On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 05:22:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 05:14:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > > > >> No. Not unless the rest of you is ok with that. what I am saying is > >> that we should not cater for 2.96. (If you still want to support 2.95 > >> I'll go along with that.) > > > | Are you saying that the problem occurs with 2.96 but not 2.95 or 3.x ? > | That would seem quite odd. > > No, I am not saying that either. > > >> More up to you than me... > > > | I don't think we should land anybody in it ... look what most FreeBSD > | installs are still using for example > > One of the resons why I am not pushing gcc 3.x harder.
I give up. I have now upgraded my RPM build machine's compiler to gcc-3.2. This is a redhat-6.0(!!!) system. It needed a plethora of other libraries, but it worked without a major redhat release upgrade. I was able to run the same binary on a redhat-6.1 system by installing some of the files in the ftp://ftp.sylvan.com/pub/lyx/devel/SYSTEM directory. Best regards, ---Kayvan -- Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids: Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura Isabella Sylvan | Katherine Yelena (8/8/89) http://sylvan.com/~kayvan | "crown of her husband" | Robin Gregory (2/28/92)
