On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 02:02:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Attached a screenshot from the branch list editor I am building, with
> | a separate branches tab. Lars, was this about what you had in mind?
> |
> | Not yet working,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 10:12:26AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I *had* a vector there... but the remove_if seemed to require a list
> (is that correct? gcc 2.95.2.)
Grr. Yes. list::remove_if uses a list, the 'global' one not.
Sorry for confusing you.
> > Likewise the global helper 'class match
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 08:15:53AM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 02:04:11AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjxnnes wrote:
> > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | As I will be off to the country again tomorrow, someone else may check
> > | this in if it can go
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 02:04:11AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | As I will be off to the country again tomorrow, someone else may check
> | this in if it can go like this. Otherwise until next week :-)
>
> I'd like next week then. Just so th
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 01:58:41AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I am actually less concerned if it is your work that has created this,
> IMHO it would be worse if it was the rowlist, parlist or the signals
> work.
It looks like my stuff afterall.
> But of course if you can find out _why_ (
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Not yet working, but getting there :-)
>
> yes, getting there...
>
> I wonder ... could this be one of those dialogs that could benefit
> from a
>
> --- ---
> | | | |
> | | add-> | |
> | | <-remove|
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars, you have posted the following warning in
| controllers/ControlMath.C:
|
| string const find_xpm(string const & name)
| {
| #warning Use a static table for this (Lgb)
| // And get O(log n) lookup (Lgb)
|
| string xpm_name = subst(
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 02:02:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> I wonder ... could this be one of those dialogs that could benefit
> from a
>
> --- ---
> | | | |
> | | add-> | |
> | | <-remove| |
> | |
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Compiling 1.3.x I get these warnings when compiling the
| boost regex library. (gcc 3.3)
and if you look further you will find some in the math_parser.C as
well...
| Lars, are the boost developers interested in such things?
| If so could you pass the
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| As I will be off to the country again tomorrow, someone else may check
| this in if it can go like this. Otherwise until next week :-)
I'd like next week then. Just so that we can decide a bit on further
refinements and requirements before we add the
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Attached a screenshot from the branch list editor I am building, with
| a separate branches tab. Lars, was this about what you had in mind?
|
| Not yet working, but getting there :-)
yes, getting there...
I wonder ... could this be one of those dial
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 05:12:43PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | but to be honest, I think this is a
| > | waste of time.
| >
| > That depends on where the error comes from.
|
| Between 5 and 6 days ago. diff attached.
| Mostly Alfredos signa
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 08:05:15PM +0300, Martin Vermeer spake thusly:
>
> Attached a screenshot from the branch list editor I am building, with
> a separate branches tab. Lars, was this about what you had in mind?
>
> Not yet working, but getting there :-)
>
> Martin
Here is the 'branch' code
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I just noticed that this kind of cursor movement has already been
> present yesterday, so the current regression is performance only.
I've added a bug to bugzilla yersterday, mostly the same but with
LFUN_LEFTSEL inside table cells. LFUN_RIGHTSEL works ok. Doesn't this mean
John Levon wrote:
> > OK to apply?
>
> Looks good to me
Applied.
Juergen.
John Levon wrote:
> Annoying the user is never a good solution.
>
> I really think we have it right as is.
>
The only thing I would even think of changing is making the color change
a document item rather than a global preference, but default the same as
is.
Garst
Attached a screenshot from the branch list editor I am building, with
a separate branches tab. Lars, was this about what you had in mind?
Not yet working, but getting there :-)
Martin
<>
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 05:47:08PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 05:12:43PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > | but to be honest, I think this is a
> > | waste of time.
> >
> > That depends on where the error comes from.
>
> Between 5 and 6 days ago. diff attached.
>
Lars, you have posted the following warning in
controllers/ControlMath.C:
string const find_xpm(string const & name)
{
#warning Use a static table for this (Lgb)
// And get O(log n) lookup (Lgb)
string xpm_name = subst(name, ' ', '_');
if (xpm_name == "(") xpm_name = "lpa
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 05:12:43PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | but to be honest, I think this is a
> | waste of time.
>
> That depends on where the error comes from.
Between 5 and 6 days ago. diff attached.
Mostly Alfredos signals and my multiple LyXTexts per InsetText stuff.
Maybe tim
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 03:01:23PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Looks like it's time for a decision. Ignore that or try to fix tabular
> "first"?
As expected there are lots of mysterious regressions currently. So you
may as well carry on with the extended work of removing update() IMHO.
regards
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:26:12PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:44:53PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > I think so.
>
> There's a tex2lyx component assigned to you now
Ok.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 03:39:00PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I have just trawled through the 700+ messages on the devel list
> posted since I last looked in this direction. It seems that there
Whoo hoo ! Welcome back ;)
john
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:01:58PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> (qtabular width input)
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1156
>
> OK to apply?
Looks good to me
regards
john
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:41:35PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> For my part, I won't type long sermons in an web
> frontend as long as this is not as comfortable as
> email or such.
Then use the email interface ...
john
Compiling 1.3.x I get these warnings when compiling the
boost regex library. (gcc 3.3)
Lars, are the boost developers interested in such things?
If so could you pass them on?
File ../../../../../boost/libs/regex/src/c_regex_traits.cpp
../../../../../boost/libs/regex/src/cpp_regex_traits.cpp: In
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:44:53PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I think so.
There's a tex2lyx component assigned to you now
john
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 05:12:43PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:53:07PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > I'd really like to know when the regression was introduced first.
> | > Just to pause until we find out.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:43:58AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> [The only problem that might have cropped up would be speed but I simply
> don't see it. So this is either premature optimization or some
> optimization that's no more relevant on a PIII/667]
Probably a selection of other changes ov
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:08:12PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> How about allowing the user to choose in the preferences dialog whether the
> language should be changed on paste (but only between dialects of the same
> language) ?
Bleh. Remember the mantra: a pref means that we've run out of design
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Depends... if we understand why the regressions is there or not...
>
My experience with marking tabular has been a bit weird. Sometimes it is
very slow, others not, and I can't determine what I may be doing
different! It would look like a regression -- then I would r
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:53:07PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > I'd really like to know when the regression was introduced first.
| > Just to pause until we find out.
|
| I am building now '1 week ago',
I am doing 2003-07-01 and 2003-06-01
|
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:53:07PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I'd really like to know when the regression was introduced first.
> Just to pause until we find out.
I am building now '1 week ago', but to be honest, I think this is a
waste of time.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Fr
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Hello all,
> |
> | $ gcc --version
> | gcc (GCC) 3.3.1 20030626 (Debian prerelease)
> |
> | I find many warning messages like
>
> Many? That was an understatement... thousands upon thousands you
> mean... (at least wi
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:53:07PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I'd really like to know when the regression was introduced first.
>
> Just to pause until we find out.
Hm... ok.
> We can divede the binary search between us to make it faster, just
> tell me the dates to check for (or the in
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| So given that this is an "old" bug, ok to proceed with the
| redraw/update changes?
I'd really like to know when the regression was introduced first.
Just to pause until we find out.
We can divede the binary search between us to make it faster, just
t
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hello all,
|
| $ gcc --version
| gcc (GCC) 3.3.1 20030626 (Debian prerelease)
|
| I find many warning messages like
Many? That was an understatement... thousands upon thousands you
mean... (at least with gcc 3.4)
| ../../../../../boost/libs/regex/sr
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:34:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 03:01:23PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> | >
> | > This moves closer towards full redraw but there are regressions:
> | > Selection in tables gets slow a
Hello all,
I have just trawled through the 700+ messages on the devel list
posted since I last looked in this direction. It seems that there
have been some impassioned discussions as well as the more standard
fare. It all makes intersting reading ;-)
More prosaically, I have just tried to comp
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 03:01:23PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
| >
| > This moves closer towards full redraw but there are regressions:
| > Selection in tables gets slow and when selecting bottom up, the
| > selection anchor "moves" in parallel to the
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 03:01:23PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
>
> This moves closer towards full redraw but there are regressions:
> Selection in tables gets slow and when selecting bottom up, the
> selection anchor "moves" in parallel to the cursor.
I just noticed that this kind of cursor move
(qtabular width input)
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1156
OK to apply?
Juergen.
Index: src/frontends/qt2/QTabular.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/frontends/qt2/QTabular.C,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:08:12PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> How about allowing the user to choose in the preferences dialog whether the
> language should be changed on paste (but only between dialects of the same
> language) ?
Against.
We can not have a preference for everything everytime we ca
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 12:39:48AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> >, it is desired that LyX should automatically change the language of
> > the copied text to American, and then the user should fix the spelling.
>
> And what if it's *not* intended to be a single-language document ? You
> just broke
This moves closer towards full redraw but there are regressions:
Selection in tables gets slow and when selecting bottom up, the
selection anchor "moves" in parallel to the cursor.
Nested minipages, however, work just fine "at full speed", so this does
not look like a problem of 'full redraw' and
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 03:48:41PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> using std::vector;
> using std::bind2nd;
> using std::remove_if;
You want list::remove_if, not the general one.
> void BranchList::remove(string const & s)
> {
> remove_if(list.begin(), list.end(), bind2nd(pfn(), s));
> }
v
So who's actually coming?
So far I expect Alfredo(2), Angus, Asger, Jean-Marc, Jose' and Lars.
Not coming are Juergen and John(?).
Asger (Wed-Sun) and Jean-Marc (Thu-Tue) already sent details
concerning flights/trains.
Anything wrong with that lists?
[I'd like send out address etc by private
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:18:47AM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
...
> Theoretically, I'd expect this to be undefined behaviour as 'it' is
> invalid after its 'pointee' is erased.
>
> Practically, there is a std::list<>::remove_if(Pred) somewhere.
>
> Andre'
Thanks! Ok, see attached, whi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 15.07.2003, 13:20:37:
| > On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:12:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| > > PS: If you do not want me to fill bugzilla with
| > > tex2lyx reports, please shout loudly.
| >
| > No, that's fine. My 'in
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:41:56PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | [But certainly less often than on lyx-devel...]
>
> So, perhaps even if you do not check that often, tex2lyx bugs should
> be default assigned to you?
I think so.
Unless somebody thinks that Jean-Marc is more likely to fix
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:13:41PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | Now why are tex2lyx bugs assigned to Jean-Marc?
| >
| > he is default... and you have paid no interest in bugzilla.
|
| Well, I look from time to time
|
| [But certainly le
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:26:02PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:12:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > PS: If you do not want me to fill bugzilla with
> > > tex2lyx reports, please shout loudly.
> >
> > No, that's fine. My 'inbox based bugzilla substitute'
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 15.07.2003, 13:20:37:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:12:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > PS: If you do not want me to fill bugzilla with
> > tex2lyx reports, please shout loudly.
>
> No, that's fine. My 'inbox based bugzilla substitute' is far le
As LyXText::refresh_row was only used by REFRESH_ROW (now merged into
REFRESH_AREA), the variable and the surrounding logig can go...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:12:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> PS: If you do not want me to fill bugzilla with
> tex2lyx reports, please shout loudly.
No, that's fine. My 'inbox based bugzilla substitute' is far less
reliable (but more convenient...)
> I am not looking for tex2lyx bugs dire
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:13:41PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Now why are tex2lyx bugs assigned to Jean-Marc?
>
> he is default... and you have paid no interest in bugzilla.
Well, I look from time to time
[But certainly less often than on lyx-devel...]
Andre'
--
Those who desir
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 15.07.2003, 13:06:27:
> Now why are tex2lyx bugs assigned to Jean-Marc?
Because there is no component "tex2lyx" right now.
I used "general" for the classification of the
bug reports. I informed John about the problem
already.
Michael
PS: If you do
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:02:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| >
| > Weitergeleitete Nachricht von [EMAIL PROTECTED] vom 15.07.2003,
| > 12:58:07:
| > > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1261
| > >
| > >Summary: tex2lyx adds spa
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:07:07PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | void LyXText::clearPaint()
> | {
> | - refresh_status_ = REFRESH_NONE;
> | + need_refresh_ = true;
> | refresh_row = rows().end();
> | refresh_y = 0;
> | }
>
> Is this correct?
No.
> Shouldn't it be false?
Y
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Index: text2.C
| ===
| RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/text2.C,v
| retrieving revision 1.384
| diff -u -p -r1.384 text2.C
| --- text2.C 15 Jul 2003 08:26:16 - 1.384
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 01:02:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Weitergeleitete Nachricht von [EMAIL PROTECTED] vom 15.07.2003,
> 12:58:07:
> > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1261
> >
> >Summary: tex2lyx adds space around itemize items
> >Product: LyX
> >
Weitergeleitete Nachricht von [EMAIL PROTECTED] vom 15.07.2003,
12:58:07:
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1261
>
>Summary: tex2lyx adds space around itemize items
>Product: LyX
>Version: 1.4.0cvs
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
>
This replaces the refresh_status tristate by a 'bool need_refresh_'
[Which will go in the end entirely...]
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
Index: lyxtext.h
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:38:54AM +0200, Braunstein Alfredo wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > The attached patch collapses 'REFRESH_AREA' and 'REFRESH_ROW' handling.
> > Goal is still simple two-phase drawing with 'redraw everything'.
> >
> > I don't see any noticable sluggishness when jumping
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The attached patch collapses 'REFRESH_AREA' and 'REFRESH_ROW' handling.
> Goal is still simple two-phase drawing with 'redraw everything'.
>
> I don't see any noticable sluggishness when jumping around in the
> UserGuide (was to be expected I think)
>
> Incidentally, this
The attached patch collapses 'REFRESH_AREA' and 'REFRESH_ROW' handling.
Goal is still simple two-phase drawing with 'redraw everything'.
I don't see any noticable sluggishness when jumping around in the
UserGuide (was to be expected I think)
Incidentally, this fixes the redraw bug when clicking
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 10:05:51PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
| > void BranchList::remove(string const & s)
| > {
| > List::iterator it = list.begin();
| > List::iterator end = list.end();
| > for (; it != end; it++) {
| > if (i
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 12:39:48AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> I do not see a way we can change language behind the user's back in a
> reliable manner, and I don't think we should.
I agree with John. A Russian word does not magically convert to
Chinese just because it is pasted in a Chinese documen
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 07:58:53AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I think there are a few places in InsetText that are never reached.
> | Should I put in a lyxerr<< or an Assert or ...?
> |
> |
> | I.e.
>
> I think Assert.
>
> perhaps we sh
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 10:05:51PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> void BranchList::remove(string const & s)
> {
> List::iterator it = list.begin();
> List::iterator end = list.end();
> for (; it != end; it++) {
> if (it->getBranch() == s) list.erase(it);
> }
>
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 09:01:52PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Effectively, it seems there's no need for a difference. The attached patch
> seems to work fine (will test it a little more though).
Good boy ;-)
Just commit if you are finished with testing.
Andre', wondering whether the sky
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 08:39:28PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> > This would be it. Works very well in text3.C (normal text) and insettext
> > (tested inside footnotes, minipages).
>
> OK to apply?
I think so.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 09:52:12PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> int i = 0;
> if (pt == "Comment") os << "%\n\\begin{comment}\n"; // remember to validate
> - if (pt == "Greyedout") os << "%\n\\textcolor[gray]{0.8}{";
> + if (pt == "Greyedout") os << "%\n\\color[gray]{0.8}";
Be
73 matches
Mail list logo
