Hi Jean-Marc!
John There's no clear date.
John (Personal opinion: xmas is hopeful)
Note that there will be at least one 1.3.x version until then.
JMarc
Does that mean you actually think about a future 1.3.6 version?
Personally, I think we should finish 1.3.5 and then fully concentrate on
1.4.0.
LyX CVS as on the development branch (HEAD) is now entering _hard_
feature freeze mode.
If it is not a (crashing) bug or a regression you are not supposed to
work on it.
If possible I'd like all bugzilla bugs to loose the target version if
the case is not a (crashing) bug or a regression.
Hello,
has anybody produced some Win32 binaries for LyX 1.4.0cvs or 1.3.4/1.3.5cvs?
I noticed that many patches concerning the Win32 platform have been
committed recently. so I guess that someone must actually work on this
platform.
Since Ruurd's latest version is 1.3.3 and I don't have to
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I have successfully used tex2lyx to convert a big document (~230 pages, lots
of formulas and figures, edited by several authors with very different
latex knowledge) last month. I found and fixed some bugs during this
process (also the environment nesting bug that was
Hello,
I noticed a discussion on subversion recently. Here are my two cents:
Subversion is a great tool. Full stop. I have used it for about 1 1/2
years and I never encountered a data loss or something similar.
I set up a subversion server (based on an old Pentium II machine with
W2K Pro and
| I have successfully used tex2lyx to convert a big document (~230 pages, lots
| of formulas and figures, edited by several authors with very different
| latex knowledge) last month. I found and fixed some bugs during this
| process (also the environment nesting bug that was the only remaining one
Michael Schmitt wrote:
LyX CVS as on the development branch (HEAD) is now entering _hard_
feature freeze mode.
If it is not a (crashing) bug or a regression you are not supposed
to work on it.
If possible I'd like all bugzilla bugs to loose the target version
if the case is not a
Michael Schmitt wrote:
Hello,
has anybody produced some Win32 binaries for LyX 1.4.0cvs or
1.3.4/1.3.5cvs?
Nope. In addition, the forked process code is totally broken on Win32.
I'm thinking about how best to proceed.
I noticed that many patches concerning the Win32 platform have been
On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 12:32:09PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Michael Schmitt wrote:
Hello,
has anybody produced some Win32 binaries for LyX 1.4.0cvs or
1.3.4/1.3.5cvs?
Nope. In addition, the forked process code is totally broken on Win32.
I'm thinking about how best to proceed.
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
has anybody produced some Win32 binaries for LyX 1.4.0cvs or
1.3.4/1.3.5cvs?
Nope. In addition, the forked process code is totally broken on
Win32. I'm thinking about how best to proceed.
[...snip...]
Lyx is completely working on Win32 with Cygwin. I compile it
Hi Jean-Marc!
John> There's no clear date.
John> (Personal opinion: xmas is hopeful)
Note that there will be at least one 1.3.x version until then.
JMarc
Does that mean you actually think about a future 1.3.6 version?
Personally, I think we should finish 1.3.5 and then fully concentrate on
LyX CVS as on the development branch (HEAD) is now entering _hard_
feature freeze mode.
If it is not a (crashing) bug or a regression you are not supposed to
work on it.
If possible I'd like all bugzilla bugs to loose the target version if
the case is not a (crashing) bug or a regression.
Hello,
has anybody produced some Win32 binaries for LyX 1.4.0cvs or 1.3.4/1.3.5cvs?
I noticed that many patches concerning the Win32 platform have been
committed recently. so I guess that someone must actually work on this
platform.
Since Ruurd's latest version is 1.3.3 and I don't have to
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I have successfully used tex2lyx to convert a big document (~230 pages, lots
of formulas and figures, edited by several authors with very different
latex knowledge) last month. I found and fixed some bugs during this
process (also the environment nesting bug that was
Hello,
I noticed a discussion on subversion recently. Here are my two cents:
Subversion is a great tool. Full stop. I have used it for about 1 1/2
years and I never encountered a data loss or something similar.
I set up a subversion server (based on an old Pentium II machine with
W2K Pro and
| I have successfully used tex2lyx to convert a big document (~230 pages, lots
| of formulas and figures, edited by several authors with very different
| latex knowledge) last month. I found and fixed some bugs during this
| process (also the environment nesting bug that was the only remaining one
Michael Schmitt wrote:
>> LyX CVS as on the development branch (HEAD) is now entering _hard_
>> feature freeze mode.
>>
>> If it is not a (crashing) bug or a regression you are not supposed
>> to work on it.
>>
>> If possible I'd like all bugzilla bugs to loose the target version
>> if the case
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> has anybody produced some Win32 binaries for LyX 1.4.0cvs or
> 1.3.4/1.3.5cvs?
Nope. In addition, the forked process code is totally broken on Win32.
I'm thinking about how best to proceed.
> I noticed that many patches concerning the Win32 platform have
On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 12:32:09PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Michael Schmitt wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > has anybody produced some Win32 binaries for LyX 1.4.0cvs or
> > 1.3.4/1.3.5cvs?
>
> Nope. In addition, the forked process code is totally broken on Win32.
> I'm thinking about how best
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
>> > has anybody produced some Win32 binaries for LyX 1.4.0cvs or
>> > 1.3.4/1.3.5cvs?
>>
>> Nope. In addition, the forked process code is totally broken on
>> Win32. I'm thinking about how best to proceed.
[...snip...]
> Lyx is completely working on Win32 with Cygwin. I
20 matches
Mail list logo
