Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 11:57:47AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
I expect this would work fine if we could, in coordcache, turn bool
updating into int updating, counting the number of screen redraws we
have pending.
Best thing I can think of right now is some 'dispatch queue'
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:58:34PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
Well, the files are in the way... :-)
Either you have removed the CVS subdirectory or you work on a Windows
machine and you have changed the file names from lower to upper case or
vice versa...
No Windows, and I haven't
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:43:45PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:28:47PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 03:59:47PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
But there is no graphics or the like within a mile.
It is _typing characters_ that does this. Does
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:43:45PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:28:47PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 03:59:47PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
But there is no graphics or the like within a mile.
It is _typing characters_ that does this. Does
And the patch...
Index: BufferView_pimpl.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/BufferView_pimpl.C,v
retrieving revision 1.581
diff -u -p -r1.581 BufferView_pimpl.C
--- BufferView_pimpl.C 20 Apr 2005 17:35:46 -
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:23:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Urs. Doesn't cmd[-1] mean cmd[cmd.length()-2]. Some nasty c-ism?
Only for cmd.lenght() == -1.
I think you should redo your math ;-P
Alfredo
Andre Poenitz wrote:
PS: If Alfredo doesn't shout within a few hours that he'll give it a try
I'd try to convince the family that this is important...
Haha
Good luck with that ;-)
Alfredo
Hello
the menu entry NavigateRefs in LyX 1.3 is misleading, because the
user expects to navigate to the next reference in the document. Instead,
Refs lets the user jump from a reference to its corresponding label.
(Actually, I thought the function is broken until I found out its real
purpose)
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:43:45PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:28:47PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 03:59:47PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
But there is no graphics or the like within a mile.
It is _typing characters_ that does this. Does
Rob Bearman wrote:
In other words, noclobber is the same as bFailIfExists. When
noclobber==FALSE, you want the copy to overwrite. Instead, the current
code fails the copy.
Good spot! I take it LyX chewed up something it shouldn't have done?
--
Angus
Rob Bearman wrote:
In other words, noclobber is the same as bFailIfExists. When
noclobber==FALSE, you want the copy to overwrite. Instead, the current
code fails the copy.
Good spot! I take it LyX chewed up something it shouldn't have done?
I found it while playing with Save As The
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:19:06PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 04:01:26PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
As soon as you have acknowledged the recursive nature of the current
update(), then something like this was bound to be needed. Well done for
getting to grips with
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 12:40:08PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
the menu entry NavigateRefs in LyX 1.3 is misleading, because the
user expects to navigate to the next reference in the document. Instead,
Refs lets the user jump from a reference to its corresponding label.
(Actually, I
John Levon wrote:
This is called 'Goto Reference'[1] in 1.4, we need to harmonise any
changes.
Don't worry. I will send a corresponding LyX 1.4 patch in a few seconds.
I've no idea why we have this but not the inverse operation in
the menu. If we have one, we should have the other.
We have the
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 05:58:52PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
This is called 'Goto Reference'[1] in 1.4, we need to harmonise any
changes.
Don't worry. I will send a corresponding LyX 1.4 patch in a few seconds.
We still want the 'Goto'.
I've no idea why we have this but not the
Hello,
here are a few more text changes for LyX 1.4 (partly ported from the 1.3
branch). Once again, the objective is GUI consistency.
Due to the fact that Goto Reference is called Goto Label now (see
previous emails), I also changed the name of the corresponding LFUN. I
hope this is OK.
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 06:08:11PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
here are a few more text changes for LyX 1.4 (partly ported from the 1.3
branch). Once again, the objective is GUI consistency.
Looks fine
john
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 12:39:19PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:23:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Urs. Doesn't cmd[-1] mean cmd[cmd.length()-2]. Some nasty c-ism?
Only for cmd.lenght() == -1.
I think you should redo your math
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:49:53PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:19:06PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 04:01:26PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
As soon as you have acknowledged the recursive nature of the current
update(), then something like
Could anybody please make sure that 'his' code does not contain
unnecessary update() calls?
As a first approximation I'd classify any update() with exception
of the one in lyxfunc.C as 'unnecessary'.
Most notably the LFUN_INSET_MODIFY handling seems to have sneaked
something in...
Andre'
Andre Poenitz wrote:
[Actually, there seems to be some bad Qt GUI interaction involved as the
problem shows only up when having certain dialogs open. Otherwise, plain
full redraw seems to be fast enough...]
You reckon it's fast enough? 14x is *much* slower than 13x when using over
an ADSL
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 08:42:39PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:49:53PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:19:06PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
I understand (now) that update() might be called recursively (again).
However, this does not serve
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 11:57:47AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
I expect this would work fine if we could, in coordcache, turn bool
updating into int updating, counting the number of screen redraws we
have pending.
Best thing I can think of right now is some 'dispatch queue'
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:58:34PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Well, the files are in the way... :-)
>
> Either you have removed the CVS subdirectory or you work on a Windows
> machine and you have changed the file names from lower to upper case or
> vice versa...
No Windows, and I haven't
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:43:45PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:28:47PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 03:59:47PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > But there is no graphics or the like within a mile.
> > > It is _typing characters_ that does
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:43:45PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:28:47PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 03:59:47PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > But there is no graphics or the like within a mile.
> > > It is _typing characters_ that does
And the patch...
Index: BufferView_pimpl.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/BufferView_pimpl.C,v
retrieving revision 1.581
diff -u -p -r1.581 BufferView_pimpl.C
--- BufferView_pimpl.C 20 Apr 2005 17:35:46 -
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:23:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Urs. Doesn't cmd[-1] mean cmd[cmd.length()-2]. Some nasty c-ism?
>
> Only for cmd.lenght() == -1.
I think you should redo your math ;-P
Alfredo
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> PS: If Alfredo doesn't shout within a few hours that he'll give it a try
> I'd try to convince the family that this is important...
Haha
Good luck with that ;-)
Alfredo
Hello
the menu entry "Navigate>Refs" in LyX 1.3 is misleading, because the
user expects to navigate to the next reference in the document. Instead,
"Refs" lets the user jump from a reference to its corresponding label.
(Actually, I thought the function is broken until I found out its real
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:43:45PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:28:47PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 03:59:47PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > But there is no graphics or the like within a mile.
> > > It is _typing characters_ that does
Rob Bearman wrote:
> In other words, "noclobber" is the same as "bFailIfExists." When
> noclobber==FALSE, you want the copy to overwrite. Instead, the current
> code fails the copy.
Good spot! I take it LyX chewed up something it shouldn't have done?
--
Angus
> Rob Bearman wrote:
>
>> In other words, "noclobber" is the same as "bFailIfExists." When
>> noclobber==FALSE, you want the copy to overwrite. Instead, the current
>> code fails the copy.
>
> Good spot! I take it LyX chewed up something it shouldn't have done?
I found it while playing with
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:19:06PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 04:01:26PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > As soon as you have acknowledged the recursive nature of the current
> > update(), then something like this was bound to be needed. Well done for
> > getting to
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 12:40:08PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> the menu entry "Navigate>Refs" in LyX 1.3 is misleading, because the
> user expects to navigate to the next reference in the document. Instead,
> "Refs" lets the user jump from a reference to its corresponding label.
>
John Levon wrote:
This is called 'Goto Reference'[1] in 1.4, we need to harmonise any
changes.
Don't worry. I will send a corresponding LyX 1.4 patch in a few seconds.
I've no idea why we have this but not the inverse operation in
the menu. If we have one, we should have the other.
We have the
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 05:58:52PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> >This is called 'Goto Reference'[1] in 1.4, we need to harmonise any
> >changes.
> >
> Don't worry. I will send a corresponding LyX 1.4 patch in a few seconds.
We still want the 'Goto'.
> >I've no idea why we have this but not
Hello,
here are a few more text changes for LyX 1.4 (partly ported from the 1.3
branch). Once again, the objective is GUI consistency.
Due to the fact that "Goto Reference" is called "Goto Label" now (see
previous emails), I also changed the name of the corresponding LFUN. I
hope this is OK.
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 06:08:11PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> here are a few more text changes for LyX 1.4 (partly ported from the 1.3
> branch). Once again, the objective is GUI consistency.
Looks fine
john
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 12:39:19PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:23:56PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> Urs. Doesn't cmd[-1] mean cmd[cmd.length()-2]. Some nasty c-ism?
> >
> > Only for cmd.lenght() == -1.
>
> I think you should
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:49:53PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:19:06PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 04:01:26PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > As soon as you have acknowledged the recursive nature of the current
> > > update(), then
Could anybody please make sure that 'his' code does not contain
unnecessary update() calls?
As a first approximation I'd classify any update() with exception
of the one in lyxfunc.C as 'unnecessary'.
Most notably the LFUN_INSET_MODIFY handling seems to have sneaked
something in...
Andre'
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> [Actually, there seems to be some bad Qt GUI interaction involved as the
> problem shows only up when having certain dialogs open. Otherwise, plain
> full redraw seems to be fast enough...]
You reckon it's fast enough? 14x is *much* slower than 13x when using over
an ADSL
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 08:42:39PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:49:53PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:19:06PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > I understand (now) that update() might be called recursively (again).
> > > However, this does
44 matches
Mail list logo
