
| | [investigating]
>
| +2002-06-07 Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| +
| +
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>> | Well... actually I see those errors, but I didn't a couple of days
>> | ago... so what happened to this code?
>> | [investigating]
>> +2002-06-07 Angus Leeming <[EMAIL
Matthieu Amiguet wrote:
>>convert it again by hand with depth -8 and
>>try to insert this moebius.xpm as a graphic.
>>
>
> "convert -depth 8 mobius.eps mobius.xpm" gives the attached file, and if I
> inlcude it in lyx, I get the same error as usual (error scaling etc.)
the patch fixes another
<>
Hi,
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> this is from graphicx.sty
>
> \define@key{Gin}{origin}[c]{%
>\def\Gin@erotate{\Grot@box@kv[origin=#1]}}
>
> which means, that the default is origin=c. Why should there be a
> difference when running without this option?
>
This just means t
KDozer wrote:
> if (!params().rotateOrigin.empty()) {
> options << " origin=" << params().rotateOrigin[0];
>
> if rotateOrigin="" then the latex code is
>
> includegraphics[]
>
> which is treated differently by graphicx.sty
yes, you're right. Sorry ...
but we can handle this in an
I recently test the new version 1.2 of LyX. The work done by the
developers is impresive. But I encountred the following problem.
I wrote some document class for LyX containing many layouts with
preambles. In the previous version of LyX those preambles where send to
the TeX file in the order they
Please commit attached update ru.po in CVS (and head branch too).
--
Lav
GNU! ALT Linux! LaTeX! LyX!
ru.po.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
I have added some self recompiled lyx-1.2.0 rpms for SuSE-8.0 (i386) to
ftp.lyx.org/incoming.
They are based on the work of Mr. Sylvan. I only modified the dependencies
to fit the SuSE naming conventions and recompiled on an updated SuSE
system.
Can someone move them to the bin directory, ple
I hope that the bloat is more acceptable to gcc 2.96 users now.
With GCC 3.1 it seems better than ever:
textdata bss dec hex filename
2804979 112728 48684 2966391 2d4377 src/lyx
2800035 112760 49612 2962407 2d33e7 src/lyx (after some dialog/gui changes)
This patch sho
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 12:57:38PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> could someone consider this one?
Any reason you've got srcdoc comments in ControlParagraph.C
as well as .h ? Also some normal comments have the srcdoc
"///" prefix.
I'm building with it now. If you send a patch with ChangeLogs,
I'l
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 12:50:15AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> - boost::function showPreferences;
> + boost::function0 showPreferences;
Why are these changes made ? Reduce slowness of template deduction or
something ?
> +extern "C" {
> +
> + void gui_ShowAboutlyx(LyXView &,
Does this really provide a worthwhile speed increase ?
Or does it make some mysterious behaviour difference for non-bidi
documents ?
regards
john
--
"I continue to be amazed at what Andrei can make templates do. Some of it
still makes my head hurt."
- Herb Sutter
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
> but we can handle this in an easier way, because the
> default (the Reference Point) is not cc (center)
> but lB (leftBaseline)
ok, I see, I guess setting the default value to lB should have the same
effect. I still prefer my patch, as it minimizes the
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 08:32:42AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Does somebody knows why
>
> convert file.epsi file
With what file ? A random .epsi I found on the web works fine for
me
Version: @(#)ImageMagick 5.4.4 04/05/02 Q:16 http://www.imagemagick.org
I can apply this patch to work ar
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 12:07:19PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> It's broken for me because you don't include lib jpeg in the
> John> libs when testing flimage, so the link fails. Obviously you
> John> can't just include it unconditionally, because that will break
> John> the link fo
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 12:50:15AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> -boost::function showPreferences;
>> +boost::function0 showPreferences;
>
| Why are these changes made ? Reduce slowness of template deduction or
| something ?
Yes, does not
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Does this really provide a worthwhile speed increase ?
>
| Or does it make some mysterious behaviour difference for non-bidi
| documents ?
Hu?
It is there just to be able to turn off bidi, then imho it should be
removed. Less special cases and behaviour
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 01:24:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | I've tried hard, but I'm at a loss to work out why these aren't
> | in a namespace instead. It might do something about the butt-ugly
> | names too ...
>
> How does extern "C" and namespaces mix?
> Remember that this has to
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 01:30:19AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Hu?
>
> It is there just to be able to turn off bidi, then imho it should be
> removed. Less special cases and behaviour changing with different
> parameters turned on/off.
Exactly. So you would be happy to see it excised ?
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 01:24:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> | I've tried hard, but I'm at a loss to work out why these aren't
>> | in a namespace instead. It might do something about the butt-ugly
>> | names too ...
>>
>> How does extern "C"
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 01:30:19AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Hu?
>>
>> It is there just to be able to turn off bidi, then imho it should be
>> removed. Less special cases and behaviour changing with different
>> parameters turned on/off.
>
|
John Keane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>> but we can handle this in an easier way, because the
>> default (the Reference Point) is not cc (center)
>> but lB (leftBaseline)
>
| ok, I see, I guess setting the default value to lB should have the same
| ef
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 01:53:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Hu? Champions League, UEFA cup, and Premier League?
More like gutbuster I think..
> What? Now you completely lost me...
> (or are you just mixing discussions again, stay on topic please)
bah
> The requires a pretty smart l
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 02:43:23PM -0300, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> I have a lazy man request. It would be nice if in the next versions of
> lyx (or even in some fix for 1.2) the math panel don't get keyboard
> focus. This way, I could edit an equation using both the keyboard and
> the m
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The requires a pretty smart linker, I am not sure if all systems have
>> that. How can the preferred gui then be placed in lyxrc?
>
| why do we want to do that ? I don't understand the point, and I do
| understand how ugly this code is going to look.
I d
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 02:23:20AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | understand how ugly this code is going to look.
>
> I do not belive that it is going to be ugly at all.
You may be right, I wouldn't know.
> | Well this is evidently not true.
>
> Well... if the comitter cannot take crit
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
> | Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> | | On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Allan Rae wrote:
[...]
> InsetIterator is use twice...
>
> the use in buffer.C:3972 will work fine with >= (even better probab
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Oh come on, this is bull and you know it. I've taken criticism head on,
| changed stuff where I've agreed with you and even when I've not, when
| there's no major loss of readability. I am not afraid of criticism, I'm
| not afraid of being called on lousy
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 02:42:46AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> (besides being swamped in RL work... I have decided that I do not like
> ~100 hours weeks a lot)
It is fine to say when you're too busy, you know. Remember I can't tell
the difference between you being overloaded and you just
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 02:42:46AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[...]
> > (gold fish)
>
> See Allan the developers are as bad as the users :)
And you'll notice that the bugzilla quote says:
Gold fish are users too.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 01:25:09PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > See Allan the developers are as bad as the users :)
>
> And you'll notice that the bugzilla quote says:
> Gold fish are users too.
> ^^^
Heh :)
It doesn't say "Users are goldfish too", does it ?
T
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 01:22:35AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> I don't know what you mean exactly. Are you using a window manager that
> has "click to focus window" ?
Yes, I'm using "click to focus". I'm sorry. My question makes sense only with
this information. I regard "click to focus" the most
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 01:22:35AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > I don't know what you mean exactly. Are you using a window manager that
> > has "click to focus window" ?
>
> Yes, I'm using "click to focus". I'm sorry. My question makes sense
> only with this informati
50 matches
Mail list logo
