Re: about ulem support and Unicode

2009-05-05 Thread Pavel Sanda
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > you recently implemented support for some underlining styles. About a year > ago I also planned this too and Jürgen convinced me that we need a method > that works for Unicode too. > The solution I see is to use the soulutf package while you used the ulem > package. Have you t

Re: bugz-trac reminder

2009-05-05 Thread Pavel Sanda
Christian Ridderström wrote: > It wasn't easy, but I've finally got something... please give it a try. nice work! thank you :) pavel

Re: Some poll about elyxer

2009-05-05 Thread Pavel Sanda
Alex Fernandez wrote: > As to the first issue, what do you suggest? Maybe a custom copier > could copy images to /tmp? either reuse the the already existing copier(s) in our tree our writing the new one. (i guess that the copiers we already have should be enough. just look only ho other convetors

about ulem support and Unicode

2009-05-05 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Hello Pavel, you recently implemented support for some underlining styles. About a year ago I also planned this too and Jürgen convinced me that we need a method that works for Unicode too. The solution I see is to use the soulutf package while you used the ulem package. Have you tested that th

Re: Some poll about elyxer

2009-05-05 Thread Alex Fernandez
Hi Pavel, On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Sorry, I must have missed the question in the turmoil. Can you give me >> a pointer? > > tools -> preferences -> file formats -> html (elyxer) -> copier > > see copiers section in customization manual. this maybe the cause why image

Re: bugz-trac reminder

2009-05-05 Thread Christian Ridderström
Hi Pavel, It wasn't easy, but I've finally got something... please give it a try. /Christian 2009/5/3 Pavel Sanda : > Hello Christian, > > have you looked on the issue of remapping > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5480 > -> > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/5480 > ? > > its pain to rewri

Re: Feature offering

2009-05-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
should be this reported to the ulem (or cite) package maintainers? also do we encounter this in our normal documents with citations? if it cause too much problem, we can revert it back... It happens that the author of both packages is Donald Arseneau (aka one of the masters of the style files).

Re: [PATCH] Re: [RFC] Per-document output settings

2009-05-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Isn't that what I was suggesting a few days ago? Well, not quite, since I was suggesting we just put them all on the menu so that they're all there to be chosen from, on an ad hoc basis, rather than making the user go into the preferences or settings or something to change them. JMarc, what

Re: Feature offering

2009-05-05 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:50:04PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > I think that ulem is better for underlining but switching to it > > needs some clever thought... maybe reverting is the easiest thing > > to do... > > no preference here. i will revert it for the time being

Re: non-blocking processing

2009-05-05 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:51:15PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 08:22:45PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote: > >> Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > >> > > >>> I've been using QProcess extensively recently and it works perfectly > >>> across platforms. I won't wor

Re: non-blocking processing

2009-05-05 Thread Peter Kümmel
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 08:22:45PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote: >> Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >> > >>> I've been using QProcess extensively recently and it works perfectly >>> across platforms. I won't worry about that. The different signals it >>> emits are very useful. I can c

Re: Feature offering

2009-05-05 Thread Pavel Sanda
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > I think that ulem is better for underlining but switching to it > needs some clever thought... maybe reverting is the easiest thing > to do... no preference here. i will revert it for the time being; whosoever want to make it work even with citations, feel free to take t

Re: Feature offering

2009-05-05 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 12:54:02PM -0400, rgheck wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > > If someone incurs in this problem, this is the updated workaround: > > > > \usepackage{cite} > > \let\olduline\uline > > \newsavebox{\cbox} > > \let\oldcite\cite > > \newcommand{\newcite}[1]{\sbox\cbox{\oldci

Re: Feature offering

2009-05-05 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 05:39:01PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > You just broke a number of old documents of mine, but I guess that is > > unavoidable. The problem is that ulem is incompatible with the cite > > package and misterious errors occur when you underline a cita

Re: Feature offering

2009-05-05 Thread rgheck
Pavel Sanda wrote: Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Yes. In a strict sense, you would have to revert the stuff to ERT. But also if you do not do that, an empty file format change would be advisable. i would bet that when we changed from soul to ulem this didnt happen and the same holds for th

Re: [PATCH] Re: [RFC] Per-document output settings

2009-05-05 Thread rgheck
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Here comes the first step. This implements the possibility to record all available programs of a sort in alternative RCs. I would love to have that for converters, so that configure.py configures all available converters/viewers,

Re: Feature offering

2009-05-05 Thread rgheck
Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 01:52:22PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: Pavel Sanda wrote: Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: However, now that we have ulem in, we should use it for underlining (if it is available), such that underlined text is broken across lines.

Re: Feature offering

2009-05-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Pavel Sanda wrote: > i would bet that when we changed from soul to ulem this didnt happen and > the same holds for the switch for some boxes or subfloats we have changed > last year even in branch (cant remember what it was exactly...) in fact i > seem to be unable to recall when such bumps happen

Re: Feature offering

2009-05-05 Thread Pavel Sanda
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Yes. In a strict sense, you would have to revert the stuff to ERT. But also > if you do not do that, an empty file format change would be advisable. i would bet that when we changed from soul to ulem this didnt happen and the same holds for the switch for some boxes or

Re: Feature offering

2009-05-05 Thread Pavel Sanda
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > You just broke a number of old documents of mine, but I guess that is > unavoidable. The problem is that ulem is incompatible with the cite > package and misterious errors occur when you underline a citation. should be this reported to the ulem (or cite) package maintain

Re: Feature offering

2009-05-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Pavel Sanda wrote: >> But you need to bumo the file format. > > eh? we increase fileformat any time we change > latex output? Yes. In a strict sense, you would have to revert the stuff to ERT. But also if you do not do that, an empty file format change would be advisable. Jürgen

Re: [PATCH] Re: [RFC] Per-document output settings

2009-05-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Here comes the first step. This implements the possibility to record all >> available programs of a sort in alternative RCs. > > I would love to have that for converters, so that configure.py > configures all available converters/viewers, not only the first one that

Re: [PATCH] Re: [RFC] Per-document output settings

2009-05-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes: > Here comes the first step. This implements the possibility to record all > available programs of a sort in alternative RCs. I would love to have that for converters, so that configure.py configures all available converters/viewers, not only the first one that fits.

Re: Feature offering

2009-05-05 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 01:52:22PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > > However, now that we have ulem in, we should use it for underlining (if > > > it is available), such that underlined text is broken across lines. > > > > i will look whether ulem

Re: Feature offering

2009-05-05 Thread Pavel Sanda
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > But you need to bumo the file format. eh? we increase fileformat any time we change latex output? pavel

[PATCH] Re: [RFC] Per-document output settings

2009-05-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Pavel Sanda wrote: > if you implement only additional parameters for programs detected by > configure and then run some kind of execvp call rather than the normal > system call, no additional program can be run that way. Thanks. Here comes the first step. This implements the possibility to recor

Re: Feature offering

2009-05-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Pavel Sanda wrote: > checkout the current trunk if thats what you wanted. I guess it is. Thanks. But you need to bumo the file format. Jürgen

Re: Feature offering

2009-05-05 Thread Pavel Sanda
Pavel Sanda wrote: > Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > However, now that we have ulem in, we should use it for underlining (if > > it is available), such that underlined text is broken across lines. > > i will look whether ulem supports across lines feature. checkout the current trunk if thats what

Re: Integration of libmythes and hunspell

2009-05-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> It would be easier to have a nod from the author to include it as is. > > This would mean that the author would need to re-release MyThes under the > GPL, right? Maybe. I think that Abdel asked him for it, so we'll see. JMarc

Re: Integration of libmythes and hunspell

2009-05-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > It would be easier to have a nod from the author to include it as is. This would mean that the author would need to re-release MyThes under the GPL, right? Jürgen

Re: Feature offering

2009-05-05 Thread Pavel Sanda
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: %\uuline{urgent} double-underlined text %\uwave{boat}wavy underline %\xout{removed} marked over with //. it would be piece of cake to add any of these (until i remember the code around). the question is - do we

Re: Integration of libmythes and hunspell

2009-05-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes: > Anyway, the Sleepykat license requires us to > > * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright > *notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the > *documentation and/or other materials provided with the distrib

Re: Integration of libmythes and hunspell

2009-05-05 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Pavel Sanda wrote: > this is the same as with artistic license which we already include. Still, I would be more confidet if we had some expert meaning. Anyway, the Sleepykat license requires us to * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright *notice, this list o