On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 02:34:51PM +0200, j.heidemeier wrote:
O.K I didn't explain it cleary enough. I didn't want to withdraw the existence
of floating objects in lyx - I wanted to change the perspective how they
were exposed to the authors - they should stay but they should be viewed as
Helge Hafting schrieb:
You have a point. Note that the people here can change lyx but
not latex, and part of the problem here is how latex works.
no, the point is in which way LyX should support LaTeX
packages, should it be for 100% or is a minimal support
better than no support.
LyX supports
Anyone have any suggestions for how to fix this here?
- Forwarded message from Kayvan A. Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 22:20:26 -0700
From: Kayvan A. Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LyX Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: lyx-1.3.x compile failure
User-Agent:
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
Anyone have any suggestions for how to fix this here?
None, but I would like to remind you about Ling Li's 17 September email
Separate LyX RPMs and lyx-select.sh
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel:28064
We have decided in the past that this is exactly
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 09:58:50PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
Anyone have any suggestions for how to fix this here?
None, but I would like to remind you about Ling Li's 17 September email
Separate LyX RPMs and lyx-select.sh
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 05:22:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 05:14:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
No. Not unless the rest of you is ok with that. what I am saying is
that we should not cater for 2.96. (If you
Hi folks,
I handed my thesis in to the Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of
Calgary. It was 230 pages and LyX handled every one of them with ease.
See the new LyX Wiki ProducedPublications page for details and a
reference.
Thanks to the developers, and everyone on the lists who
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 02:34:51PM +0200, j.heidemeier wrote:
> O.K I didn't explain it cleary enough. I didn't want to withdraw the existence
> of "floating objects" in lyx - I wanted to change the perspective how they
> were exposed to the authors - they should stay but they should be viewed
Helge Hafting schrieb:
You have a point. Note that the people here can change lyx but
not latex, and part of the problem here is how latex works.
no, the point is in which way LyX should support LaTeX
packages, should it be for 100% or is a minimal support
better than no support.
LyX supports
Anyone have any suggestions for how to fix this here?
- Forwarded message from "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 22:20:26 -0700
From: "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LyX Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lyx-1.3.x compile failure
User-Agent:
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> Anyone have any suggestions for how to fix this here?
None, but I would like to remind you about Ling Li's 17 September email
"Separate LyX RPMs and lyx-select.sh"
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel:28064
We have decided in the past that this is
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 09:58:50PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
>
> > Anyone have any suggestions for how to fix this here?
>
> None, but I would like to remind you about Ling Li's 17 September email
> "Separate LyX RPMs and lyx-select.sh"
>
>
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 05:22:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 05:14:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> >
> >> No. Not unless the rest of you is ok with that. what I am saying is
> >> that we should not cater for
Hi folks,
I handed my thesis in to the Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of
Calgary. It was 230 pages and LyX handled every one of them with ease.
See the new LyX Wiki "ProducedPublications" page for details and a
reference.
Thanks to the developers, and everyone on the lists who
14 matches
Mail list logo
