Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
BTW, I stumbled over the RCs custom_export_format and
custom_view_format, which seem both unused nowadays. Can I remove them?
AFAICS these are leftovers from the pre-converters era. Although GuiSendto
still considers custom_export_command, I doubt anyone is actually
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 17:24, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote:
I tested out Trac today and see that
- every character that is not plain ASCII is displayed as some garbage
character, it seems that Trac needs to be explicitly configured to output
Unicode
Fixed.
- How can normal users
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes schrieb:
I don't understand, what do you propose?
This... not tested nor compiled...
I understand now. But I think its a matter of taste.
Well, it's matter of good taste ;-)
Good taste in programming is something that you develop continuously,
not
Dear Developers,
I would like to know the current state regarding the bug tracker
migration.
Is Trac open for new bug reports and updates?
Is Trac open for ordinary users?
Are there still plans to try a bugzilla revival?
What is the recommended way to report problems/wishes
* Trac
* user
On the page
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Administration#todo
there are some issues related to Trac listed, I've copied them below
for your convenience. Could someone let me know which of those that are
now fixed, or simply edit the wiki page directly. I think the second
issue from the
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Guenter Milde wrote:
Are there still plans to try a bugzilla revival?
I think there is still a shortage of someone with the skill to install and
maintain a bugzilla installation, so I think this is still not likely to
happen.
I can't answer any of your other questions,
* Web/wiki/trac pages have 30s idle times
Not really trac releated I guess... I have tried to figure out what causes
the delay, but no luck yet.
* Trac do not notify peple via email
Fixed.
* redirection http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5836 -
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/5836
sp...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: spitz
Date: Tue Apr 7 07:01:08 2009
New Revision: 29134
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29134
Log:
* First step towards default view format.
The icons could be replaced by something nicer.
+ case LFUN_BUFFER_UPDATE:
+ case
Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
* Trac homepage into the top line of buttons
I don't get it. What does this mean?
(And I am pretty sure that we don't want a link to edgewall there.)
i was not clear. what i mean that 'our' homepage of trac
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome
should be
Pavel Sanda wrote:
please check that doxygen entries are correct wrt these changes.
I'll do. Thanks for the reminder.
Jürgen
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
* Web/wiki/trac pages have 30s idle times
Not really trac releated I guess... I have tried to figure out what
causes the delay, but no luck yet.
I don't think it's specific to Trac either, and I'm not completely
convinced it's because of
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
On Sunday 05 April 2009 16:09:05 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Haha, now we know what this was about!
FYI we just hide the document selection combo since 1.6.0 because nobody
knew why this was needed. Maybe we can restore it back in 1.6.3 as we
found a user :-)
Abdel.
Please
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Revert r25174
on users request
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org/msg72822.html .
branch?
OK. Although I feel we should rather try to implement real xr support.
Jürgen
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
If you could enable again the use of the document selection combo, I'd
be very grateful.
I'll see what I can do but it won't be soon. But I copy the devel list in
case someone could do it before.
no he
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: sanda
Date: Tue Apr 7 13:21:54 2009
New Revision: 29140
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29140
Log:
Revert r25174
on users request
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org/msg72822.html .
branch?
Uwe,
...to cross-reference equations
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
On Sunday 05 April 2009 16:09:05 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Haha, now we know what this was about!
FYI we just hide the document selection combo since 1.6.0 because nobody
knew why this was needed. Maybe we can restore it back in 1.6.3 as we
found a
Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
- We allow now that people can report bugs anonymously. Can this be
turned off? Anonymous reports don't help us in most cases because
one often needs to ask back to the reported to be able to reproduce
the problem or contact the reporter when he
OTOH mail notifications should now work.
Not fully, I now get _always_ an emails, even when I
haven't reported the bug, are not the owner, or on the CC list.
Why don't I get the e-mails then ?
Thanks and regards
Uwe
Vincent
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
This is the first step only. My further plans are:
* making the default format customizable on a per-document basis
Here's the patch. It introduces a new Output pane in the document settings.
Currently, Use xetex and the default format are there. I plan to add some
* Trac homepage into the top line of buttons
I don't get it. What does this mean?
(And I am pretty sure that we don't want a link to edgewall there.)
I don't get it either... It was added to the original page by Pavel.
Pavel?
I suspect that he proposes to add a link to
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 15:00, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
- We allow now that people can report bugs anonymously. Can this be
turned off? Anonymous reports don't help us in most cases because
one often needs to ask back to the reported to be able
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW schrieb:
OTOH mail notifications should now work.
Not fully, I now get _always_ an emails, even when I
haven't reported the bug, are not the owner, or on the CC list.
Why don't I get the e-mails then ?
I get these emails today:
#4997: please add conversion
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:38, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
* Trac homepage into the top line of buttons
I don't get it. What does this mean?
(And I am pretty sure that we don't want a link to edgewall there.)
i was not clear. what i mean that 'our'
I'm now spammed by these emails which make no sense as these bugs are already
closed:
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: [The LyX Project] #4226: Conversion to PDF from SVG for pdftex.
Datum: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:54:19 -
Von: LyX Ticket Tracker t...@puben.org
Antwort an:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
The two next are really just tickets with either milestone 1.6.3 or 2.0.0
set.
They have the respective keywords set (fisedintrunk/fixedinbranch). So they
show the really open issues.
Jürgen
Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
I am not as sure as you that hit is without merit.
What do you mean with this sentence?
I am not as sure as you that this is without merit.
;-) nice try, but to be serious, I know English but don't understand the
meaning of this sentence.
OTOH
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 16:58, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW schrieb:
OTOH mail notifications should now work.
Not fully, I now get _always_ an emails, even when I
haven't reported the bug, are not the owner, or on the CC list.
Why don't I get the e-mails
I'm now spammed by these emails which make no sense as
these bugs are already closed:
That's because I'm cleaning up a bit. If you mark a bug as
duplicated/invalid etc., the milestone should be cleared.
It seems that Trac now sends an e-mail to everyone that has made a
comment in a bug,
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 17:08, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
I am not as sure as you that hit is without merit.
What do you mean with this sentence?
I am not as sure as you that this is without merit.
;-) nice try, but to be serious, I know
Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:38, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
* Trac homepage into the top line of buttons
I don't get it. What does this mean?
(And I am pretty sure that we don't want a link to edgewall there.)
i
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
That's because I'm cleaning up a bit. If you mark a bug as
duplicated/invalid etc., the milestone should be cleared.
It seems that Trac now sends an e-mail to everyone that has made a
comment in a bug, which could make sense actually.
when i'm not CC-ed
That's because I'm cleaning up a bit. If you mark a bug as
duplicated/invalid etc., the milestone should be cleared.
It seems that Trac now sends an e-mail to everyone that has made a
comment in a bug, which could make sense actually.
when i'm not CC-ed why should i get spammed?
pavel
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
That's because I'm cleaning up a bit. If you mark a bug as
duplicated/invalid etc., the milestone should be cleared.
It seems that Trac now sends an e-mail to everyone that has made a
comment in a bug, which could make sense actually.
when i'm
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
This is the first step only. My further plans are:
* making the default format customizable on a per-document basis
Here's the patch. It introduces a new Output pane in the document settings.
Currently, Use xetex and the default
rgheck wrote:
My only question about this is how open-ended the formats will be. If
there's only a certain number that are possible, then
BufferParams::outputFormat could be an int, or better an enum, and we
can keep track of the ones we have available in a central location.
But we currently
.. finished now.
I couldn't stand it any longer, and once I started I couldn't stop.
Vincent
Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
You are saying that having anonymous user are without benefit, I am
saying that I don't agree.
Having a bug report is of course better than don't having it, but be able to ask back is much more
useful for us to be able to reproduce and fix problem.
So why do I
So why do I get an email?
I am guessing since you have added a comment on the ticket.
But when I don't add myself to CC, I don't want to be notified by email.
It seems to be solved, right ?
Vincent
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:07:52AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Uwe Stöhr schrieb:
You are doing it the wrong way, IMHO. You should introduce \cfracleft
and \cfracright in place of \cfracthree and give visual feedback for
the position of the numerator.
I think that your solution is
Le 07/04/2009 17:33, rgheck a écrit :
My only question about this is how open-ended the formats will be. If
there's only a certain number that are possible, then
BufferParams::outputFormat could be an int, or better an enum, and we
can keep track of the ones we have available in a central
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 07/04/2009 17:33, rgheck a écrit :
My only question about this is how open-ended the formats will be. If
there's only a certain number that are possible, then
BufferParams::outputFormat could be an int, or better an enum, and we
can keep track of the ones we
rgheck wrote:
The question was just where the formats are being defined,
PrefsOutputFile formats
and whether they're supposed to be extensible by the user.
Yes.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
rgheck wrote:
The question was just where the formats are being defined,
PrefsOutputFile formats
and whether they're supposed to be extensible by the user.
Yes.
Sorry, maybe I was mixing this up with the xetex stuff.
rh
Concerning the new buffer-view icons, what is the default format for viewing documents and how can
it be changed?
When I want to view my file as DVI, I now always have to press two buttons instead of one, which
might be annoying for the users. I think that the toolbar has enough space to keep
I created a document with current trunk saved it in the format (without any specification to use
XeTeX) and opened it with current 1.6.x branch. But LyX 1.6.x cannot compile the file any longer,
because this code was added to the document:
%% This document must be processed with xelatex!
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> BTW, I stumbled over the RCs "custom_export_format" and
> "custom_view_format", which seem both unused nowadays. Can I remove them?
AFAICS these are leftovers from the pre-converters era. Although GuiSendto
still considers custom_export_command, I doubt anyone is
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 17:24, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I tested out Trac today and see that
>
> - every character that is not plain ASCII is displayed as some "garbage
> character", it seems that Trac needs to be explicitly configured to output
> Unicode
Fixed.
> - How can normal
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes schrieb:
I don't understand, what do you propose?
This... not tested nor compiled...
I understand now. But I think its a matter of taste.
Well, it's matter of good taste ;-)
Good taste in programming is something that you develop continuously,
not
Dear Developers,
I would like to know the current state regarding the bug tracker
migration.
Is Trac open for new bug reports and updates?
Is Trac open for ordinary users?
Are there still plans to try a bugzilla revival?
What is the recommended way to report problems/wishes
* Trac
* user
On the page
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Administration#todo
there are some issues related to Trac listed, I've copied them below
for your convenience. Could someone let me know which of those that are
now fixed, or simply edit the wiki page directly. I think the second
issue from the
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Guenter Milde wrote:
Are there still plans to try a bugzilla revival?
I think there is still a shortage of someone with the skill to install and
maintain a bugzilla installation, so I think this is still not likely to
happen.
I can't answer any of your other questions,
> * Web/wiki/trac pages have 30s idle times
Not really trac releated I guess... I have tried to figure out what causes
the delay, but no luck yet.
> * Trac do not notify peple via email
Fixed.
> * redirection http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5836 ->
>
sp...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: spitz
> Date: Tue Apr 7 07:01:08 2009
> New Revision: 29134
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29134
>
> Log:
> * First step towards default view format.
> The icons could be replaced by something nicer.
>
> + case LFUN_BUFFER_UPDATE:
> + case
Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
> > * Trac homepage into the top line of buttons
>
>
> I don't get it. What does this mean?
> (And I am pretty sure that we don't want a link to edgewall there.)
i was not clear. what i mean that 'our' homepage of trac
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> please check that doxygen entries are correct wrt these changes.
I'll do. Thanks for the reminder.
Jürgen
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
* Web/wiki/trac pages have 30s idle times
Not really trac releated I guess... I have tried to figure out what
causes the delay, but no luck yet.
I don't think it's specific to Trac either, and I'm not completely
convinced it's because of
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
On Sunday 05 April 2009 16:09:05 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Haha, now we know what this was about!
FYI we just hide the document selection combo since 1.6.0 because nobody
knew why this was needed. Maybe we can restore it back in 1.6.3 as we
found a user :-)
Abdel.
Please
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Revert r25174
> > on users request
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org/msg72822.html .
>
> branch?
OK. Although I feel we should rather try to implement real xr support.
Jürgen
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
If you could enable again the use of the "document selection combo", I'd
be very grateful.
I'll see what I can do but it won't be soon. But I copy the devel list in
case someone could do it before.
no he
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: sanda
> Date: Tue Apr 7 13:21:54 2009
> New Revision: 29140
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/29140
>
> Log:
> Revert r25174
> on users request
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org/msg72822.html .
branch?
Uwe,
"...to cross-reference
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
>> On Sunday 05 April 2009 16:09:05 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> Haha, now we know what this was about!
>>> FYI we just hide the document selection combo since 1.6.0 because nobody
>>> knew why this was needed. Maybe we can restore it back in 1.6.3 as
Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
- We allow now that people can report bugs anonymously. Can this be
turned off? Anonymous reports don't help us in most cases because
one often needs to ask back to the reported to be able to reproduce
the problem or contact the reporter when he
>> OTOH mail notifications should now work.
>
>Not fully, I now get _always_ an emails, even when I
>haven't reported the bug, are not the owner, or on the CC list.
Why don't I get the e-mails then ?
>Thanks and regards
>Uwe
Vincent
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> This is the first step only. My further plans are:
>
> * making the default format customizable on a per-document basis
Here's the patch. It introduces a new "Output" pane in the document settings.
Currently, "Use xetex" and the default format are there. I plan to add
>> * Trac homepage into the top line of buttons
>>
>>
>> I don't get it. What does this mean?
>> (And I am pretty sure that we don't want a link to edgewall there.)
>
>
>I don't get it either... It was added to the original page by Pavel.
>
> Pavel?
I suspect that he proposes to add a link to
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 15:00, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
>
> - We allow now that people can report bugs anonymously. Can this be
>>turned off? Anonymous reports don't help us in most cases because
>>one often needs to ask back to the reported to
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW schrieb:
OTOH mail notifications should now work.
Not fully, I now get _always_ an emails, even when I
haven't reported the bug, are not the owner, or on the CC list.
Why don't I get the e-mails then ?
I get these emails today:
> #4997: please add conversion
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:38, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
> > > * Trac homepage into the top line of buttons
> >
> >
> > I don't get it. What does this mean?
> > (And I am pretty sure that we don't want a link to edgewall there.)
>
> i was not clear. what i
I'm now spammed by these emails which make no sense as these bugs are already
closed:
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: [The LyX Project] #4226: Conversion to PDF from SVG for pdftex.
Datum: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:54:19 -
Von: LyX Ticket Tracker
Antwort an:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> The two next are really just tickets with either milestone 1.6.3 or 2.0.0
> set.
They have the respective keywords set (fisedintrunk/fixedinbranch). So they
show the "really" open issues.
Jürgen
Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
I am not as sure as you that hit is without merit.
What do you mean with this sentence?
"I am not as sure as you that this is without merit."
;-) nice try, but to be serious, I know English but don't understand the
meaning of this sentence.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 16:58, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW schrieb:
>
> OTOH mail notifications should now work.
>>> Not fully, I now get _always_ an emails, even when I
>>> haven't reported the bug, are not the owner, or on the CC list.
>>>
>>
>> Why
> I'm now spammed by these emails which make no sense as
> these bugs are already closed:
That's because I'm cleaning up a bit. If you mark a bug as
duplicated/invalid etc., the milestone should be cleared.
It seems that Trac now sends an e-mail to everyone that has made a
comment in a bug,
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 17:08, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
>
> I am not as sure as you that hit is without merit.
>>
>>What do you mean with this sentence?
>>
>> "I am not as sure as you that this is without merit."
>>
>
> ;-) nice try, but to be
Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:38, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> > Lars Gullik Bj??nnes wrote:
> > > > * Trac homepage into the top line of buttons
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't get it. What does this mean?
> > > (And I am pretty sure that we don't want a link to
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> That's because I'm cleaning up a bit. If you mark a bug as
> duplicated/invalid etc., the milestone should be cleared.
>
> It seems that Trac now sends an e-mail to everyone that has made a
> comment in a bug, which could make sense actually.
when i'm not
>> That's because I'm cleaning up a bit. If you mark a bug as
>> duplicated/invalid etc., the milestone should be cleared.
>>
>> It seems that Trac now sends an e-mail to everyone that has made a
>> comment in a bug, which could make sense actually.
>
>when i'm not CC-ed why should i get
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>
> >> That's because I'm cleaning up a bit. If you mark a bug as
> >> duplicated/invalid etc., the milestone should be cleared.
> >>
> >> It seems that Trac now sends an e-mail to everyone that has made a
> >> comment in a bug, which could make sense
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
This is the first step only. My further plans are:
* making the default format customizable on a per-document basis
Here's the patch. It introduces a new "Output" pane in the document settings.
Currently, "Use xetex" and the
rgheck wrote:
> My only question about this is how open-ended the formats will be. If
> there's only a certain number that are possible, then
> BufferParams::outputFormat could be an int, or better an enum, and we
> can keep track of the ones we have available in a central location.
But we
.. finished now.
I couldn't stand it any longer, and once I started I couldn't stop.
Vincent
Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
You are saying that having anonymous user are without benefit, I am
saying that I don't agree.
Having a bug report is of course better than don't having it, but be able to ask back is much more
useful for us to be able to reproduce and fix problem.
>> So why do
> >> So why do I get an email?
> >
> > I am guessing since you have added a comment on the ticket.
>
>But when I don't add myself to CC, I don't want to be notified by email.
>
It seems to be solved, right ?
Vincent
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:07:52AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Uwe Stöhr schrieb:
>
> >> You are doing it the wrong way, IMHO. You should introduce \cfracleft
> >> and \cfracright in place of \cfracthree and give visual feedback for
> >> the position of the numerator.
> >
> > I think that your
Le 07/04/2009 17:33, rgheck a écrit :
My only question about this is how open-ended the formats will be. If
there's only a certain number that are possible, then
BufferParams::outputFormat could be an int, or better an enum, and we
can keep track of the ones we have available in a central
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 07/04/2009 17:33, rgheck a écrit :
My only question about this is how open-ended the formats will be. If
there's only a certain number that are possible, then
BufferParams::outputFormat could be an int, or better an enum, and we
can keep track of the ones we
rgheck wrote:
> The question was just where the formats are being defined,
Prefs>Output>File formats
> and whether they're supposed to be extensible by the user.
Yes.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
rgheck wrote:
The question was just where the formats are being defined,
Prefs>Output>File formats
and whether they're supposed to be extensible by the user.
Yes.
Sorry, maybe I was mixing this up with the xetex stuff.
rh
Concerning the new buffer-view icons, what is the default format for viewing documents and how can
it be changed?
When I want to view my file as DVI, I now always have to press two buttons instead of one, which
might be annoying for the users. I think that the toolbar has enough space to keep
I created a document with current trunk saved it in the format (without any specification to use
XeTeX) and opened it with current 1.6.x branch. But LyX 1.6.x cannot compile the file any longer,
because this code was added to the document:
%% This document must be processed with xelatex!
90 matches
Mail list logo