Re: LyX 1.4 on Windows (MinGW)

2005-10-25 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Michael" == Michael Gerz >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Michael> Comments? It should (hopefully) not affect behaviour on other > Michael> platforms. BTW: According to the man pages, gettext ALWAYS > Michael> returns a reasonable string. There is no real

Re: Solaris x86 issues

2005-10-25 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 04:57:45PM -0700, Markus Mayer wrote: > I this case I would do something like > > /** > * Solaris x86 hack > * (Solaris x86 defines SP and PC in /usr/include/ia32/sys/reg.h) > */ The comment is fine, but: > #if (defined(__i386) && defined(sun) && defined(__SVR4)) I t

Re: Solaris x86 issues

2005-10-25 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 03:45:28PM -0700, Markus Mayer wrote: | | > It took a while to figure out what the reason was and I just discovered | > that it is even a known issue and that a bug-fix has been proposed two | > and a half years ago (http://bugzilla

Re: Solaris x86 issues

2005-10-25 Thread Markus Mayer
On Wednesday, 26 Oct 2005 00:22 +0100, John Levon wrote: > Rather, we should do the > > #ifdef SP > #undef SP > #endif > > approach mentioned in the bug. That way, when nobody uses Solaris 9 or > earlier any more (it won't happen on S10), it's easy to remove the hack. That is true. It won't aff

Re: Solaris x86 issues

2005-10-25 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 03:45:28PM -0700, Markus Mayer wrote: > It took a while to figure out what the reason was and I just discovered > that it is even a known issue and that a bug-fix has been proposed two > and a half years ago (http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=992). I don't think your

Solaris x86 issues

2005-10-25 Thread Markus Mayer
Hi, I took over maintaining LyX for the Blastwave project (http://www.blastwave.org/) which provides packaged open source software for the Solaris platform (inspired by Debian). While there were no problems compiling LyX for the SPARC architecture, on x86 I ran into a compiler error: [...] /opt/

Win32 packaging patch

2005-10-25 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc, the attached patch is against the LyX 1.3.x tree but I propose to apply it to the 1.4.x tree too. It corrects a few comments in the README and build_lyxwin.sh. It also makes lyx_configure.C rather more robust (used to generate lyx_configure.dll that in turn is used by the Windows instal

[patch] update layout file documentation

2005-10-25 Thread Georg Baum
This patch adapts the layout file documentation to the current file format and documents manual conversion. I left out a lot of whitespace that was added by current LyX in order to make the patch readable. The only place where I am not sure if it is correct is the character style documentation.

http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX137pre

2005-10-25 Thread Angus Leeming
Christian Ehrlicher has told me that he's resolved many of the outstanding issues with the "Cue Tea"/Win code that were introduced by the backporting of some official Qt4 code into their code base. I thought, therefore, that I'd upload a snapshot of the current LyX 1.3.x CVS tree to http://wik

Re: LyX 1.4 on Windows (MinGW)

2005-10-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michael> you tried to fix a language recognition problem but that is Michael> not the issue. Our problem is that gettext (MinGW, Michael> --with-included-gettext) doesn't really care about what we do Michael> in messages.C. It seems to ch

[PATCH] Re: keymap-toggle LFUN

2005-10-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: In LyXAction.C we have both of Angus> these. Only one can be correct... { LFUN_KMAP_TOGGLE, Angus> "keymap-toggle", ReadOnly }, and { LFUN_KEYMAP_TOGGLE, Angus> "keymap-toggle", Noop }, >> You are the on

Re: Wrong characters in math (CVS)

2005-10-25 Thread John C. Spray
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 10:55 -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > Have you got appropriate screen fonts installed > (http://wiki.lyx.org/FAQ/Qt)? That's sorted it, thanks. John

Re: [PATCH] bug 2092: branches not propagated to child documents

2005-10-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> What do you think. Should I apply this? Martin> Yes, I think so. Done. JMarc

Re: LyX 1.4 on Windows (MinGW)

2005-10-25 Thread Michael Gerz
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: What about something like ... Looking at the sources of intl/localename.c, it ought to work. Michael, could you try this out? _nl_locale_name calls GetThreadLocale and translates the win32 locales to POSIX-like ones. Jean-Marc, you tried to fix a language reco

Re: [PATCH] bug 2092: branches not propagated to child documents

2005-10-25 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 06:08:48PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 02:20:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > The attached additional patch places the master doc's branches at least > on the menu tree within the child. > > - Martin Ignore this :-) - Martin pgpuL1

Re: [PATCH] bug 2092: branches not propagated to child documents

2005-10-25 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 05:06:40PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Martin> Yes, this seems to work... at least when outputting to LaTeX. > > Martin> The funny thing is, you have to independently define the > Martin> branches in

Re: [PATCH] bug 2092: branches not propagated to child documents

2005-10-25 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 02:20:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Another bug that is not too difficult to fix. The only remaining > problem I see is that the brach list that is seen in the child > document settings is not the right one. This is a general problem with > child documents and

Re: [PATCH] bug 2092: branches not propagated to child documents

2005-10-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> Yes, this seems to work... at least when outputting to LaTeX. Martin> The funny thing is, you have to independently define the Martin> branches in the child document (as you say), and then create Martin> branch insets there. But

Re: Wrong characters in math (CVS)

2005-10-25 Thread Paul A. Rubin
John C. Spray wrote: Hello, Just built LyX from CVS on FC4, and am getting erroneous characters in math: I write "\approx" and I get a kind of bottom-half-of-an-ellipse instead of a wiggly equals sign. The character comes out correctly in the postscript output though. John Have you got appro

Re: [PATCH] bug 2092: branches not propagated to child documents

2005-10-25 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 02:20:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Another bug that is not too difficult to fix. The only remaining > problem I see is that the brach list that is seen in the child > document settings is not the right one. This is a general problem with > child documents and

Re: Paragraph environment missing from document class: article(AMS)

2005-10-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Thomas" == Scheffler, Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Thomas> Dear developers, the document class article(AMS) does not Thomas> include a Paragraph environment. It includes a Paragraph* and Thomas> Subparagraph* environment though. Thomas> If I convert a document formated unter document

Wrong characters in math (CVS)

2005-10-25 Thread John C. Spray
Hello, Just built LyX from CVS on FC4, and am getting erroneous characters in math: I write "\approx" and I get a kind of bottom-half-of-an-ellipse instead of a wiggly equals sign. The character comes out correctly in the postscript output though. John

Re: [patch] fix layout2layout

2005-10-25 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 24 October 2005 15:13, Georg Baum wrote: > line[-1:] If you know that _line_ is not empty then line[-1] is enough. As you already know line[-1:-1] is always empty, that was why the test failled. The advantage of using slices over array indices is that slices will work always wh

[PATCH] Re: Problem with Navigation menu when using Hollywood document class

2005-10-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Daniel" == Daniel Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Daniel> Summary: Problem with Navigation menu when using Hollywood Daniel> document class Description: Every single line within a Daniel> Hollywood-class document is listed within the Navigation menu, Daniel> meaning it fills the screen

[PATCH] bug 2092: branches not propagated to child documents

2005-10-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Another bug that is not too difficult to fix. The only remaining problem I see is that the brach list that is seen in the child document settings is not the right one. This is a general problem with child documents and buffer settings, anyway. Martin, could you take a quick look please? JMarc I

Re: Bug 2101: Any character followed by Right Arrow moves the cursorto the next cell

2005-10-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> I agree with this, having tried it earlier and not seeing Martin> anything untoward. I applied it. JMarc

Re: Bug 2101: Any character followed by Right Arrow moves the cursorto the next cell

2005-10-25 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 12:01 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Andre> This was not exactly flawless in 1.3 and nontrivial to track so > Andre> I originally completely removed this in 1.4. In Paris, Juergen > Andre> decided that the f

Re: Bug 2101: Any character followed by Right Arrow moves the cursorto the next cell

2005-10-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> This was not exactly flawless in 1.3 and nontrivial to track so Andre> I originally completely removed this in 1.4. In Paris, Juergen Andre> decided that the feature is necessary and re-implemented it Andre> from scratch. I propose

Re: Can't compile on OSX

2005-10-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andreas" == Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andreas> Hi! I tried to compile LyX again after some time, but got an Andreas> error (Qt 3.3.5, OSX 10.3.8). Looks as if Carbon.h clashes Andreas> with qwindowdefs.h (yuck). Any ideas anyone how to circumvent Andreas> this problem? The pr

Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] some dEPM work

2005-10-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> You know, the amazing thing is, I just suspected something Martin> like this, but couldn't make it hard. That's team work at its best :) Thanks for testing. I'll apply it. JMarc